I’ve been trying to figure out what this thread reminds me of, and it has finally occurred to me.
I lost my dog to renal disease in May.
I’ve been looking for another dog for months, now.
Given that there are relatively few requirements on my end, one would think that it wouldn’t be that hard.
Yet so many of the dogs I check out on various websites have an incredible list of “must have” and “must not” in the dog’s profile. Some of the requirements appear quite sensible, others are flat out over the top.
And many of the same places that have numerous qualifications on who can adopt a dog also have many whose bios include “Fido has been at our rescue for X months now, and we really want to find Fido a forever family.”
Yes, I get it that matching a dog with the right setting increases the odds of success, but any place that has a list like: must have another dog for company, must have an 8 foot fence, owner must not be absent for more than 2-3 hours at a time, etc. should not be surprised that they have limited the pool of potential adopters.
I guess what I’m trying to say is “do not let the best be the enemy of the good.”