<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by JustMe123:
I think the nebulous “they” that awarded Sale & Pelletier (sp?) the gold really opened a Pandora’s Box. As a hunter rider, you learn pretty fast that sometimes the judges are cheese and sometimes they’re not. Sometimes you win when you don’t deserve it, and sometimes someone else takes home the ribbon you think you earned. THUS IS THE NATURE OF SUBJECTIVE SPORTS! Now everyone who feels like they didn’t get the fair shake - ie, the Russians THIS time - will come back to Sale & Pelletier and expect something. I think that’s unfair.
Geeze, couldn’t they have just thrown out the contested judges’ scores and reconfigured the whole thing? It just seems there HAS to be a better way.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
If they had done what you suggested, thrown out the contested judge, they are left with a tie. If they then put the alternate judge’s score in, the Canadians won, and so the Russians should be left with silver
I think their solution was equitable, and now they just have to hold the line and say “no” to all the foofy protests that are generated in the wake.
I love watching the olympics. I wish they’d show these obscure sports more often. I think it’s a key part of global culture, personally. I am most fascinated by people who compete in sports that are obscure in their own countries, or are otherwise not supported by their federation. (And so I thought it was pretty cool that a Saudi won the show jumping bronze in Sydney!)