@skydy,
Thank you for the thoughtful response.
When the US slaughterhouses were open and had inspectors funded, what happened to the horse meat? I’m assuming it was exported, and I’m also assuming that it was profitable or it wouldn’t have happened.
@ASB_Stars,
Here’s where I struggle with your argument: In your mind, what is the difference between euthanasia and slaughter? Are they both morally objectionable, or is just slaughter objectionable? And is slaughter objectionable in and of itself, or because the profit motive leads to abuse/inhumane conditions?
And finally, what’s your vision for a world where slaughter is outlawed? Including shipping horses over the border? First of all, what do we do with all the unwanted horses that there aren’t homes for? Starting with the 50,000 horses in BLM holding pens - even the most cock-eyed optimist has to agree that there are not homes for them all, and the ones still running free continue to breed. In this post slaughter world, what happens to a OTTB gelding claimer with a low bow and a poor prognosis for soundness?
You say you want to make breeders responsible for the horse they breed for their lifetimes - even if that were possible, how would that play out? You’d eliminate a majority of hobby breeders, for sure, but what is the long time result of this policy? Fewer breeders means athletic, desirable, purpose breed horses will skyrocket in price. What will happen to the market for low to mid price horses? Where will I get I nice local horse to trail ride, foxhunt and take a few lessons on?
I am not sure this is the way to eliminate horses suffering; the unintended consequences of this policy might cause more suffering than the initial problem.