Barisone assessment

[eggbutt]

@Seeker1

I am kirby. The only one and the persistant kirby, praying for you all and wishing you all to be the best version of yourselves.

I’m very sorry “Kirby” or Seeker1 or whatever, I don’t believe you.

[Seeker1]

There were no and never have been threats. Just prayers

[Seeker1]

Why would u? No offense but well…

[trubandloki]

@Seeker1

I am kirby. The only one and the persistant kirby, praying for you all and wishing you all to be the best version of yourselves.

@Seeker1

Baloney

@Seeker1

There were no and never have been threats. Just prayers

@Seeker1

Why would u? No offense but well…

.

[eggbutt]

@Seeker1

There were no and never have been threats. Just prayers

So, reporting someone to the moderators for no reason whatsoever except you don’t like them is okay and not threatening? What did you expect the moderators would do? Spank them? Ban them? What?

[eggbutt]

@Seeker1

Why would u? No offense but well…

Why would I not believe you? I just don’t. Someone with the real Kirby’s background seems to be capable of more reason and ability to understand perception. That’s all…I don’t think you are her…
…
…

[trubandloki]

@eggbutt

@Seeker1

Why would u? No offense but well…

Why would I not believe you? I just don’t. Someone with the real Kirby’s background seems to be capable of more reason and ability to understand perception. That’s all…I don’t think you are her…
…
…

To go with this thought, a mother does not let her daughter in the house to recover after major surgery would not be the same person who would be on a forum insisting the same daughter is honest (even though she admits on the stand that she is not) and how dare we question anything she says.

[MorganSercu]

Sounds like someone watched The Changeling episode first aired 29 September 1967 (Nomad). Syntax is similar.

[Seeker1]

I dont know third base!!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@FitzE

@Sdel

Why are you tagging 2 banned users and 1 member that hasn’t posted anything involving you in quite a while?

Oh, I’m guessing this is someone harassing me? What a shocker.

Even completely ignoring people like this for ages (and not even participating in the last major thread) is not enough to back them off. One more bit of evidence in a pattern of relentless, obsessive, truly disturbing focus that these people have and exert against their targets, even when the target (in this case, me) completely disengages. This is reflective of what we learned about the behaviour of the ‘victims’ at trial. It seems birds of a feather flock together/a family that preys together, stays together.

It sheds light on what MB and the other people at the barn were faced with. People like this cannot give up, walk away, let it go, find another use for their time. They are incapable of controlling the impulse to go after someone once they’ve IDed that person as their target. It’s sick and scary.

And they wonder why they get banned? Oookaaay.

If this is about me, maybe someone can tell that poster to keep my name out their mouth? Although, I guess if they are STILL blathering on about me after all this time, it is a good PSA for others re: the true character of that poster. Plus/minus, I guess. Also, isn’t that kind of sustain obsession what that crew calls ‘living rent-free’ in someone’s head? Oh, how ironic.

There are a couple posters who I’ve deemed beneath contempt and not worthy of notice of any kind whatsoever. Their participation lowers the tone and the content of any discussion.
Blocking them has made these threads much more interesting and efficient for me.

@FitzE

@Sdel brought up the fact that I asked a question on the technical forum as to whether a poster whose post is flagged is notified of as to the identity of who flagged the post. I had assumed not, but you had publically posted that I, specifically, had flagged a post of yours for some innocuous word. I’m pretty sure I did not flag any such post, but your claim that I had flagged it suggested the possibility that posters are in fact notified of the screen name that has flagged a specific post.

In response to Sdel bringing up my post in the technical forum, I explained why I asked the question.

If you had not publicly posted that I supposedly had flagged your post (I’m pretty sure I didn’t), I would not have posted the question on the technical forum.
No one responded to my question, but I’m back to assuming a poster is not notified of the identity of the person who has flagged it.

This was all at least a month ago, but Sdel chose to bring up my post in the technical forum today.

So if you want me to refrain from invoking your screen name, perhaps you could refrain from invoking mine?

[Seeker1]

Hrmm…ok

[jvanrens]

@Seeker1

I am kirby. The only one and the persistant kirby, praying for you all and wishing you all to be the best version of yourselves.

You might do better by wishing to be a better version of yourself. Maybe step away from the computer or tablet or whatever you are using and spend more time taking care of yourself and your daughter. Your persistent behavior isn’t doing yourself any favours.

[eggbutt]

@Seeker1

I dont know third base!!

Now, this I believe.

As far as any of us “being the best version of ourselves”, I can promise you my life has been totally amazing in every single way and I can assure you I’m a pretty darn good version of myself. I can not imagine it being much better, but you keep on thinking any of us need or want your wishes.

You’ve added nothing to any discussion other than posting complete and utter denial of the situation and absolute support for the antagonist. It’s as though you are a character in a play reciting words. If you really are LK’s mother, I would expect more concrete, detailed discussion, similar to the IM poster, who for a while I mistakenly assumed was LK’s father. I know now IM is not JK, just as I fully believe you are not KK.

[Brown_Derby]

A Stepfordian NOMAD.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

A refresher regarding flagging from the moderator (from one of the Tech Support threads) -

So, THIS is the reason I said many deleted/edited by the mod posts are due to ganged up flagging. Don’t try to get me to believe there wasn’t a private message group at one time coordinating posts to flag, attack, or how to respond. To most of us these threads have not been a game to win but speaking truth to a despicable situation.

LOL. Are there enough of us in the minority to constitute a gang?

But you’re wrong. I have never attempted to coordinate the flagging of posts with the tiny number of like minded posters that remain. I flag the posts that I, individually, think violate the forum rules, and coordinate with nobody.

My question on the technical forum was asking whether a poster with a flagged post was notified as to who flagged it. No one answered my question, so I’m back to assuming that the identity of the flagger is not conveyed to the poster, although obviously the mods would have that information.

[MorganSercu]

Same affect.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@FitzE

@Sdel

Why are you tagging 2 banned users and 1 member that hasn’t posted anything involving you in quite a while?

Oh, I’m guessing this is someone harassing me? What a shocker.

Even completely ignoring people like this for ages (and not even participating in the last major thread) is not enough to back them off. One more bit of evidence in a pattern of relentless, obsessive, truly disturbing focus that these people have and exert against their targets, even when the target (in this case, me) completely disengages. This is reflective of what we learned about the behaviour of the ‘victims’ at trial. It seems birds of a feather flock together/a family that preys together, stays together.

It sheds light on what MB and the other people at the barn were faced with. People like this cannot give up, walk away, let it go, find another use for their time. They are incapable of controlling the impulse to go after someone once they’ve IDed that person as their target. It’s sick and scary.

And they wonder why they get banned? Oookaaay.

If this is about me, maybe someone can tell that poster to keep my name out their mouth? Although, I guess if they are STILL blathering on about me after all this time, it is a good PSA for others re: the true character of that poster. Plus/minus, I guess. Also, isn’t that kind of sustain obsession what that crew calls ‘living rent-free’ in someone’s head? Oh, how ironic.

There are a couple posters who I’ve deemed beneath contempt and not worthy of notice of any kind whatsoever. Their participation lowers the tone and the content of any discussion.
Blocking them has made these threads much more interesting and efficient for me.

@FitzE

@Sdel brought up the fact that I asked a question on the technical forum as to whether a poster whose post is flagged is notified of as to the identity of who flagged the post. I had assumed not, but you had publically posted that I, specifically, had flagged a post of yours for some innocuous word. I’m pretty sure I did not flag any such post, but your claim that I had flagged it suggested the possibility that posters are in fact notified of the screen name that has flagged a specific post.

In response to Sdel bringing up my post in the technical forum, I explained why I asked the question.

If you had not publicly posted that I supposedly had flagged your post (I’m pretty sure I didn’t), I would not have posted the question on the technical forum.
No one responded to my question, but I’m back to assuming a poster is not notified of the identity of the person who has flagged it.

This was all at least a month ago, but Sdel chose to bring up my post in the technical forum today.

So if you want me to refrain from invoking your screen name, perhaps you could refrain from invoking mine?

Here’s the thing @CurrentlyHorseless, I believe @FitzE has you on mute and ignore so they would not be reading or responding to your posts. All for naught.

[Fiesta01]

@BigMama1

She was definitely riding regularly this winter. Have no idea if she’s riding now but can’t imagine why she wouldn’t be.

Because after the trial, whomever she was with decided she was an untrustworthy (being polite there) individual and no longer wanted to be associated with her?

[Sdel]

@Fiesta01

@BigMama1

She was definitely riding regularly this winter. Have no idea if she’s riding now but can’t imagine why she wouldn’t be.

Because after the trial, whomever she was with decided she was an untrustworthy (being polite there) individual and no longer wanted to be associated with her?

Not to mention the veiled suggestions in other threads that she was recording at the current barn. And the current barn is connected with Ali Brock. Awkward….

[Seeker1]

You are so clueless eggbutt.