Thought this was very interesting and others might like to read it when seeking cost effective hay feeding options. It compares the safety and cost payback/hay wastage of different types of hay feeders. I use a hay net, better/heavier grade break strength and smaller holes than the one tested, with a hay hut and find my round bales stay clean, dry and horses are safe which is my highest priority, cost/quality being second!. Plus my bales last at least 20% + longer.
The article compared these hay feeders:
A. Cinch Net ($147*; Cinch Chix LLC, North Branch, MN)
B. Cone ($1,195*; Weldy Enterprises, Wakarusa, IN; model R7C)
C. Covered Cradle ($3,200*; SM Iron Inc., Sanborn, MN)
D. Hayhut ($650*; Hayhuts LLS, Deleon Spring, FL)
E. Hay Sleigh ($425*; Smith Iron Works Inc., St. Francis, MN)
F. Ring ($300*; R & C Livestock, Bethany, MO)
G. Tombstone ($250*; Dura-Built, Eagan, MN)
H. Tombstone Saver ($650*; HiQual, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada)
I. Waste Less ($1,450*; JSI Innovations LLC, St. Croix Falls, WI)
J. No-feeder control
- Prices quoted at time of research (July 2010), delivery not included, and prices are subject to change.
Here is the link.
http://www.extension.umn.edu/agriculture/horse/nutrition/selecting-a-round-bale-feeder/