USEF rule requiring microchipping?

Barbara and I were at the USEF Breeders Committee Meeting and were invited to sit at the table and help exchange ideas. Just know up front that USEF wants the microchipping to go into effect. They are very strong proponents and are working very hard to help it go into effect. The summation of why it was withdrawn at the USHJA Meeting was the lack of education. They felt that if they spent this year educating the general public (mostly trainers, riders, etc.) about microchipping that it would be easier to transition the mindset of the general public. They were facing some misunderstandings about microchipping that just seemed ridiculous. What we suggested at the meeting was that they start by requiring the chipping to compete in some of the big competitions - Finals, Indoors, etc. to simulate the expectations that the US riders faced when wanting to compete at WEG or like we faced when wanting to compete abroad with Validation. That way it would not bring the same resistance as an all-inclusive “forced” rule change. If you want to compete, you microchip. You don’t want to microchip, then it isn’t forced, but you won’t be able to compete. Then, the idea of it and understanding of the non-invasive nature of microchipping would naturally spread. Word would spread among professionals and the public. This would then make the implementation of an all-inclusive necessary rule change much much easier.

Other suggestions we provided included having a Competition Vet provide either a “free” or a “one fee” microchipping clinic at the competitions. Get a sponsorship from the company that produces the microchips that are acceptable and for a low fee, or even perhaps free for the first few horses, individuals can get their horses microchipped at the competition. Being able to see it done at the competitions would remove the shroud of mystery from the process for many individuals. We explained that if they could work out a sponsorship collaboration with the microchip company that we were certain that the company would be willing to provide educational videos about microchipping for USEF members. This extra effort would also show USEF’s serious nature and support for microchipping.

The biggest thing that Barbara and I learned from attending this meeting is that it really pays to attend. We were under the same impression that the removal of the rule change proposal at the USHJA meeting was a step backwards. But, it actually wasn’t. Instead of it going to the floor and getting shot down because of lack of education, they wanted to spend this year trying to educate people so it wouldn’t be a harder fight and would be easier to bring the rule change. We also learned that they are strongly seeking the support of the breed registries to educate their breeders and perhaps bring their own rule changes that require breeders to microchip. A lot of registries already do, but it is important they when they chip, they do it with the models that are acceptable to the FEI, as USEF has said that it is important to them that when microchipping goes into place, that their system is compliant with FEI. Why not speak with your breed registries and start this movement from the ground up? Tracking horses that are produced within the US is a huge priority for them, as evidenced by the requirement to microchip that many of them already have.

As to checking microchips, that was also discussed. USEF is working to move the competition system to where it is more and more compliant with FEI standards. They were also discussing microchipping in the context with the new YHS they are constructing. We were sooooooo excited about both subjects and it really sounds like they are working in the right direction. As with all monumental changes, it takes time to do it right. They also want to make sure that they don’t rush in and do it wrong. Crossing all their T’s and dotting their I’s. And the reason for the delay in the YHS is that they don’t want to do it in the same year as WEG or the Olympics. They want it to have their focus and not cause conflicts. I can definitely understand that. I told them we knew how complicated it was to schedule the Stallion Test, so I couldn’t imagine the challenges they faced. We are very excited to have been able to contribute to this discussions and fully support the efforts that USEF is making. Their biggest request? For the breed registries to get involved. Not involved campaigning for this to happen, because the ball is already rolling…but campaigning to educate people WHY these changes are necessary. They will be constructing a whole new area of their website devoted to Young Horse Competitions, Trainers, Microchipping, etc to educate people. Lets help make breeders aware when these tools become available and use our networks as breeders to help them implement these systems more seamlessly. I truly believe that change is in the air after attending the meeting and hearing the extremely excited, positive exchange on these subjects. We don’t need to fight for the change to come anymore. We need to help it take root and spread. :slight_smile:

(Please know that I have just spent 35+ hours flying back from Thailand and may not be super fluent but I hope I have explained well enough as this is something Barbara and I are also very passionate about.)

Dianehalpin: Thank you. That sounds good. I am behind you there. Please keep us posted here.
USSBHA: Nobody is throwing stones here. Simply asking questions and raising important issues. My ID is not in question here, horses are. Why is the US being referred to as “a big black hole” by major EU players? “Horses simply disappear over there…”, someone else told me there (a famous breeder),
“… I never show my best horses to US buyers….” and I could go on and on. We cannot keep going that way and yes, we need to hurry and change it.
Silver Creek: Yes, microchiping is great but it is second in line to the real problem. It is strange to me that only a handful of people understand that. Everyone is talking about microchiping when we should really be talking about the most important problems: ID! USEF needs to solve their registration/numbering problem first. Again, putting a microchip in a horse neck without proper info linked to it and linked to USEF’s database simultaneously is useless for show record. It was explained to me by a horse ID specialist here and once you understand the whole concept it makes sense. However, if you do it in the wrong order or incompletely, you will actually make it worse.
FYI: This MAJOR issue is over 20 years old. It has been a dead end at the Federation Level ever since the question has been raised. Might be time to think about another way out? Food for thoughts…

Quixotic: Barbara and I discussed that at length with USEF. They are using the microchipping as a step towards consolidating all these registration numbers into a UELN. There was an at length discussion about it muddying the waters if it just added another number to the mix. However, the way that they are looking at implementing it looks like it will be a helpful solution towards a UELN. Next step, a good database that can unify the tracking systems.

But, I TOTALLY agree with you btw. You are completely right about the microchipping and linking info. We hear the same from our EU contacts and the breed association/registries all the time. Hosting the Stallion Test which help stallions get licenses to sire foals that can’t be tracked is frustrating. Which is why we are super passionate about this topic.

Quixotic:

I am pleased that you are pointing out some of the critical system design issues related to horse microchipping. I am a breeder as well as an occasional show participant and I am dismayed by the overly simplistic view of most horse people with whom I have discussed this topic.

I also used to be a computer systems design professional and I am thus very sensitive to the fact that sticking chips in horses solves nothing. Not only do the databases you mentioned have to be sound, but procedures must be in place to scan horses and to link to databases in some meaningful fashion. I have heard nothing that indicates this part of the system is planned, let alone being implemented.

For example, will horses be scanned at all shows? Which horses? Will change of ownership applications at USEF now require a veterinarian’s affidavit of scan/verification of identity? Who will be permitted to access the database? Can a prospective purchaser ask their PPE vet to scan and to verify identity? What will the security precautions be (think about the possibilities, folks)? Will a horse’s ID number enable access to veterinary information? Is the USEF going to collaborate with US Dept of Agriculture?

USSHBA folks - Do you have a database/systems person involved? Has anyone contacted the AAEP or similar to get them involved in the discussion?

I am concerned about this topic and would be reassured if I heard of anyone actually tackling the system-level issues.

USEF or USHJA has had a data system presentation by Silver Creek. USSHBA has had a date systems design person speak and on call with our steering group. Only if the system is implemented by USEF will it have value to U.S. breeders as that is our national governing body tracking competition results.

Diane Halpin
Laurel Leaf Hanoverians

Quixotic, we can all agree that the scope of the problem is longstanding, and quite extensive in scope and consequence.

However, now that USEF is now willing to look at it with an eye toward creating solutions to improve the situation, it’s been very encouraging to see a wide range of individuals with expertise in many areas (including database operations) offer their support to the One Horse/One ID initiative.

We look forward to working with Silver Creek and others in formulating a cohesive action plan that will support those within USEF and the discipline groups who are taking this matter up, despite strong opposition from some quarters. It’s important to stand up and be counted at this stage of the game, and the USSHBA has provided a forum for breeders and others who are not necessarily members of the USEF or discipline groups, but who have a stake in the outcome, to participate in the process of implementing change.

If you are interested in doing so as well, we would welcome your help.

I think the OP’s question has been answered. The microchip proposal was not put forward to the USEF by its proponent, the USHJA. Education on the general topic of ID verification and dissemination of accurate information will be necessary to ensure that a future proposal will be supported.

[QUOTE=Quixotic;7420227]
Everyone is talking about microchiping when we should really be talking about the most important problems: ID! USEF needs to solve their registration/numbering problem first. Again, putting a microchip in a horse neck without proper info linked to it and linked to USEF’s database simultaneously is useless for show record. [/QUOTE]

This is an excellent point.

A nice jumper stallion caught my eye at the barn today, and tonight I did some research to find out more about his bloodlines. This is what I learned from his USEF info:
Foaling date: unknown

His breed is listed as a certain type of warmblood

His sire’s name is misspelled (one letter in the wrong spot, which changes the meaning of the word). HIs sire is a successful, very well bred licensed warmblood stallion in Europe, and represented by reputable US stallion service company. The sire’s name is also misspelled on promo material the owner/rider puts out.

His dam’s name is unknown.

No breeder info is provided.

There’s a YouTube video of this stallion, and his age is given. So someone knows when he was foaled. Or is it a guess ?

If this stallion gets chipped, it will be linked to USEF’s inadequate and incorrect info. Of what service is that to anyone ?

I understand that USEF can only provide the info they’ve been given,
but something has to change.

Thank you for this post Mardi. It does illustrate my point perfectly and is one of many possible examples. USEF knows this very well but will not do a thing about it. The “Microchiping idea” is deflecting the issue and wasting a lot of good people’s time and money, including yours and mine. Before you put doors on a house, you need walls on top of solid foundations. US breeders work extremely hard to get better at what they do and spend countless amounts of money doing so as well.
But yet our Federation does nothing to protect our efforts. It is time for change.

To add to the saga of the stallion I mentioned, the stallion service company who offers his sire’s semen has a video linked to the sire’s page. The link shows a video of a stallion by the same name, apparently in the same country where the sire stands. However the horse in the video is a trotting stallion (as noted on YouTube video description) and doesn’t resemble the warmblood sire by the same name at all.

Also, the stallion I saw in person and tried to find out more about is apparently not registered, licensed, approved by anyone.

So in my quest to learn more about him, I know one thing for sure: he exists.
Everything else is a mystery.

Mystery stallion caught my eye here…

Quixotic, you are right about USEF. What’s to be done?

An individual will not be able to change anything at USEF. An organized group, like the USSHBA could probably topple the balance into having something done. They even will possibly have to do it themselves and leave USEF out it. It would most likely be faster too! BUT, USSHBA will only have a shot at it if they get their wheels in motion about it, stay focus on the agenda (USEF will try and stir them away asking for research and papers and meetings, microchip, blah, blah, blah……Just a time buying, deflection strategy to avoid the inevitable….they have everything they need 10 times over) …and most important, do not get swallowed or scared by USEF politics. We shall see!!! I am behind them now (USSHBA) and I hope they will deliver. We have to keep pushing and keep this topic alive or it will never happen.

I think in Canada at least people will have to give in eventually and they might as well go gracefully - horses are livestock under the law and in the interests of disease control and food safety the PTB will mandate permit identification on all animals leaving their site of origin. Personally I would prefer a microchip over RFID ear tags.

I tried finding the approved chip list but never found it, can someone help with a link?

[QUOTE=Quixotic;7425221]
An individual will not be able to change anything at USEF. An organized group, like the USSHBA could probably topple the balance into having something done. [/QUOTE]

It also helps that the FEI requires it (one horse/one number), so the USSHBA isn’t totally alone on this.

The USSHBA is a discipline based organization. One of our immediate goals is to have the USEF adopt the UELN. As such we are looking for support from many breeders and registries, because the UELN would benefit all. I am currently waiting for a response from the AQHA which I have asked to join us in our quest.

If you have not read the USSHBA’s letter to the USEF, it is available in the current Chronicle magazine: 254479-Feb_10_2014_selected-pages[1]

Judy
USSHBA Steering Committee