The Maestro has written another book

More summary! Spoiler alert!!!

He describes his first lesson and how much he loved horses as a child under 10. It was 2 pages of his happiness and not being picked on. Oh wait! The next summer his parents sent him to a horse camp where he was harassed by girls also under 10 about the fact he had a penis (what under 10 girls mock penises? WTH?) and was not Jewish. The camp was owned by a “sadistic” woman who also harassed him. I’m sensing a theme here. I find it hard to believe that either a) his camp stories are accurate and/or b) his parents didn’t come get him. This whole section is about how he was victimized by the “cruel” and “evil” owner whom I couldn’t imagine would be in business if this was true. But he got his revenge when a local trainer of kids took the kids to a show and he “beat the brains” out of the owner at her barn. The last paragraph starts with the saying “Revenge is a dish best served cold” and ends with him stating that he defeated her and she knew it. He was under 10 at the time.

Yep, no ghost writer here! Pure Maestro.

He then explains how his instructor turned him on to dressage. Of note, he gave the full name of the “evil” woman about but hasn’t listed the full name of his kid instructor. He was riding other horses and “winning” at every turn (I think of Charlie Sheen’s interpretation of “winning”). At 14, he decided to give a summer camp another try. The owner of this new camp “belonged in a mental institution”. Here we go. His parents didn’t seem to vet any place they sent him to. Again, I find it hard to believe this camp story is accurate and/or b) his parents didn’t care that he was being so abused and sworn at and put in physical danger while being the only one excluded from camp activities even though the parents paid money. First he complains about the horse he’s given to ride is difficult, now he’s saying the next horse he was given to ride that he really liked was “a trick” on the part of the owner. She even was so conniving that she offered to sell the horse to NP! Awful! Of note, NP doesn’t always get the name of this horse right (! - That is an example of the quality of editing). He didn’t get that horse because his instructor though it was too “push button” for him and later he’d be riding horses no one else would be able to ride.

Then he met Chevy in a parking lot! He told the woman who owned him that he was an experienced rider with a show background and the woman just let him get on for a 15 min ride in an adjacent field! He was a trainer now that he purchased him. He was a legend at the barn.

The next Chapter is about how an Olympian invited him to DaD as a teen. The female groom was incredibly nasty to his teenager self. A male security guard ripped the pass off of his neck and tackled him to the ground and told him that if he sees him again, “he’d kick his f*cking ass”. Oh, then he opened his jacket and revealed his gun, and told him that he’d kill him and his dad that night. And Christie was watching and did nothing! (I can’t think of an Olympic rider named Christie who would be at DaD, can you?) NP was traumatized for months and concluded that Christie and her groom have mental issues. That pattern again. Geeze, if this is true, why did his parents not put him in counseling? The world was apparently out to get him!

This must have been in the late 90s? I can’t BELIEVE that a security guard would tackle a kid with a pass petting a competition horse, pinning him on the ground so he couldn’t breathe and threatening to kill him and his father after showing him his gun.

This reads like a soap opera from the perspective of a super-paranoid person. The next chapter is called “A knife in my back” but I just can’t read anymore right now!

@Paint_Party, I’m counting on you to critique my critique whenever you get your version!! Please point out everywhere that I’ve been incorrect or not comprehending properly! We’re counting on you!!

36 Likes

Damn. You’re good!

3 Likes

Wait, so the reason given in the book is that the security guard attacked and threatened him for petting a horse?

4 Likes

Did he maybe mean Christine Traurig? He has a tendency to mess up or familiarize names in trying to feel like he is part of the “in crowd”.

1 Like

Did she ever ride a horse named Talent?

No, the reason was because the groom for Christie “rolled her eyes” and told him he couldn’t be in the stabling area. He said he had a pass from Christie (he apparently did). (It is my understanding that people can’t be in the stabling area at big FEI shows because of potential substance violations) She was saddling the horse for his freestyle. She was rude, obnoxious and running him out of the barn, according to him. He went to the stands to watch the class and then went back to the stable to see Christie and pet the horse (who was unattended in crossties, it seems) when the guard told him to “leave Christie alone” and then ripped off his badge, tackled him, almost suffocated him, showed him his gun and threatened to kill him and his father.

2 Likes

Etienne? I don’t think Nick would be able to spell that one.

2 Likes

Your avatar is how I feel after every page.

18 Likes

Since Centerline scores is down, I’m not sure how to find if Etienne of any of her horses did DaD.

I have no idea if she rode a horse named Talent. Just taking a wild guess at whoever he was talking about.

Hmm, I was thinking Christine Stuckelberger, but I do not believe she ever showed at Devon. Maybe Carol Lavell and Gifted? ‘Gifted’ is not too far a stretch from ‘Talent.’

10 Likes

Oh, he said Christie gave her a signed Breyer horse model of Talent. There isn’t a Breyer horse named Talent but there is a Breyer horse of Gifted. Good call, @Brown_Derby .

16 Likes

:rofl:

2 Likes

Good lord.

1 Like

Well, he certainly has a theme he’s working on. Let me guess. In the next chapter he’s whipped by the barn manager for not mucking the stalls properly. :roll_eyes:

It’s beginning to sound like a bad parody of a Dickens novel. “He was a poor lad of the stables…”

29 Likes

Oh that already happened in summer camp. You have things wrong. He’s not the “poor lad of the stables”, he’s the “prodigal trainer forced to work in the stables because he knows more than the employed staff as a teen so they force him to clean tack and stalls to put him down”.

Seriously, I’m so looking forward to your reading this book and very honestly, tell me where I’m getting any of this wrong. Everyone on this thread will appreciate an independent take of my take and his book.

I can send you a gift certificate to your local alcohol store. You’ll need a shot or something when you are finished reading.

26 Likes

At this point I firmly believe this book was written at a “sh!tstir” to simply get us (haters) to give him money. Well played! He could write 200 pages of poop, who cares if it is wrong? He got the $$ first. “Christie” can’t sue him because they aren’t a real person - just an amalgamation of all the people who have “wronged” him. Or their details are distorted enough that the real life Christine/Carole couldn’t sue.

Well played.

PS I only commented on public matters re: his family. D1 because I believe her to be the author of two of his reviews (“Sara”/“Saba”), and she has publicly defended him on a forum. D2 because he publicly posted and reshared that awful video of her behaviour, which is truly vile. Nothing was snooped. Everything is in the public realm, and relates to the topic of NP and his behaviour.

9 Likes

lholbrook’s Amazon review says: "The award that he sponsored at Dressage at Devon was one he made up based on his childhood horse who was not an upper level horse…and the award was discontinued when he stopped paying for it to be given."

But as I recall, he never paid the sponsorship fee. Anyone remember the letter he got from Devon discontinuing Chevy’s Cup?

5 Likes

Well, this book can further narrow down his “client base”, if he has one, to the really uninformed. The owner of the first camp he attended, and he names names and horse camps, can sue him if they are still around.

It also diminishes his experience if he made up the people who supposedly taught him/helped him along the way. I suspect that is why he doesn’t use full names except for that one woman.

I agree that he has involved his family members at various points. They are adults and he posts how they reflect his POV. It all is in the public realm and they could respond to it if they wanted. I haven’t mentioned his family at all but I have no qualms making comments here if their public comments refer to dressage in any form.

4 Likes

Oh, such pressure! :laughing:

Hmmm… Where have I heard this trite phrase before?
khan

6 Likes