A friend forwarded me a sale ad about this horse, but I am in no way set up to house a stallion at the moment. However, I think his bloodlines might make a good addition to someone’s sport breeding program. He’s got good conformation; I really like his shoulder and he has soft, kind eyes. And he’s going for practically a steal of a price.
Thoughts on his pedigree? A friend of mine purchased him, and he has been at the barn I board at. So far he has been super sweet and totally uninterested in the ladies. Not that that won’t change tomorrow. He is very fancy. Keeping him intact is always being evaluated. Thanks for any insight!
What’s the criteria being used to stand this horse at stud? Will it be used for race breeding also? Has it done anything and have a show record? Proven soundness? All that is much more important than the pedigree. Pedigree looks fine but nothing stand out.
@WB_Mom please, please let me know how things go with him! I really, really like him. Even though I am in no way set up for a stallion at the moment, I actually contacted the seller about a week ago but never heard back. Now I know why
AWESOME news!! Please keep us updated on him, does your friend have COTH? Does she know there is a little fan-club for her boy here? Would love some photos…
A lot of eventers like MdO. I prefer his sire El Prado for big, tall, expressive movers. Usually great canters. MdOs have a staunch fan club in flipper circles since they tend to be classy and well put together. I don’t always like how MdO offspring move, I think his sire is much more consistent (IMO!). The damline is very sport oriented, that double to Halo and by proxy HTR would make any eventer paying attention to TB pedigrees turn their head. I would imagine with a damline like this, this horse can really move, but it is just a guess. More Than Ready has several horses that I’ve seen go onto sport careers but in terms of sport his impact is still relatively young, though he passed away this summer. I always liked the type he passed on, seen more than a couple advertised as “WBs in a TB body” - a term that annoys the crap out of me but, applies. And of course, Rahy is worth mentioning too as he has shown up now several times (usually on the damside) in TBs that compete at UL.
As this is not my horse, I can’t comment on any breeding decisions. I was just asking for any input on his breeding, good and/or bad. Thanks for the information!
Not to be a curmudgeon, but Medaglia D’Oro and More Than Ready have sired more than 5,000 foals worldwide in the past 20 years. Rahy, Blushing Groom, and Nureyev appear in numerous current pedigrees. There isn’t a single aspect of the stallion’s pedigree that isn’t easy to find in today’s TBs.
I wasn’t going to reply until I reached your assertion that your description applies to “easily 90%” of Thoroughbreds in the U.S. at this point. I cannot imagine where you’re looking for horses if that’s all you’re seeing.
Sure, compared to the average warmblood, TBs usually have less bone. And they’re more likely to be level than uphill. But long, soft, pasterns and one funky front foot (I don’t even know what that is??) are not the norm in today’s TBs.
For reference, I also see a LOT of TBs. I saw about 50 yesterday, and that was an average day. As someone who breeds and races Thoroughbreds, it pains me to hear the entire breed characterized as something it’s not.
Generally speaking (not intended to mean you) people who are looking for TBs to retrain tend to visit the lower end tracks looking for horses that are free or cheap. Most horses that race at those tracks aren’t good enough to succeed elsewhere. They’re the low end specimens of the breed and often they look it. The model for today’s TB can be seen at tracks like Keeneland, Belmont, Del Mar, Gulfstream, etc. It’s a very different look.
We have to remember too that TB bone tends to be more dense, so what they may lack in physical circumference, they make up for in density.
The “one funky front foot” actually is quite common, it’s the whole high/low scenario which, IME, is found much more in TBs than other breeds. That often gets compounded by poor farrier care, where the farriers just say “well that’s the way he is”, and don’t do enough (or anything) to manage the foot that’s more upright, or that tends to run forward with crushed heels.
But no, long soft pasterns? Not a common, or accepted trait in TBs
Lower neck tie-in? Compared to WBs, absolutely! But it’s because WBs have been bred for Jumpers and Dressage and those require a higher neck connection do the upper levels well. Purpose-bred TBs for those sports also have higher neck connections. A Hunter-bred TB will not.
An anatomist published some papers about how Northern Dancer passes on congentical cervical vertebrae malformations and was allegedly met with death threats from the TB industry. It has also been said it goes as far back as Diomed. So basically every TB ever.
“Generally speaking… people who are looking for TBs to retrain tend to visit the lower end tracks looking for horses that are free or cheap. Most horses that race at those tracks aren’t good enough to succeed elsewhere. They’re the low end specimens of the breed and often they look it. The model for today’s TB can be seen at tracks like Keeneland, Belmont, Del Mar, Gulfstream, etc. It’s a very different look.”
Speaking of-- There are several factors that make the colt I originally posted about unique. First: He is very well bred, by Goldolphin. Second: He was offered for sale at a very reasonable price, one which made him available to the wider sport horse market. Third: He is still intact, not gelded.
It’s very rare to find a thoroughbred with all 3 attributes, with so many of the bloodlines coveted by sport breeders. Which is why I think it would make him an excellent addition to the market as a sport stallion.
I can’t imagine a current day TB pedigree with a sire appearing 6 times in the first five generations. Or even 5 times. I don’t believe I’ve seen either one (which is not to say they don’t exist.)
Stripping stopped being done probably 6-8 years ago, when breeders realized that although it appeared to work initially, most foals later “outgrew” it. You probably won’t find this any more palatable but now front leg deviation is usually treated with screws. In most cases, the connections at the track are unaware of these corrections which are usually made in the first 12-15 months of a horse’s life. The intent is twofold: to make the yearling look correct for a sale, and to enhance the chances of long-term soundness. Unless you’re planning to breed the horse, whether or not the procedure was done shouldn’t make a difference.
Sometimes you see European or Australian horses with Northern Dancer 4 times in the first 5 generations. Yet Americans love to hold up the European and Australian breeding as superior to our own American horses.
I do exactly what you are suggesting on the regular and rarely see what you are describing to that extent. Yes, lots of inbreeding, but not 4x ND 4x Mr P.
However, I pulled up today’s results on Racing Post and only had a to click on a couple winners before finding this example of that traditional Irish breeding horse people covet:
I don’t need to go to FB to look up pedigrees. I look them up every day. Now it seems you’re saying that mulitple stallions will show up multiple times in a pedigree? Sure, but that’s quite a bit different than 1 stallion 6 times in 5 generations which is what I previously understood you to say.
Again, how would track connections disclose something they don’t know? You’re complaining about something that simply isn’t possible. The fact that your friend was able to spend two years training and competing a TB with a previous limb correction to a “big sale” seems to support my assertion about soundness since the surgery was only discovered later when xrays were taken. Fwiw, if the correction (or the screw!) was seen on xray years later, it was done wrong.
Most people who flip OTTBs are looking for geldings. I shouldn’t have assumed.
My last comment.
Most people looking for OTTBs to retrain want a horse that’s free or very inexpensive. To look at a population of cheap horses and generalize their faults across the entire TB breed doesn’t make sense to me. (I can only imagine what free warmbloods must look like.)
If you want a TB that’s good looking, correct, unblemished, has a pedigree that suits you, and comes with a full set of xrays and a scope, go to a yearling sale. By the end, there are always inexpensive horses to be found. They’re not yet able to be ridden, but they meet the rest of your criteria. Or buy an older horse for more money from a TB breeder.
To start with a long list of requirements that adds up to a nearly perfect horse, a buyer should be ready to pay a “nearly perfect horse price” rather than expecting to find that horse hanging out at a racetrack for free.
Okay, I lied when I said the other comment was my last. (Sorry)
I was riding and showing hunters in those earlier times–and nothing was the same as it is now. Back then, the goal was to learn to ride. Now it’s to win ribbons. TBs take effort. They’re great horses, but not for beginners, or people who work in an office all week and can only ride on weekends. Everyone wants a shortcut to success now, and that’s not–and has never been–a Thoroughbred.
As for TBs in eventing, they were going strong when the long format prioritized a horse that could really gallop and jump. Now that dressage is uber-important, riders need the big movement they can get from warmbloods.
Both of those changes have a great deal to do with circumstance and people, and little to do with the Thoroughbred breed, which hasn’t changed as much as you may think.