Quote Originally Posted by GraceLikeRain View Post
Huge fees for intact dogs will push the small but responsible breeders out of business. It is hard to find people willing to pay $1k for a well bred puppy and even with that, breeders rarely break even. If a breeder is factoring in the additional annual costs they will either need to charge substantially more or they will elect to leave the market. Without responsible, ethical, and educated breeders, we will no longer have distinct breeds. unquote
second quote
I disagree. I paid twice that for both of the Chesapeakes I currently have. And will probably pay more than that for my next. My first Chessie was $400 and I spent way more than the difference in vet costs over her life span due to her poor breeding.
I also disagree. Most responsible breeders charge more than $1k a pup, and most responsible breeders have lengthy waiting lists for their puppies- they have no lack of buyers at those prices- because as mentioned, it’s well worth the cost to get quality.
Most responsible breeders don’t make any money at all on their puppy sales- they don’t breed to make money, they breed to better the breed. Most actually lose a lot of money once they factor in health tests and campaigning (showing) the parents in order to prove they are worthy of being bred. A “stiff licensing fee” for intact pets is a drop in the bucket in comparison to these sort of costs. Training and showing a dog to advanced titles in both conformation and some sort of or multiple performance venues isn’t cheap, nor are the extensive health tests that responsible breeders perform on their potential breeding stock.
that said, I’m opposed to dog licenses in general. The irresponsible people don’t bother to buy them, so they are just a money grab on the responsible people who don’t go around breeding irresponsibly no matter what, whether or not their dogs are neutered.