Like all things horse, what constitutes a good hunt horse prospect and or a “made one” is subjective. From what I have read in this forum by people who hunt in different parts of the country it seems their idea of hunting and their hunt country is a lot different then my idea of hunting here in the Mid-Atlantic, Md. N Va. SE Pa.
IMO and experience the number one factor is a horse has to have a good jump, a really good jump. Very athletic being able to figure out how to get up and over in just about any given situation. With or without the rider’s help and or lack of. The horse should have superior endurance because we have some pretty long runs over many jumps and tricky terrain. The last thing I want to worry about is if the horse is running out gas and the landing gear collapsing. In other words, the mind is willing but the legs are not.
We only work with TBs because that is not only what we breed but the only horses I prefer to work with after their racing days are over if they raced at all. Ours or others. I also like to train and run a couple of steeplechase horses (timber) from time to time. So hunting is a “natural” for most of them and a great way to train and get fit.
We have a fairly big farm by east coast standards in Cheshire hunt country. With “hunt style” jumps all around the property and through our woods. Or we can just meander around the neighborhood, or a short trailer to others.
IME and experience a good prospect can have all of the above. Be good on trials with a few others. But the only way to get a good idea if the horse can “handle” the big picture is to at least take them hound walking. Because things can completely change when the horse is exposed to a pack of hounds coming straight at them and or coming from behind and “fanning out” around at the last moment. The also have to be comfortable with being “part” of a large group. In our case anywhere from 30 to 75+++.
Standing quietly at checks is preferred but I don’t mind a good jumping horse that tends to jig and or be a bit of a handful at times. To me it is all about their jump everything else comes second. Most of their silliness will dissipate with time and experience.
IMO I don’t think there is a “set” rule for how long a horse needs to become a decent hunter. The ones I figure are worth the time and effort pretty much take to it from the get go.
My wife grew up hunting with Cheshire. She had the good fortune of having family that hunted and was in the position to buy really nice horses. She hunted “imported” Irish hunters, and various WB sport horses. Her hunt horse for the last 9 years is a TB that I bought out of a field for $1,000. He looked the type and I knew a bit about his back ground. Had never really been jumped. He took to hunting like a duck to water and is the BEST horse she has ever been on. We turned down an offer of $30,000 going into his third season. And this was in the middle of the world financial meltdown. We make our living with horses and it was very tough times. We desperately needed the money. So that should tell you the reason why good hunt horses are difficult to find and expensive to buy. At least in our neck of the woods.
Columbus, the breed of a horse is a good advertising point. But in the end IMO really doesn’t make much difference. I like TBs as I said before. By and large IMO they are a superior all around horse. Contrary to popular belief. To each their own on this. TBs for the most part are always “pleasing to the eye”. Sorry, I am a bit of a snob I like good athletic looking well made horses.
I think given your location it would be very difficult to “market” a potential hunter in this area based on what you are doing with them in your location. Even if they have been “fairly hunted” under hunt conditions in your neck of the woods. I say that knowing nothing about hunting in Minnesota. To get a good price for one would require being hunted around here and being “marketed” by a “known”. If someone were to “hire” me to bring a horse a long so as to market it for a good price would be expensive. The ends most likely would not justify the means.