Personally… a hung jury makes me believe in the jury system, and some citizens who serve on juries taking their duty VERY seriously, such that they will not succumb to pressure.
I actually think a hung jury in this case makes sense. So much mess was thrown at the jurors. Worst of all? Two witnesses who were… problematic.
Luckily for the barn mates, it’s the end of the show season there, so there should be plenty of empty stalls in the surrounding area if they decide they all need to vacate the premises.
Unfortunate for them if they are put in the position where they feel the need to do that. But better than some of the other possibilities.
When I was ten, the chain broke on my bike while I was noodling along on my street, a few hundred yards from my house. A neighbor found me sitting dazed on the curb, with a gash on my chin and the chain wrapped around my shin. He brought me home. My parents bathed me, I was seen by a doctor who lived on the street, I had something to eat, we had conversations, I was put to rest on the couch, and yet I did not “wake up” until 8pm that night. This part I remember distinctly - a show was on PBS about an aircraft called the Gossamer Albatross and I asked my mother a million times “what happened, what happened.” I remember she grew frustrated that I could not hold her answers in my mind. Per the neighborhood doctor’s recommendations, they woke me every hour that night.
I am now 54 years old. I have zero memory of that day until coming to at 8pm. I still do not remember waking up, or having breakfast, not the accident, not bathing or the doctor - nada, zip, zilch, until the Gossamer Albatross.
I can believe the claim of amnesia. I don’t know that’s what happened to him, but I can confirm that it does, indeed, happen.
I will. Because that is how the judicial system is meant to work.
It is how I serve as a juror.
I suppose from your comment that, if you were a juror, you would follow your personal feelings and not carry out the law.
I have to say that sounds quite different from what the judge said in his instructions to the jury. He definitely mentioned intent to commit a criminal act or unlawful purpose or something along those lines.
Honestly, I apologize. I had no idea that these snowflakes had a different, special meaning to all of you that is different than the normal meaning that everyone outside of COTH understands. My apologies, I won’t make fun of any of you for posting snowflakes again.
I’m really starting to wonder if it will end up as a hung jury.
After seeing the extremely entrenched opinions displayed on this thread where there is nobody with skin in the game, I wonder if those 12 people will be able to agree on anything in this case.
There are people that can discuss the topic at hand (the case) and those that rather insult, bicker, and get personal/make it about posters and their activities. I’d ignore the latter, because they aren’t worth your time.
I agree, it very well may hang. I think the only thing the jury may unanimously agree on is that horse people are crazy and should be given wide berth.
Probably happy, since everyone can claim that the whole jury agreed with their own opinion except for that one stupid random juror who was the hold out. Lol.
But they’re really not entrenched opinions that are based in an understanding of the facts of the case, the evidence, what was and wasn’t allowed.
Its just opinions based on… a part of the story.
They’re quite committed to that ill informed opinion, but not enough to actually learn anything about it.
That suggests that its merely entertainment to come here and bluster about what they clearly don’t know about. Or care to learn about.
Entertainment.
Yikes.