Another fatal Pit Bull attack....

[QUOTE=MustangSavvy;7499761]
Haha
I live in Boulder, I at a humane society. I am pretty sure I know a lot more about my area where I live and work, then you do. Boulder takes a long time to do anything about so called aggressive dogs. I have seen dogs come in on bite confinement six or more times, before the city acts. That is a lot. Boulder is one of the most dog friendly cities in the country. We have the green tag program which allows dogs to be off leash on all of the open space. Frankly, having dogs on leash in our extremely busy little city makes a lot of sense.

AC used to be in the shelter, but they have always been under the police. They are in the police station. They are not under some for-profit third party.

We are NOT constantly harassed by AC. I have not ever been harassed by animal control. IMHO we have some of the best animal control in the area and I have regular contact with lots of different areas surrounding Boulder, not just Boulder AC.

But, you know you obviously know more since you don’t live in the area or have regular interactions with AC and animal lovers. I am just some stupid and ignorant pit bull lover. ;)[/QUOTE]
Wow. Why so nasty? I have family and friends who live in Boulder. They feel differently than you do. In rankings of dog friendly cities, Boulder has scored low. I didn’t make that up. No need to go all Aunt Esther, is there?

[QUOTE=MistyBlue;7499736]
sigh Well of course all dogs shake.

The point was, terriers are known for shaking. And meaning business when they do it. [/QUOTE]

I apologize then, as I misunderstood what your point was. I thought you were trying to say that only PB’s shake.

I’m down with BSL. The best thing that could happen to this “breed” would be an outright, across the board ban. They need to fall off the radar for about 5 or 6 generations or so.

[QUOTE=JackieBlue;7499611]
Who’s talking banning or BSL? And whose Labradors are you talking about? ??[/QUOTE]

Uhm, it was mentioned earlier in the thread. (I can’t tell if you are serious or being sarcastically obtuse.) Both the banning of the breed… and that Labs are just so awesome was mentioned earlier.

Heres one of the posts thats brings up banning the breed.

[QUOTE=Appsolute;7498429]
Flame suite on - I am sorry, I know that there are people who “love the breed” and will defend them to their death. Its “bad owners” etc and never the dogs fault.

But in general I do not like pit bulls, I am all for mandatory sterilization and a phasing out of the breed.

I believe there is a REASON why Belgium; Brazil; Denmark; Finland; France; parts of Canada; the Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Poland; Puerto Rico; and Sweden have BANNED THE BREED.

Yes, some are very “nice pets” and some maul and kill family members at a rate unmatched by any other breed. They are large, very very powerful dogs, with nearly unstoppable drive when they go “berzerk” - even “bully advocates” advise that owners should carry a “break stick” in case things go awry.

Sure, chihuahuas are snappy, terriers can bite - but few other breeds have the power and the drive to kill humans.

And these countries have banned pit bulls, maybe that is part of the reason they do not have “aggressive-dog problems”, they aren’t scared to say that some aggressive breeds are not acceptable.[/QUOTE]

Heres another posts supporting BSL.

[QUOTE=Sswor;7498443]
Totally agreed, Appsolute.

The world is full of irresponsible parents and unattended children and dog owners who ignore leash laws and also full of dogs who DO NOT kill and maul and maim when faced with those circumstances.

Pit Bulls are a massive public safety issue, and a 100% avoidable one. It’s time we all stand up for our basic right to walk down a public street in our own neighborhoods without fear of being mauled or having our pets or children killed because some a hole has to own a breathing lethal weapon.[/QUOTE]

Another, particularly ignorant, post pro-BSL.

[QUOTE=Sswor;7498624]
We can make it very simple and just ban them by appearance. The the pit bull people can relax knowing their “breed” isn’t being singled out. Ugh.

I love how there’s a faction of people who defend a dog who killed a kid. That’s insane. Truly. Do you ever step back and look at yourself? Do you see the crazy?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=RaeHughes;7499376]
If you DEFINITELY cant identify a Pit, how do you know that the loveable child hugging dogs that you claim are exemplary models of perfect pits? Yep, they may be as the more general “dogs” (and good on your training and their core temperament - seriously meant!) but you have self-identified them as Pit Bull Terriers. In most cases of these attacks, the dog-owners have self-identified their dogs as PBTs - everyone who is passionate about this breed but cant accept that there has been a lot of bad/random/with-absolutely-no-sense breeding/handling/“training” with that breed are doing a dis-service to their beloved dogs.

Shhheezz - you can id a BC or a BCX, a Lab or LabX, a Boxer or Boxer X, a GSD or GSDX, a mastiff or mastiff X (and, yes, I can!). SO, if the PBT is such a great dog, why cant you positively ID it? If you can, then you can stop this uncalled for negative impression of your dog. If you cant, well great that your dog is good but you cant comment on the breed.

I have interacted with a number >20 owner-identified PBTs or PBTXs. I have met two that were really great loveable dogs - both over 6 years old when their very conscientious owners relaxed finally. NONE were left alone with children or other pets. NONE. So, yes, highly disciplined owners with very well positively disciplined, well-exercised, obedient dogs - who knew very well what the dogs were capable of and had them before relationships/children/etc who were not going to just give up on their dogs. (One was competing as an obedience dog - in the ring, during the stays, the handler had permission from the kennel club for it to wear a muzzle. Just in case. No-one ever suspected that it would suddenly turn it was just a precaution.) How many are still alive? TWO! The others “turned” - of the 18+ I had the vaguest suspicion that they might “turn”, 3 - and they were last-chance-rescues who really were on their last chance. One guy, when I met him on one of our walks, was in tears as he had had to put his beautifult dog down - it had killed his cat that had been around from a puppy. His child was less than 4m away when the attack happened, under parental supervision. He simply couldnt take the chance and that dog had shown absolutely no evil intent before. Heck, it had sat there while a cat swung off it’s face for a reason only known to the cat! All it had done was cry and look pleadingly at “Dad” - who had rescued him.

I am a BC and Lab lover - fanatic some people may say :D. Passionate about both of these highly intelligent, trainable and lovable breeds. Would I recommend them for everyone - heck no! Well, not the BC :). Not by a long shot - must be very hard for a human to have a dog more intelligent than them. But, hey, BCs were bred to nip (if used as a cattle dog), to strong-eye a sheep, to move sheep with their energy/body language etc. Labs - phew! Have you looked at those teeth? The strength of the neck - well, they need that to carry the swans out of the swamp (ok! my favourite lab of all - a large black English Lab :).)

IMO, ALL dogs need to be positively disciplined to live within the present human society in which we all live. These animals have evolved with modern human over thousands of years - conmensual evolution IIRC. Too many of us are distant from the original uses of these animals and we all need to accept and work with that.

However, no-one does their favourite breed any favours by completely denying any negative traits. Further, if your favourite breed is involved in a mauling, please dont try and deny that is one of your favourite breed. IN NZ, at the moment, we have a # of people calling their dogs “Lab/Boxers Xs” when, well, there aint no lab in that dog![/QUOTE]

And theres the post about how awesome Labs are and how they (or a mix) could never be involved in a mauling cuz you know, they are Labs. Talk to anyone who works in a vet office or with a large number of animals about how awesome Labs are. Do I think they are bad dogs inherently? No… I think they are very common pets and owned by people who shouldn’t own a dog. Same as pits.

During the last year, in my neighborhood, cows were getting mauled by a pack of three dogs. Some of the attacks were fatal. Full grown cows. A lab, a LabX and a GSD mix.

[QUOTE=khall;7499922]
Jackie, here you go
http://mabbr.org/pit-bull-ownership/the-truth-about-pit-bulls/

shay, dogsbite is a very biased site against pit bulls.

I want to know those of you saying how bad pit bulls are, where are you getting your statistics and numbers? Because when I do research looking at credible sites, even the CDC has re-vamped their original dog bite research, the credible sites i.e. not the news! are saying most times breed cannot be determined. http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dogbites/dog-bite-related-fatalities/

Another good credible source http://www.companionanimalpsychology.com/2013/12/can-fatal-dog-attacks-be-prevented.html

and another
http://stubbydog.org/2011/07/when-dogs-bite/[/QUOTE]

You can’t cite stats from a group called IncrediBulls, a Bully breed rescue, and call it credible in this instance. It’s not a disinterested third party.

And you say the CDC has re-vamped their original dog bite research and then you post a link to the National Canine Research Council site. Not the same thing. The CDC has NOT revamped their original research. That study remains intact. It has NOT been retracted or changed or recalled. They put less time into identifying dog breeds in bite cases. But don’t be confused - dog bites and Dog bite related fatalities (DBRF) are 2 entirely different things. This is one of those “sleight of hand” things that many Pit Bull proponents use and Pit Bull lovers blindly grasp when they see it in print. While breed may not factor in much when it comes to overall dog bites and the blame can solidly be placed on owners’ shoulders (ALL dogs can bite), breed IS a factor in DBRF. NOT all dogs are capable of killing and there are idiot owners across the board owning every breed and mix, but a specific type of dog is involved in the majority of DBRF. It’s just fact.

And one more time for the cheap seats, dog bites and DBRF are 2 different problems and are treated as such.

[QUOTE=VCT;7500305]
Another, particularly ignorant, post pro-BSL.[/QUOTE]

I find all of your posts particularly ignorant considering you advocate employing a killing machine as a babysitter.

[QUOTE=VCT;7500305]
Another, particularly ignorant, post pro-BSL.[/QUOTE]

I find all of your posts particularly ignorant considering you advocate employing a killing machine as a babysitter.

threedogpack, no problem! I probably didn’t explain very well either. :winkgrin:

There have been a few mentions of banning the breed. But it does seem there’s been a decent amount of those against the ban too.

I am definitely not for a ban of any breed/type. I don’t think it’s ever a good idea to try to legislate common sense.

And I know there’s a lot of people who poo-poo the whole “slippery slope” thing, but they’re also the same people who said that NOBODY could EVER force banning or taking away anything that wasn’t obviously abusive.
So take a look at the NYC carriage horse ban. It’s abusive for horses to work.
Oh but they’ll never set a precedence and ‘slippery slope’ into other areas!
Check out their agenda for stopping carriages and other “entertainment” uses for horses in all other cities.

But they can’t just legally steal your animals!
Check out the thread on “rescue or theft” where the woman stole someone’s dog and the court decided she didn’t steal it.

There’s nothing inherently wrong/bad with pit bulls except:
*thug type owners
*ignorant, cheap owners (just want one litter, speutering costs too much)
*ignorant, internet reading, unable to accept reality owners (but MY dog saves kittens so ALL dogs must be like the ones I’ve met and here’s a pitbullsarewonderful website to educate you to my thinking!)

All are just as responsible of the others for the plethora of poor handling that causes a high risk breed to become media-blitz targets.

Where to get actual information? If it can’t be found unbiased online, then you get of your tuckus and research. Might mean having to read through reams of boring crap that you’ve paid to have copied sent to you, but the information is out there.
Insurance institute research goes by reported and treated cases that resulted in health insurance claims.
These cover ONLY those cases where the person required medical attention, it rates the level of attention and then they only list by breed those instances where the dog was caught, confiscated and either had existing vet records or was seen by a vet while being held.
A vet guess as to breed is a little more accurate than a police officer’s or witness’s guess.
Those listed as “mix” are often pit crosses, despite websites and blogs claiming they could also be Dogos or Malaysian Crested Ridge Dogs or whatever extremely uncommon breed du jour.
Not to mention the “can’t be determined by sight” means “we don’t have proof of parentage.” Not uncommon for those to be woops dogs, shelter dogs, etc and due to the poor reputation of pit types those guesses are fudged on the side of caution.
As for unregistered dogs, I’d hazard a cautious guess that maybe 1 out of every 100 pit types reproducing have breed papers. And those registered by licensing…owners fudge those all the time. Insurance often will not cover a home with a high risk breed, if they do they often require higher costs and landlords rarely allow them.

An enormous help to all pits everywhere would be for all the responsible owners of them to take their heads out of the sand and stand up for their dogs as opposed to making unfounded excuses for them. If they don’t want the general public trying to force local goverments from banning these dogs, they have to start being seriously realistic about them. Their current “it’s the media” and “it wasn’t a pit, it was a ______” and “they’re nanny dogs!” methods haven’t improved anything one bit. And it’s sad, because they love their dogs (as well they should) and they’re shooting themselves in the foot as they drag their breed down instead of helping them.

[QUOTE=VCT;7500295]
Heres one of the posts thats brings up banning the breed.[/QUOTE]

I say sterilize them - Personally, I agree with Belgium; Brazil; Denmark; Finland; France; Canada; the Netherlands; New Zealand; Norway; Poland; Puerto Rico; and Sweden.

They have proven to be an unsafe animal. Be it because of bad breeding, bad owners, lack of culling etc - but these dogs have proven time and time again to be dangerous.

I will point out though, I proposed sterilization, not a mass gassing of the dogs. Love your pit bull? Fine, you get to keep them, but not breed them and make even more pits to “fall into bad hands” or whatever else makes these dogs kill at rate so much higher than other breeds.

During the last year, in my neighborhood, cows were getting mauled by a pack of three dogs. Some of the attacks were fatal. Full grown cows. A lab, a LabX and a GSD mix.

Also in your state in the last year:

http://www.abc2news.com/news/state/pit-bull-adtoped-in-baltimore-attacks-woman-boys-in-york

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region/2013/12/14/Animal-Friends-puts-down-pit-bull-after-two-attacks/stories/201312140100

http://www.yorkdispatch.com/ci_25315912/police-pit-bull-attacks-woman-dog-york-city?source=rss_viewed

http://articles.mcall.com/2014-03-12/news/mc-c-upper-macungie-pit-bull-bite-greyhound-20140312_1_upper-macungie-township-pit-bull-owner-dog-bite

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2014/01/17/police-taser-newly-rescued-pit-bull-after-dog-attacked/

http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/local/boy-woman-attacked-several-dogs-donora/nfMCY/

http://www.wgal.com/news/susquehanna-valley/lancaster/police-woman-attacks-restaurant-clerk-after-pit-bull-attack/22367882

http://www.delcotimes.com/general-news/20140114/police-pit-bulls-attack-woman-yorkshire-terrier-in-upper-darby

http://lancasteronline.com/news/owner-of-pit-bull-cited-in--year-old-boy/article_d7060690-0f6b-5f84-8f0f-cf43ed8d8ee6.html

http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/Local/Stray-pit-bull-attacks-2-people-small-dog-in-Salisbury-Twp-police-say/18417874

[QUOTE=Sswor;7500336]
I find all of your posts particularly ignorant considering you advocate employing a killing machine as a babysitter.[/QUOTE]

I don’t see how your post could be considered ignorant.

To make it perfectly clear, I do not support breed specific legislation or any breed or type bans or even breeding restrictions.

In America, breeds come into and fall out of mainstream favor. For awhile, it has been pit bulls that have been in favor, and I’m looking forward to when another breed takes its place as the “in vogue” dog. Pity the breed that become the new fashion statement, though.

It so much is a “people” problem - all of it.

During the last year, in my neighborhood, cows were getting mauled by a pack of three dogs. Some of the attacks were fatal. Full grown cows. A lab, a LabX and a GSD mix.

[QUOTE=MistyBlue;7500435]
Also in your state in the last year:
http://www.abc2news.com/news/state/pit-bull-adtoped-in-baltimore-attacks-woman-boys-in-york
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region/2013/12/14/Animal-Friends-puts-down-pit-bull-after-two-attacks/stories/201312140100
http://www.yorkdispatch.com/ci_25315912/police-pit-bull-attacks-woman-dog-york-city?source=rss_viewed
http://articles.mcall.com/2014-03-12/news/mc-c-upper-macungie-pit-bull-bite-greyhound-20140312_1_upper-macungie-township-pit-bull-owner-dog-bite
http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2014/01/17/police-taser-newly-rescued-pit-bull-after-dog-attacked/
http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/local/boy-woman-attacked-several-dogs-donora/nfMCY/
http://www.wgal.com/news/susquehanna-valley/lancaster/police-woman-attacks-restaurant-clerk-after-pit-bull-attack/22367882
http://www.delcotimes.com/general-news/20140114/police-pit-bulls-attack-woman-yorkshire-terrier-in-upper-darby
http://lancasteronline.com/news/owner-of-pit-bull-cited-in--year-old-boy/article_d7060690-0f6b-5f84-8f0f-cf43ed8d8ee6.html
http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/Local/Stray-pit-bull-attacks-2-people-small-dog-in-Salisbury-Twp-police-say/18417874[/QUOTE]

And this is what happened in MY neighborhood last year:

http://halfmoonbay.patch.com/groups/police-and-fire/p/horse-attacked-by-pit-bull-in-montara-field

I have had horses in Montara (very small town) for 25+ years, and had never heard of a dog attack.

A pit bull attacked a horse in Montara…A witness tried unsuccessfully to pull the pit bull off the horse, Rosenblatt said. The dog was finally dislodged when the bystander hit it in the head with a rake, she said.

The horse, which was bleeding from its neck and legs, survived the attack and was taken to Bayhill Equine

I spoke to my neighbor, she said it was terribly frightening, and that it actually took a number of people hitting (hard!) the dog with rakes and shovels before it stopped attacking the horse and ran off.

Oh my God. If a dog attacked my horse and I was there with implement in hand, it would not be ABLE to run off. No doubt about it. I think I’d flip. my. $hit.

[QUOTE=JackieBlue;7500706]
Oh my God. If a dog attacked my horse and I was there with implement in hand, it would not be ABLE to run off. No doubt about it. I think I’d flip. my. $hit.[/QUOTE]

My dog (when he was a pup) tried to chase and nip at my mini’s hocks. Ran off like a little b!tch when mini turned around and charged him! Snaked head barred teeth and all. :lol:

[QUOTE=MistyBlue;7500435]
Also in your state in the last year:

http://www.abc2news.com/news/state/pit-bull-adtoped-in-baltimore-attacks-woman-boys-in-york

http://www.post-gazette.com/local/region/2013/12/14/Animal-Friends-puts-down-pit-bull-after-two-attacks/stories/201312140100

http://www.yorkdispatch.com/ci_25315912/police-pit-bull-attacks-woman-dog-york-city?source=rss_viewed

http://articles.mcall.com/2014-03-12/news/mc-c-upper-macungie-pit-bull-bite-greyhound-20140312_1_upper-macungie-township-pit-bull-owner-dog-bite

http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2014/01/17/police-taser-newly-rescued-pit-bull-after-dog-attacked/

http://www.wpxi.com/news/news/local/boy-woman-attacked-several-dogs-donora/nfMCY/

http://www.wgal.com/news/susquehanna-valley/lancaster/police-woman-attacks-restaurant-clerk-after-pit-bull-attack/22367882

http://www.delcotimes.com/general-news/20140114/police-pit-bulls-attack-woman-yorkshire-terrier-in-upper-darby

http://lancasteronline.com/news/owner-of-pit-bull-cited-in--year-old-boy/article_d7060690-0f6b-5f84-8f0f-cf43ed8d8ee6.html

http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-lehighvalley/Local/Stray-pit-bull-attacks-2-people-small-dog-in-Salisbury-Twp-police-say/18417874[/QUOTE]

I bet you didn’t google for Dog attacks in xyz, did you? No, you used the term pit bull. The media knows this. It doesn’t matter to them WHAT the breed is. Pit bull attacks! sells better than black labrador attacks. The media is no longer about telling the news. They are about selling advertising and therefore viewership. If you think ANY of them give a damn about what the breed is, you are a fool (you, the collective you not MistyBlue in particular).
Eyewitness testimony is notoriously faulty except apparently, when it comes to determining the breed of the dog. Then apparently, it is just soooooo accurate.

As for how I determined that my dog was a pit bull, well, one of them was AKC. Is that sufficient for you?