If you rode like a hunter up to an Intermediate table, you’d get seriously hurt. I’m not trying to be flippant, but the two sports don’t compare and trying to make eventers like hunters or hunters like eventers won’t fix the problem.
Many eventers can string together 8 jumps in a good distance, so I disagree with that statement. The two videos linked show a horse that was overfaced (and a lack of scope) for the level and a horse that was lame – bad examples within our sport, sure, but not representative of the quality within our sport as a whole.
To be competitive at the higher levels you HAVE to be fast between the fences. Just about every horse that leaves the start-box is in a barely controlled bolt -exception being the true masters like MJ - who are extremely rare in the sport. Then you have these technical questions you have to dial back to a “show jumping canter” for in a matter of seconds, and then you have to make time by going into sixth gear between fences… This is hard to do smoothly even on a horse with no training holes… Which is part of the reason why eventing has seen such a rise of heavy bitting in the last 10 years…
This is what modern eventing is now.
The sport is dangerous. The jumps and how we arrange them is dangerous. The courses are pushing the limit of what horses morphologically are capable of doing within the realm of safety. Even the video posted by LockeMeadow of the 2012 Prelim vs the 2016 Prelim - there’s a big difference in the SJ course despite both being within specifications. The margin of error is too small, and it’s awful that a mistake can get riders and horses killed. That mistake doesn’t always come from an unratable horse either; think of the near misses this sport has had at the top levels the last five years (anyone remember the Andrew Nicholson crash at the hanging logs a few years ago?).
It is not the JJ’s job to be looking out for dangerous riders. They are volunteers. Most of them have some level of eventing know-how, but the job of looking for dangerous riding falls on the Stewards. We could tighten up qualifications but we’d still have people (trainers, parents) pushing riders up the levels. There needs to be a better system for coaches and trainers to say “No, you’re not ready” vs being “Yes” men. There needs to be less level creep because even in 10 years the courses are completely different. I walked my first recognized Training level XC course in the early 2000s. Just this summer, I walked the course again with a friend who was debuting at Training there. I remember my course and this new course was tougher, significantly more technical, and required some serious flying to make the time. I finished my course within time and hadn’t even tapped into 2nd gear on my horse - watching my friend it was really eye opening to see just how much the sport has changed, especially the lower levels.
Focusing on the frangible and collapsible fences, doing studies ($$$$$$$$) on the readability of fences, particularly table types, trying to find designers that are forward thinking and up-to-date on all the newest technology and advances… Sometimes I feel like the sport is hanging on to old customs and very outside the ring of modernity.
There’s a lot of problems in this sport. It’s not just one issue causing all of these awful accidents. :no: There needs to be more transparency, and more movement by our Safety Committee to analyze each of these cases and figure out how, going forward, these tragedies can be prevented. There are going to be some hard answers coming soon to our sport, even harder if things don’t change.