I suspect because it’s endemic in Africa and short of depop repop would be very difficult.
I’m really not sure if you’re being intentionally troll-ish, or if you can’t read. The horse tested negative on Western Blot repeatedly. If there was a suspicion, there’s exactly ZERO harm in treating the horse while continuing to test. The test they’re basing this decision on is well-known for false-positives. Western Blot is not known for false negatives.
I’m completely ok with USDA being cautious. I am NOT ok with a horse being denied adequate veterinary care for 7 weeks while a family is struggling to get answers. For a family being asked to spend large amounts of money PER DAY, USDA BETTER be willing to communicate. That’s not the family being abusive or demanding. That’s what anyone with a large daily unplanned expenditure would do. That’s what ANY ONE OF US WOULD DO IF OUR HORSE WAS UNDER VETERINARY CARE. You can’t possibly tell me that if your horse was at the vet’s office you wouldn’t be checking in daily.
If it is treatable, why would Europe euthanize? This is just a horrible situation.
From this article, it appears that Germany would not permit the horse to renter either because it has to pass the CFT after a period of retests if it passes the blot test.
it also seems as if Glanders was basically eradicated from Western Europe for 60 years before a horse imported from Africa reintroduced it, so I can see why USDA is being vigilant. That said, the situation is completely awful, especially for the poor family.
Won’t be euthanized if shipped back to Europe. Here is the correspondence stating that from our case roughly a year ago.
From: Neubauer, Heinrich <Heinrich.Neubauer@fli.de>
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2018 10:02 AM
To: MT
Subject: Re: AW: Urgent-USA trying to euthanize horse for glanders that had negative western blot
Hi,
According to the data we have published so far the WB was always a little bit better than the CFT. The quality of the result is mostly dependent from the quality of the CFT antigen used and the experience of the operator. So laboratories have to prove their performance in proviciency tests. Let me explain it differently if a formula one champion will drive a FIAT punto it makes a difference. Ciao hn
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
MT
Are you able to advise if the western blot is more accurate than a CFT?
11/23/2018
MT
Hello I am looking at sending the horse back to Germany, let him recover and get a cft pre export test to USA before bringing him back to USA. If he goes to Germany, what is protocol when he arrives? Sent from my iPhone
11/12/2018
MT
This from one of the authors that wrote article on western blot.
11/8/2018
NH
Neubauer, Heinrich <Heinrich.Neubauer@fli.de>
Thu 11/8/2018 10:01 AM
Sirolas Glanders
To:
MT;
Flag for follow up.
Action Items
Hi,
you need to talk about the epidemiologic situation in Germany and US – both countries are free according to OIE. So the question now is where should the horse got infected? You have to proof that during the transport there was no chance for the horse to get infected. Talk to the company which transported the horse and make sure they provide a paper stating this (maybe also from the official vets that were involved at the two border customs as well). Then you need the data on CFT sensitivity and specificity that the US administration relies on. Adding up these data should finally result in a risk assessment that the CFT result is a false positive one (or a real positive if you cannot get all the information). According to our German law we than had to take into account animal protection reasons – here it is strictly forbidden to kill an animal without a very good reason. This is why we do a lot of tests additionally before we decide that the horse should be killed at all.
We do not know about the agents causing the cross reaction so we cannot help in identifying which antigens did cause the reactions in CFT.
This is all the advice we can give because finally the local administration is responsible and has to follow the local laws in the end.
I am sorry that we cannot help with better laboratory measures at all.
Ciao HN
Agent still willing to accept the horse?
Glanders is rarely treated, most are just euthanized. Not worth potential spread.
Concern with antibiotics becomes that it can mask/treat clinical signs but animal can still bacteria.
I also think that in the case the owners argument for antibiotics gets very skewed. He’s sick enough for abx but not sick enough to be positive for glanders. That doesn’t really fly with USDA.
Also, as a veterinarian, I can guarantee you that no vet wants to euthanize that horse. They are following the letter of the law as it’s written. They can’t deviate from standard protocol. But please do not vilify the USDA vet as wanting to euthanize this horse. That is an oversimplification of a complicated situation.
He is wrong.
Ok I know this mess isn’t the trainer’s fault, but this letter is a disaster and the LAST thing I’d want to send out to people. Did their lawyer ok this?
- It’s way too long. Make your point and move on.
- Adding seven explanation points after every sentence makes you seem like a child. I understand emotions are high but this is just not the way to get your point across.
- She shouldn’t be adding in little jabs about she knows “she is not your favorite person”, again it sounds immature.
- The trainer shouldn’t be adding anything about herself in there at all because she’s pretty irrelevant to them.
- Dont bother trying to appeal to sympathy. That’s not there job and they don’t care about that.
- Stop taking about your own beliefs and wishes. They don’t care and it’s especially insulting to veterinary professionals.
Honestly that whole letter is a mess and I’m sure it probably might make that trainer feel better to get some stuff off her chest but FFS put it in a box and burn it then. This is not going to help. I seriously hope this didn’t get sent out and that their lawyer will help them write something appropriate.
Horse passed the European version of the CFt before leaving Europe. The problem arose when the horse was tested with the US Cft that is only produced by a single manufacturer in the states, and the only one accepted by the USDA. The horse could very possibly test negative on the European CFt if that version of the test was administered today.
Who knows? There may be an incubation period, otherwise why would both countries test?
I haven’t had a chance to check protocol with sister (owner of the colt who went through this last year) or our contact at horse flight, but I believe European protocol is WB and CFT upon arrival then if their cft is problematic investigate further with IB… but when our colt was at a 1 on CFt and negative on WB a friend in Europe was more than willing to take the colt to his farm and let him grow up there, and this was approved by European authorities. Fortunately he finally tested negative and got to come home to our farm.
So… were there other horses on this flight? What happened to them?
If this horse has glanders, wouldn’t the others have been exposed? If there is an incubation period,and it was glanders, wouldn’t there be a chance the other would now test positive also?
My guess is they were held in quarantine an additional 10 days at owners’ expense and retested… and came up negative. At least that was the case with our horse in 2018.
Correct me if I’m wrong but if it actually was Glanders wouldn’t importing from the horse’s country of origin be shut down? Wouldn’t Europe be more than happy to get the horse back and prove he doesn’t have Glanders and this is just another false positive from US’ faulty CFT? I suppose those answers could be obtained through an autopsy as well but with their more thorough animal welfare laws I would be reaching out to european equine lawyers and get him back on his home turf where he’s already passed their tests. I’m fairly certain they would not euthanize upon entry, as stated in correspondence a few posts prior.
It is a zoonotic reportable foreign animal disease. You do not just treat it with antibiotics and go on.
”‹”‹”‹”‹”‹”‹And this horse may have tested negative before it mounted an immune response. I don’t have the exact timeline and I also don’t believe that the horse was denied care. It is in a quarantine facility. They just don’t put them there and forget them.
This not black and white. It will never be black and white even if the testing protocol is changed. Diseases and testing are not ever black and white.
Or horse was incubating disease. Sure it would be a low possibility but the risk is still there especially when you add in the wbc parameters and fever.
This is so sad.
There is a racehorse owner that brought in a horse from Europe and went through the same thing—and wrote an article about it.
They were able to get the horse out of quarantine and the horse lived and stayed in the US. I don’t know all the details but it might be a good idea to reach out to him and see if he has any suggestions from his experience. He is in California as well.
He is with Little Red Feather Racing LLC (easy to find on the internet) and his name is Billy Koch. Might be worth a try to see how he got his horse out.
Yeah, I agree. I wasn’t going to go there, but it was odd. Who cares/why mention they’re a “military family/dad was in/retired” she is a “tall skinny girl” All irrelevant and weird IMO.
But I do get emotions are running high and that the trainer is really trying to help a client.
Yep… that was a little eyebrow raising for me. She sounds like the last person I’d want involved representing my interests in this mess. It sounded so immature at first I thought the 15 year old wrote it herself and even then I would still say it’s still immature for a 15 year old.
I think the thing that bothered me the most was how she kept making it about herself and her role in this… Also like you said with all the sympathy shit… their JOB is to not care about all that crap. They HAVE to be by the book and follow protocols because that’s how all of our horses stay safe. Clearly this case sounds like a gray area but I get bad feelings about that trainer.
So I’m not sure why it has drug out this long. If one positive and the horse is done for, why has the USDA allowed the horse to continue to be held? Why retest and retest and retest if that one positive on the one test was enough to decide the horse’s fate?
Why would a horse be held and the USDA refuse to treat it while in their care?