Horse in question is at another barn and I haven’t seen his feet. A friend who is involved with the horse but not the owner was asking my advice.
Apparently horse has chronic untreated thrush and ratty frogs. Owner was cleaning feet, pulled off a loose shred, and got blood. Owner poulticed for abscess for a couple of days, put horse back into work, and he came up three legged lame.
Owner is treating as abscess, my friend thinks it’s thrush. I’ve never heard of a horse bleeding from the frog except when our local self taught barefoot trimmer tried to excise all the “thrush” from a barn acquaintances horse (horse probably didn’t have thrush but I digress). My first question was whether the horse had a sunken coffin bone that was putting all the sensitive tissues too close to the ground. But my friend thought he had no signs of laminitis or founder past or present.
I’ve treated several abscesses, and it’s clear they don’t bleed. But I’ve never had actual thrush in a horse under my care. And IMHO a lot of conscientious horse owners get all upset about what I call “imaginary thrush” meaning any weather related change to the sole of the foot :).
So this situation is unusual. Could thrush indeed eat away so much frog, that the sensitive tissues are exposed?
If so I’d want to address the chronic thrush with a topical, preferably one that doesn’t sting, and clean up the environmental contributing factors, and get the horse on a ration balancer or vitamin mineral supplement for hoof growth.
Anyhow I am not involved in care, so this is more theoretical as I don’t come across many cases of real thrush, even second hand. And it’s the real cases that help me be confident in diagnosing “imaginary thrush” as a phenomena.