AI or bot? It doesn’t read like something written by someone whose first language is not English, but it’s… weird.
4 Likes
I specifically declare I have no personal hostility toward Becks Nairn as my goal remains focused on protecting horses’ welfare. The priority of my work remains the protection of horses and the precision of information presented to the public. Becks Nairn provides dissection services and bill clients though he lacks the needed credentials and risks delivering deceptive information to the public.
Working professionals must evaluate any dissections and procedures handled by unqualified practitioners such as Becks Nairn. The individuals who conduct this work must submit their findings to scientific experts for evaluation to confirm both accuracy and reliability of the information.
Regulation is key. The standards of practise for veterinary procedures should match those that university graduates meet or surpass. The matter extends beyond targeting individual performers since it focuses on maintaining professional standards while protecting public trust and ensuring horse welfare through proper regulatory practises.
1 Like
One should pay attention to all conversations but we must not allow the manner of delivery to obscure genuine meaning. The situation requires serious attention because Becks Nairn and similar unqualified people carry out veterinary dissections for public payment. This poor horse welfare exists alongside false public information dissemination.
The intensity with which such concerns are expressed does not diminish their factual correctness. The performance of veterinary procedures by trained experts combined with accurate information about these procedures to the public falls within professional guidelines and not in the realm of personal animosity or emotional frenzy.
We need to preserve professional integrity since this matter surpasses any argument about concern presentation style.
1 Like
My deliberate use of the word “git” underline the immediate need to prevent unskilled individuals from carrying out horse autoptic procedures. Protecting horses and preserving excellent professional equine practise methods remains my main priority.
Performing these procedures by untrained individuals exposes animals to severe harm while spreading wrong information about the procedures. The term “git” served the purpose of drawing attention to this essential matter due to the need for competent practitioners with validated techniques.
1 Like
AI-written troll posts. Speaks in circles and says very little.
Also, Becks is a woman.
18 Likes
LOL. Not even good AI either. Slack.
8 Likes
Same poster, same nonsense has been appearing on the horse and hound forum too.
6 Likes
While I agree with you, this isn’t a reliable marker. Many real people miss letters when typing, especially on their phone, and miss it when the result is also a legitimate word. (she/he, the/he)
@Range_Rover delivery of the message absolutely does affect the perception of the content. The messenger also affects the perception of the message. Many people are automatically suspicious or dismissive of the content when the message appears to have come from AI.
3 Likes
The defence of uneducated FB Gurus performing unqualified horse dissections has attracted excessive sycophantic behaviour from individuals who protect these activities without recognised qualifications. People without peer-review experience undertake these activities to charge unaware customers.
Using artificial intelligence is easy to detect without expert intelligence because its usage is clear to any observer. Rest assured that all my written content stems from my own intellect because I possess easy-to-provide evidence for my human authorship. The education combined with training has equipped me to articulate messages at a high standard while giving instant accurate responses. I refuse to become an unskilled chameleon who admires others.
If your child needs educational instruction would you choose someone without teaching qualifications? The requirement for educated teachers in children’s education should extend to the practise of horse dissection being performed by only qualified professionals. Both animal health and public trust are at risk when animal dissection activities are conducted by unqualified persons.
Any profession needs experts who deliver authentic work. The integrity of our community requires us to support strict standards which benefit both our community members and the subjects. Do you understand?
I understand that errors occur when typing fast or using phone systems to type messages. The presence of mistakes in writing does not demonstrate either intelligence or authenticity within someone. Minimal mistakes within communication do not accurately represent the real personality along with the intellectual capacity of an individual. Human beings naturally make mistakes which do not diminish the importance of their genuine argumentative work for assessment purposes.
Now, dismissing content simply because it supposedly “came from AI” is a classic case of misjudgment. Professionals who understand artificial intelligence can easily determine when a piece of content has been generated through AI programmes. Trust me, it’s glaringly obvious. Writings produced by AI systems present machine characteristics through their designed mechanical structure.
You should evaluate yourself while having purposeful discussions based on facts instead of questioning people without proof that they are not truthful. Any valuable discourse depends completely on authentic expertise and honest source credibility. Do you understand?
If you are truly an expert in written communication and grammar then you can detect AI usage instantly and show the evidence publicly to everyone at this moment. Such evidence demonstrates both credibility and substantial strength. Otherwise, you’re just another sycophant. The revelation that I do not use AI operators will result in humiliation since such information could prove your assumption wrong.
The discussion should focus on unqualified persons cut up horses for profit but fails to show valid evidence in their claims.
I hadn’t seen this before, AI discussions aside, is the person doing dissections someone who is just getting horse parts in a field? Do they actually work in a lab? I actually DID work in a lab that got all the race horses that died in our state to do necropsies on. I got their front hooves for part of a post doc’s research project. I won’t go into all that but I was doing that work officially, under a grant funded project, at a well known university. --not in my spare time for fun, not sure that sort of thing is entirely legal around here (I don’t live in NZ). Sounds odd.
1 Like
There is nothing wrong per se with amateur dissection of animals. There may be a lot wrong with the conclusions drawn. You need to distinguish between the two. Merely doing dissections does not convey superior knowledge.
8 Likes
“The education”? I’m sorry but you are not “articulating messages at a high standard”. You really aren’t.
9 Likes
If you read it slowly, this sentence sounds exactly like what a robot would say.
“I. Am. Equipped. To. Articulate…” 
19 Likes
It really does.
2 Likes
The debate has taken a surreal turn because I face allegations that I employ artificial intelligence for defending my stance. The helpful features of my AI assistant do exist but we should move past theoretical aspects.lol
The person leading our opposition group lacks appropriate qualifications for research while analysing horses without providing any valid supporting evidence. Such a claim equals the declaration of becoming a master chef before entering a real kitchen.
My capability to provide evidence for non-AI argument support differentiates me from the unqualified horse dissector who lacks any credible sources in their claims. Supporters who follow this unqualified horse dissector have successfully diverted public attention away from the essential proof of qualifications.
I need to view written evidence which demonstrates that I am employing AI. Moving towards conspiracies would be undesirable so let us remain inside established reality boundaries. The evidence and credentials I possess differentiate my position from rival arguments.
So, Dear Funny Friends we need to focus on our main objective which is maintaining qualified people in positions of important responsibility. The true focus should rest on horse welfare along with professional integrity since these matters remain important.
Yep. Still very obviously AI generated content. It goes in circles.
There are any number of current and former professors on this thread. I am one of the latter. I would not have accepted these posts as written assignments.
15 Likes
It’s so weird. I’ve never read anything like it.
6 Likes
And who is leading what opposition group?
7 Likes
Easily done. Just re-read your posts.
8 Likes
