<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Snowbird:
That’s why zero tolerance for drugs is the way to end it.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Oh, yes, because the current problems weren’t all caused by people looking for something that “doesn’t test”. Let’s outlaw everything so they get even more creative. You know what? I’d be glad to see the board thrown wide open, if it meant that just one horse was given ace instead of bled or dropped to the ground with magnesium or calcium. The absolute worst things are the ones you can’t test for at all, and they’re a product of the drug rules.
Do I think people should cheat? NO, of course not. Do I think some will? Absolutely yes. You can make all the rules you want, but you’re going to have to accept the fact that some people will not play by them. I’m not sure that everyone understands the fact that the sale or purchase of just one horse, or the gain or loss of just one customer can make or RUIN someone in this business. Protecting their home and family and business from financial ruin. Murders have been committed over less than that. Do you honestly think you can insure that people won’t cheat to save themselves because “it’s the right thing to do”? You have a lot more faith in human nature than I do.
Finally, people should not be discussed by name until they are listed officially under the suspensions. That’s rude, and some of the rumors going around are about people who haven’t even recieved a letter yet, so I’d say they’re at best premature, and at worst incorrect. Wouldn’t you prefer to have all the facts at your disposal before commenting on anyone in particular? Even the drugs in question haven’t been officially named yet, even when a suspension has been listed. Frankly, after all this discussion of a ‘pyschotropic drug’, the only place I’ve heard any mention of fluphenazine in connection to these rumors has been on this board. I, personally, like to deal with facts.