The field of veterinary pathology requires the same level of difficulty as human pathology does since it needs thorough education and training before professionals can gain their qualifications. It remains confusing why individuals without proper qualifications such as Becks Nairn and others can display expertise in conducting dissections and autopsies. These uncredentialed persons work without presenting any peer-reviewed evidence to support their statements or procedures.
Attendees pay money to receive factual information which turns out to be baseless misinformation. The observation of distressing details combined with unbacked amateur explanations should never be mistaken as legitimate educational content. The Irish educational organization EquiEd allowed Nairn to perform dissections during events although she seemed unqualified for this role. Her teaching responsibilities include anatomy and osteopathy despite the need for scientific credibility which she does not demonstrate in her work.
People are paying unverified potentially misleading information which prompts an essential inquiry about their reasoning to invest money in this content. When scientific studies lack peer reviews together with valid certifications and expert supervision the distribution of this work breaks down scientific standards of both trustworthiness and professional standards of responsibility.
