Anyone who knows me knows I am all about optics and social license.
But where do we draw the line between maintaining optics and letting the professionals do their jobs and make the judgement?
I am not just saying this about this situation, I am talking about the big picture. I mean, the crowd currently complaining was equally irrate over meaningless still photos of toplines, claiming the horses were unfit to ride when anyone with two brain cells knows that isn’t true. So do we fatten up our eventers to look like rotund ponies for the optics even when we know that isn’t what’s best for the horse?
I’m not attacking anyone here on COTH. This is something I think about a lot and I don’t have an answer.
In this particular CB instance, I feel very strongly that all the existing protocols worked and welfare was upheld. But I am also not opposed to the idea that yeah, maybe they could have stopped the horse on course for a quick check before letting him proceed. It’s a tough call. We can’t get to the point where we are stopping every horse every time it doesn’t look “pretty.” I get that this horse was more than just “not pretty”, but I’m referring to the potential for this to get out of hand.