[QUOTE=vineyridge;8172243]
Adding endurance back as a factor seems to me would lessen the dressage effect to some extent because people in long format days bought XC horses and then put dressage on them. Now it seems many people buy dressage horses and try and put XC on them. Until the type of horse changed again, the risk factors from tired horses would probably increase at the upper levels.
Unless I’m wrong, XC jumping style from speed and impulsion (TB type scope) is very different from the usual sj WB type power and scope. ERA is begging the FEI for more eventing specific dressage and sj. The FEI is not listening.
The more complicated the complex, the more WB ability is needed; but the distance and speed factors of the rest of the course seem work against WB ability. The speed studies seem to me to lead to this conclusion. To my thinking, this is a huge issue in XC.[/QUOTE]
Yes but ULR are learning that they still need a good bit of blood to be successful. I recent had a very well respected ULR tell me that he would be trying to buy my ISH except that he did not have at least 75% blood. That being said, you do not see many of the top seeking out the pure TB these days, but the dressage may be a part of that. I have found that the TBs can do well with the complicated questions - although purpose bred horses do have the upper hand, if the purpose part of the breeding is successful…
It often seems we Americans are one step behind the Europeans. They figured out that they still need a good bit of blood several years ago and we are just now catching up. Look at Jung thread and quotes from him regarding needing a good bit of TB and a cross country horse first. He also states (I believe) that the sort of horse he picks does not differ markedly from the sort he would’ve picked for the LF.
Trading Aces - what a horse and he did do reasonably well. Not sure why they sent him along as it could’ve been soundness issues that made him better suited for the jumpers/equitation classes.