Barisone Criminal Case Update

[Jealoushe]

@eggbutt

Please remind me what other forums/threads I follow you to. I’ll wait. You place way too much significance to yourself.

What is sad is you will still be reading all these threads and continuing to edit where you can trying to remain relevant.

@eggbutt

Again, let me remind you, these threads haven’t been opened because of you. Hate to disappoint you about that.

As far as stalking, you seem to attempt to follow me everywhere and have chosen me and two others as your targets on these threads. Whatever gets you through the day is good. If you are concentrating on me, you are leaving someone else alone.

Don’t let me bother you. Walk on by. You can do it!

The irony of allll your posts. How are you so blindly hypocritical.

[Knights_Mom]

@Jealoushe

@eggbutt

Please remind me what other forums/threads I follow you to. I’ll wait. You place way too much significance to yourself.

What is sad is you will still be reading all these threads and continuing to edit where you can trying to remain relevant.

@eggbutt

Again, let me remind you, these threads haven’t been opened because of you. Hate to disappoint you about that.

As far as stalking, you seem to attempt to follow me everywhere and have chosen me and two others as your targets on these threads. Whatever gets you through the day is good. If you are concentrating on me, you are leaving someone else alone.

Don’t let me bother you. Walk on by. You can do it!

The irony of allll your posts. How are you so blindly hypocritical.

That happens a lot here. And just did again!

[BrendaJane]

just keep swimming

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

Please remind me what other forums/threads I follow you to. I’ll wait. You place way too much significance to yourself.

What is sad is you will still be reading all these threads and continuing to edit where you can trying to remain relevant.

Eggbutt, you had the info on her current Florida living arrangements, which you interjected in this thread (it had nothing to do with this thread) and commented that she was “controlling” and “obsessive.” When asked how you knew that (no one else did), you stated she had posted it in another thread.
I browse pretty widely here, but had not stumbled across that. It certainly suggested to me you were searching her posts.

[trubandloki]

I can say that I don’t follow anyone anywhere on this forum, but I do sometimes notice things people say in other threads.

In other words, having seen what someone posted elsewhere does not mean you followed them there.

For example - I know that LK has posted quite a bit in the SafeSport thread, that does not mean I followed her there. I had been reading it all along. She just made such an impression there that it was impossible to not notice that she was posting there.

[BrendaJane]

impression is a nice way to describe it.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@DownYonder

@Justice_for_Horses

Its really not worth arguing about but my point was that lk posts are the most flagged not jumper lady.

There is an example of such flagged post around post 81. It specifically says "this post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden " then it says
VIew ignored content

FWIW, my post #137 was “flagged by the community” and is still viewable by clicking “View Ignored Content.”

I’m not sure why it was flagged or who complained about it but the funny thing is that it has over 30 likes.

(And apologies if this was addressed further down - I am trying to get caught up!)

Is there uncertainty in your mind as to why it was flagged?
It has been remarked on previously that it’s actually pretty common on this forum for posts which are personal attacks to receive lots and lots of likes. I’ll be interested in seeing if the mods let it stand.

I was NOT the person who flagged it, but it is obvious to me why it was flagged. Same reason as it was liked over 30 times!

[BrendaJane]

@DownYonder

As for the questions about “MB asking to see the gun.”

ah, semantics…around my house I am always asked to ‘let me see’ such and such…and I receive eyerolls when I just wave the requested item around.
Of course law talk would not allow for such a use of term I am sure.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@DownYonder

@Justice_for_Horses

Its really not worth arguing about but my point was that lk posts are the most flagged not jumper lady.

There is an example of such flagged post around post 81. It specifically says "this post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden " then it says
VIew ignored content

FWIW, my post #137 was “flagged by the community” and is still viewable by clicking “View Ignored Content.”

I’m not sure why it was flagged or who complained about it but the funny thing is that it has over 30 likes.

(And apologies if this was addressed further down - I am trying to get caught up!)

I’m thinking it’s pretty easy to guess who.

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@DownYonder

@Justice_for_Horses

Its really not worth arguing about but my point was that lk posts are the most flagged not jumper lady.

There is an example of such flagged post around post 81. It specifically says "this post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden " then it says
VIew ignored content

FWIW, my post #137 was “flagged by the community” and is still viewable by clicking “View Ignored Content.”

I’m not sure why it was flagged or who complained about it but the funny thing is that it has over 30 likes.

(And apologies if this was addressed further down - I am trying to get caught up!)

I’m thinking it’s pretty easy to guess who.

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

Brilliant? Yes I am. Thank you.

Ok maybe not Einstein brilliant but I manage.

[BrendaJane]

LOL, I am thinking the usual suspects got mad that a certain someone’s posts got flagged so they returned the favor.

don’t think nothing of it.
And someone blamed it on the cat.

I’d blame fat fingers,

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

Strange.
I read the post being discussed that either side could like it.
I would bet that some of the likes that post got were from both sides of this discussion.

That is why I am surprised it was flagged.

Both sides could decide it is about others. It is not a personal attack at anyone specific. To be a “personal attack” doesn’t it need to be an attack on a specific person?

[BrendaJane]

there are about 3 or 4 people I would suspect, but this is childish and fruitless, let’s all swim along, shall we?!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cutter99

Eh, I would let it stand the way it is. Let whoever got their knickers in a knot continue to stew over it. Obviously there were plenty of us who agreed wholeheartedly with you!

Eh, I would let it stand. Whoever was attacked (and you didn’t even mention anyone’s name!) has been attacked a thousand times before on this forum, so what difference does one more pointless attack make?

Obviously, there are plenty of us who enjoy this sort of thing! This is just exactly what gives CoTH its jolly, entertaining character!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

Strange.
I read the post being discussed that either side could like it.
I would bet that some of the likes that post got were from both sides of this discussion.

That is why I am surprised it was flagged.

Both sides could decide it is about others. It is not a personal attack at anyone specific. To be a “personal attack” doesn’t it need to be an attack on a specific person?

Oh, please. It was an attack on someone specific. This game of “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid.

Do the mods really let attack posts stand if one simply refers to “someone”, when it’s obvious who “someone” is?

ETA. Please note that I said that the game of saying “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid, I did not call any poster stupid.

Edited again. I reread the post, and it refers to “a certain someone”, complete with the quotes. Are you really claiming that the poster was not referring to a particular “certain” someone? Unbelievable.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

Strange.
I read the post being discussed that either side could like it.
I would bet that some of the likes that post got were from both sides of this discussion.

That is why I am surprised it was flagged.

Both sides could decide it is about others. It is not a personal attack at anyone specific. To be a “personal attack” doesn’t it need to be an attack on a specific person?

Oh, please. It was an attack on someone specific. This game of “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid.

Do the mods really let attack posts stand if one simply refers to “someone”, when it’s obvious who “someone” is?

ETA. Please note that I said that the game of saying “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid, I did not call any poster stupid.

You really like to complain about the moderation here. Geez.

I can tell you that when I first read it, I had no idea who it was talking about. That might be because (refer to my other post here) I suck at remembering names and I am too lazy to go track back and see what side of the debate that poster typically posts on.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

So ya think the subject of the personal attack may be the person who flagged it? Brilliant!

Strange.
I read the post being discussed that either side could like it.
I would bet that some of the likes that post got were from both sides of this discussion.

That is why I am surprised it was flagged.

Both sides could decide it is about others. It is not a personal attack at anyone specific. To be a “personal attack” doesn’t it need to be an attack on a specific person?

Oh, please. It was an attack on someone specific. This game of “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid.

Do the mods really let attack posts stand if one simply refers to “someone”, when it’s obvious who “someone” is?

ETA. Please note that I said that the game of saying “maybe I wasn’t talking about you” is stupid, I did not call any poster stupid.

You really like to complain about the moderation here. Geez.

I can tell you that when I first read it, I had no idea who it was talking about. That might be because (refer to my other post here) I suck at remembering names and I am too lazy to go track back and see what side of the debate that poster typically posts on.

I have complained about the moderation absolutely never. Upthread, I respectfully stated I would appreciate clarification on the rule on anonymously accusing someone of a crime, and appreciated the mods’ clarification when it was offered. Other posters also appreciated the clarification.

Likewise, I thought that post violated the rule against personal attacks, and I am genuinely interested in knowing if there is a loophole in the sense that making the attack about “someone” as opposed to “screen name” makes it acceptable, as some posters have suggested.

For the record, I have
flagged zero posts
Tagged to moderators never
PMed the moderators never
criticized the moderation never

If it turns out that an otherwise objectionable post is rendered acceptable by simply omitting the name of any poster, I’ll make a mental note of that without “complaining about the moderation”.

What would be the point of “complaining about the moderation”? The mods are the mods. For anyone who doesn’t approve of the way they’re doing their job, the first and last option is to leave. Duh.

trying to figure out the forum rules =/= complaining about the moderation

[BrendaJane]

is this a compulsion to proceed on this tangent?

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

Eh, I would let it stand the way it is. Let whoever got their knickers in a knot continue to stew over it. Obviously there were plenty of us who agreed wholeheartedly with you!

Eh, I would let it stand. Whoever was attacked (and you didn’t even mention anyone’s name!) has been attacked a thousand times before on this forum, so what difference does one more pointless attack make?

Obviously, there are plenty of us who enjoy this sort of thing! This is just exactly what gives CoTH its jolly, entertaining character!

This is a board that consists of people posting their opinions. If someone is hurt or upset over what is posted, that is their issue and no one else’s. Not everyone agrees, nor should they. We are all different.

If you perceive you are being attacked a thousand times 1) why come back, 2) you might want to consider why you are think you are being attacked, 3) you might want to try looking at things from a different perspective.

No one is forcing anyone to read what is here or forcing anyone to post.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cutter99

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

Eh, I would let it stand the way it is. Let whoever got their knickers in a knot continue to stew over it. Obviously there were plenty of us who agreed wholeheartedly with you!

Eh, I would let it stand. Whoever was attacked (and you didn’t even mention anyone’s name!) has been attacked a thousand times before on this forum, so what difference does one more pointless attack make?

Obviously, there are plenty of us who enjoy this sort of thing! This is just exactly what gives CoTH its jolly, entertaining character!

This is a board that consists of people posting their opinions. If someone is hurt or upset over what is posted, that is their issue and no one else’s. Not everyone agrees, nor should they. We are all different.

If you perceive you are being attacked a thousand times 1) why come back, 2) you might want to consider why you are think you are being attacked, 3) you might want to try looking at things from a different perspective.

No one is forcing anyone to read what is here or forcing anyone to post.

I do not perceive I am being attacked “a thousand times”, but I have some empathy for the person who is, as do at least a handful of other posters.

I would enjoy the forum much more if these attacks did not occur. They seem pointless to me. If it gets bad enough, I have always been aware that I can leave.