Watching the Olympics has really made me stop and think a bit more about this question, especially in it’s relation to breeding dressage horses (obviously we know jumpers are specialists and need to be bred that way). Many of the dressage horses were strongly influenced by jumper lines especially through the dam’s side.
Obviously the horses we are seeing in London now are the result of breeding policies ten- fifteen years ago…so what was KWPN doing then that led to this success? Just glancing at the KWPN horses on the dressage ranking list of the WFSHB all of the KWPN horses on the first few pages have jumper blood up close. ie Parcival : Jazz on an Ulft mare, Painted Black is Gribaldi on a Ferro (who could jump! by Ulft) , Valegro is by the Ferro son Negro and out of a Gershwin (Voltaire/Nimmerdor) mare, Tango is Jazz/Contango , Breaking Dawn is Akribori who is Accord/Laval from a Ronald (Ramiro) dam, Totilas is Gribaldi on a Glendale dam , Uzzo is Lancet on an Indoctro dam. The list goes on…
Interestingly, if I look at the top Hanoverian horses on the first few pages only three have any jumper blood up close, two are by Espri from very dressage bred dams. One is from a Ritual mother. This studbook held the number one position much longer than any other and for many years in a row but that has now changed. I do know now that they very much encourage the infusion of jumper blood on our dressage oriented mares (the “right” jumper blood of course) though this obviously wasn’t the trend a decade or so ago…
But maybe the jumper blood has nothing to do with the standings or successes of either studbook?? I guess I am just thinking and rambling out loud here and am interested in learning more about what other breeders here think!?
Do we need a regular infusion of jumper genes to keep the athleticism and quality in the canter (among other things)or are we heading in a better direction by specializing (effectively diluting jumping blood and ability with every generation)?