**[quote=“AskMyAccountant.17, post:668, topic:798895, full:true”]
Question, just of thought. At least previously when other professionals, or, really now it’s become common in any case for the individual to release a public statement of apology and admission. Not just in regards to horse abuse, but I think of other instances in media/pop-culture, the guilty party releases a statement/video of apology (in many cases written by a PR team)
In this case, my question. Does AM owe “us,” those who are dissapointed and maddened by his abuse a statement. Let’s say for example, AM reached out personally to the parties involved like AC, PDF, USEF, Broussards… Ok, while owed, maybe not what will happen. But, let’s just say he did reach out privately to those he directly affected.
Does he owe the public a statement?
IMO, for his image it seems like that might be beneficial. But also IMO, I never know how to feel about public statements. Are they genuine? I don’t know. It seems like overall thats what is now expected to happen. But, in the terms or right and wrong, is it morally one way or the other if a statement is never released to the public.
** I personally detest and hope this human never touches/interacts with a horse again. I want our organizations to do the right things.
[/quote]
**
He may not owe the public an apology but he is a public figure ( not to mention US athlete on the world stage) and his likability is at an all time low.
If he has any hope of salvation for his reputation, image or humanity, he has to show remorse, regret, and apologize for his behavior, and acceptance of the consequences . Whether or not he is lying is irrelevant. At this point, his silence is deafening.
[Edit]