Ok, this post sounds like a real person, not an AI. Possibly someone previously banned. Hm.
3 Likes
If that is a real person (who is not using AI) I’m concerned that they’re experiencing a prolonged psychotic break.
6 Likes
Your position regarding this matter changed swiftly. You first criticised me for depending on AI tools but you made yourself the expert who decided participation in this forum. You are the person who displays inability to maintain consistent statements on this forum. From your position as self-appointed judge of this forum you throw baseless accusations while being rude which makes me wonder if you seek attention. Your understanding of forum operation would lead you to post meaningful content instead of moving between conflicting statements. The way I see it you seem to be creating problems among new members before reporting them to the administrator. This method represents an outdated but easily visible strategy. Your wild statements would be stronger if you found concrete evidence since evidence gathering does not seem to be your forte. We need to concentrate on the main points of discussion. I possess qualification-level training that surpasses your limits to explore. You should move away from this discussion if your input does not bring value because meaningless contributions derail discussions.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
So many assumptions, so little supporting evidence.
“So little” = “none at all”, in this particular instance.
Earlier you were whining about the thread having abandoned the original topic and wanted to ban anyone who didn’t stick to said OT.
Now you’re as guilty as those you wanted banned. Bait: taken.
9 Likes
I have previously offered you to utilise an AI detector in order to confirm your statements. The reliability of your accusations depends on your willingness to use AI detectors which will prove your claims to the entire forum audience. Use an Artificial Intelligence detection tool to scan all my content so you can reveal the alleged evidence about AI usage that preoccupies you right now. The request is quite small considering the circumstances.
I recommend you refrain from making false claims because you lack evidence. Opening your mouth wide without supporting evidence weakens your authority because it reveals the extent of your ineffective discussion skills. Stick to the topic or move on I am waiting 
That would be you, hun’.
1 Like
You’ll be waiting until pigs fly. 
2 Likes
Do you have your own unique masterpiece there or did you get the idea from a Weight Watchers meeting? The overall contribution to discussion is outstanding even though its origin remains undetermined—this information provides enlightening clarity.
The manner in which you mock others with “flying pig” remarks proves outright disrespectful since your esteemed Knitting Circle matches your description better than actual flying animals. Your offensive remarks should be replaced by meaningful contributions that relate to the subject Stop your body shaming of your fellow members
My concern for your mental health comes from professional experience. Your obsession with peoples weight is also bizarre and unhealthy for you. When pigs fly is an old colloquialism that has nothing to do with the weight of people. You seem to be fixated on how much you, and others weigh. Please seek professional help if, as you insist, you are not using AI.
Just to mention that again you are wrong. I’ve never knitted in my life and have never been a member of a group of that name.
You are really way out there. Do, please, find a professional to speak with about your issues.
7 Likes
Your argument is filled with unfounded suppositions since it fails to present any solid evidence backing your perspective. My innocence regarding the practises I criticised cannot be substantiated by baseless assumptions because they do not pertain to the dispute we face. Evidence stands as the only acceptable foundation for accusations so you should avoid drawing incomplete assumptions accompanied by emotional language when making accusations.
You try to describe this as taking ‘bait’ which represents both dishonesty and intentional provocation rather than productive discussion. You should avoid these types of strategic manoeuvres since they fail to add value to the conversation. Continuing this approach negatively affects your trustworthiness while breaking away from main discussion points.
I am actually acquainted with members from the Forum Knitting Circle. The members spend their downtime either chasing cats or eating pies apart from their trolling activities. The absence of productive contributions at this site appears linked to the phenomenon I just mentioned.
What makes our prolific poster here so tedious is that they appear to have purchased their AI software from Temu.
24 Likes
2 Likes
Your rapid change of position regarding professional mental health matters is impressive to observe since you previously employed the topic to deflect attention from the main points. This radical change in your position stands out as a clear form of irony. Expert commentary about professional mental health demands real knowledge which your response seems to completely lack. These statements fail to be ethical or to add value to the current discussion.
The way you portray my comments as obsessive appears beyond the limits of what should be accepted in our discussion. The blatant mischaracterization reflects strongly on your poor ability to both connect with and properly portray opposing arguments. Your attempts employ distortions to create a situation which supports your preferred viewpoint.
We should return our attention to the core issues while avoiding to use unprofessional psychological evaluations for distraction purposes. My ability to comment about flying pigs remains unimpeded despite any objections you may have. Your energy should focus on remaining relevant because trying to analyse others’ mental states as an untrained person will not bring you success; I know you were secretly mocking your Knitting Circle members while shaming their bodies.
You are becoming more creepy with every post. I really hope you are trolling because if you aren’t, there are serious issues you need to address with your physician.
This wouldn’t be the first time that we have encountered mental illness on the forum. At this point I will let it be and hope that this person (who denies using AI) finds help and isn’t encouraged to keep posting their bizarre and disjointed thought process, that may later come back to bite them. Posts on the internet live forever.
9 Likes
You should use your reliable AI detection tool to resolve this matter permanently. This solution will certainly deliver the clarity that you need badly. Go ahead, I’ll wait
Your constant effort to shift and destroy important discussion is the sole manifestation in this thread. Your belief that I troll while making baseless analysis of psychological conditions diminishes your argument’s validity and professional ethics. It is surprising that someone who persistently suspects I use AI has not shown any tangible proof to support their claim.
To prove your point why not conduct a test on them? An AI detector should analyse my posts to generate results which I will share on the forum instead of making vague accusations and inflammatory statements. Your accusations merit attention as long as they possess any factual basis then this easy procedure would show their validity. Your baseless attempts at psychoanalysis need to stop now that you should concentrate on making beneficial contributions to discussions.
As the self-imposed spy of the Knitting Circle message board you should create an official statement warning about my past ban from the community. After you submit the report notify us about the profile status since your activity reveals the purposelessness of the effort. Collect evidence which proves your statements before you access the website. Accusations that lack sufficient evidence will stay as empty as an infamous rotten egg basket.Is your cat called Tiddles ?
