British eventer Caroline March passes voluntarily

Seems you woke up on the wrong side of bed.

  1. I did say for those that could access it. Several people have. You do have the option of saying ‘hey, that doesn’t work for me, could you copy the article’.
  2. I said it added a different perspective. I didn’t say which was right or wrong because I don’t believe one is right and one is wrong. Yes, I follow Melanie’s writing and she has obviously chosen a completely different path to Caroline. I’m not judging either of them for the choices they have made. I was simply observing that within the community of disabled horse people, there are different perspectives.

I hope your day gets better.

11 Likes

It’s been brought to my attention that unlike other newspapers The Times maybe doesn’t give a couple of free articles pre the paywall popup. So here is the article I linked to above. Apologies to those who evidently found it very frustrating not to be able to read it:

Those who judge Caroline March have no right. She lost too much

The talented horse rider died by assisted suicide, two years after being paralysed. I empathised with every word she wrote about her decision

Melanie Reid - The Times

I had followed Caroline March on Facebook since her accident, one of thousands silently willing the former professional event rider on after her life-changing fall two years ago. There were low moments, when her yearning for what she had lost was evident, but this lovely, young, go-getting woman seemed to be rising out of the ashes and rebuilding.

In the first year she went through stages that I recognised well: denial of the reality of paralysis, then a stubborn quest to defeat it, and finally — I’m not going to use the word acceptance, nor the hateful, trite “coming to terms with” — she seemed to have reached a place where she could whizz around in a fabulous wheelchair and forge a career as a photographer.

When I chanced across her final message online on Monday, a few hours after it was posted, it devastated me. Her words were searing, beautifully written, brutal and utterly honest. Liberated by the decision she had made to end her life, she said it as bluntly as anyone who is paralysed has ever publicly done: hers was an unbearable existence. She had lost too much. I understood and empathised with every single word. Fourteen years ago, playing around at the grass roots of the same sport, I fell off my horse and broke my neck. I spent a year in hospital and live in a wheelchair as a tetraplegic.

It’s vital to understand, I think, where Caroline came from. People who keep horses, especially professionals, lead a driven, immersive life, one of permanent labour. They are physically tough, resourceful and can-do. They work ridiculously long, hard days, often wet and dirty, always on the go, slaves to their pampered animals. For many it is a kind of addiction: to the smell of horses, the feel of their coats, the thrill of riding, training, winning.

For me, Caroline’s key paragraph was where she expressed this. It made me break down because I identified with it. It bears repeating in full: “I’ve always believed that you can’t change … what makes you tick as an individual. I’m feral, a complete rogue, someone that thrives on spontaneity. I’m feminine, masculine, strong, sexy, intelligent, loving, loyal, needy, with a heart of gold all in one. Quite simply put, everything that defined me is physically not possible to do in a way that I enjoy. I hate asking for help, not because I can’t, but because I love doing things for myself and it destroys me watching people do my jobs. I’m possibly the most independent, strong-minded, stubborn c*** going. I’m manual labour, I produce horses, I drive wagons and help on the farm. I’m a dirty bitch and a complete whore for sexy underwear. I’m crisp cold mornings taking my dogs for a walk, I kill things for fun, stupid miles on my bike. My idea of a holiday is off-grid huts exploring inaccessible landscape. I don’t just like the countryside, I need it. I need risk, that dopamine hit and the threat of danger … adrenaline hits are my addiction.”

And therein lies her eulogy and our lament, those of us who carry on after injury. No one healthy can understand what paralysis takes away from you. They can try, but if you break your spine you pass through a door that few others enter. And it ain’t into the rose garden. Hers was a dreadful multiple bereavement — career, freedom, her dream of a band of happy children free-ranging the farm. She says she would have been a great mother, but on her terms, not those decreed by paralysis. So she was angry.

Those who rush to judge this 31-year-old when they have no right to — and sadly there are many of them, devoid of empathy or motivated by their position on the politics of assisted dying — should respect Caroline’s choice and stay silent. Only she knew. After I broke my neck I learnt very quickly that only those who inhabit the body know what it means to endure that body.

The choice of whether to go on or to give up is a basic human right. I find her decision heartbreaking — it lies like lead on me as I write this — but I admire and respect her. She has let no one down. There are very few of us with spinal cord injuries who have not toyed with the same solution. Those who choose to go on do so for the sake of others, or because we find an alternative purpose. That’s not to say we do not continue to suffer, physically and mentally. Disability is rubbish, no matter the modern gloss put on it. Believe me, the knowledge that there’s a way out, even if it means leaving the country to exercise it, makes life more bearable.

There will be some in the spinal community who wish Caroline had waited, because two years is nothing in the spinal scheme of things, and her life might have improved. But that’s only their perspective. Frankly it’s not anyone’s business. She had no interest in being called an inspiration for keeping going, an accolade the rest of us must queasily accept, again and again.

Caroline sounded a unique, fiery, free spirit. Highly intelligent, rational, mentally aware, she had before her accident shaken off the depression she’d suffered. She simply didn’t want to live a life based on sacrifices and suffering, faced with “the entire impossibility to do anything and everything I love”. Such is her right.

“Please respect my decision, this is my life and my choice. I am an incredible person,” she wrote. And so she was. I am glad she has found peace, and I wish the same for her family.

27 Likes

I don’t know where the quote option disappeared to for me, but for paywall articles, this site works quite well: https://archive.ph

You just copy and past the link to the article you want in the red box and boom. No more paywall.

3 Likes

My day is fine. I’m not sure why you would post knowing an article is behind a paywall. You could have copied it from the start. Differing perspectives are important, for reasons stated in an earlier post.

When we are talking basic rights of self determination, those should be for all humans.
If some are not, under discussion here some/many people with all kinds of needs, it is still all of them that should have their rights upheld, as long as we don’t take others away, is what all have been able to fight for in free societies.

To insist some using their individual rights that truly don’t harm any other human are to blame for others losing theirs?
It doesn’t work like that.
The right to vote doesn’t keep others from voting, a choice to end an unwanted pregnancy doesn’t mandate others make same choice, assisted suicide doesn’t keep others from living.

We know there are no actions without consequences that spread from them like a stone hitting the surface of quiet water, that is true.

Individual rights depend on understanding and respecting the differences of which right comes first, here it was her right to choose.

31 Likes

Because, in my experience, most news channels allow free access to a couple of articles before the pop up. Clearly I am a subscriber, so don’t get the non-subscriber view. Could I have tested it for you? Yes. Did I have to? No. As people above you liked the post and referred to info about Melanie, I assumed if they could access it, then most could. Since you said you couldn’t see it, I’ve made it so everyone can. Why is this so offensive to you? (In fact. Don’t answer. I’m done with this topic and would rather stick to the actual subject than pacifying someone who feels I’ve somehow committed some terrible crime).

18 Likes

Melanie’s article is awesome, thanks for sharing. What she writes about who Caroline was is exactly why I told darkMoonlady to go read Caroline’s FB. Melanie also pointed out a farm girl like Caroline’s lifestyle and how it affected her decision.

12 Likes

Exactly my thoughts.

Others, outsiders, should have zero say in how one elects to run their own lives. Abortion, birth control, vasectomy, hysterectomy, IVF… all of that is super private and 100% self. Self self self.

I look at my little mom, the woman who loved pulling weeds and mowing the grass and following that with a hot shower and a glass of iced tea… trapped in a wheelchair with a diaper on while stuck in the house with my dad and that GD television and 25 hour news. It’s a terrible life. She’s on a zillion medicines for a disease state that will only get worse. If you asked her to consider what she’d like to do…I feel pretty sure she’d say put me out in the sunshine by the water’s edge and let me go to sleep and never wake up.

And it would be no one else’s business to say she was wrong.

58 Likes

Agreed, You either support bodily autonomy or you don’t.

29 Likes

My mom has pretty much said the same to me, knowing that Alzheimers and dementia run in her family (in the women in particular) and having lived through my grandmother’s continued survival for five years after a nurse chose to ignore her DNR order.

I say continued survival because she wasn’t alive. Her body may have been, but she wasn’t. She had been gone for years before the DNR situation happened, and it was torturous for everyone involved before that, but even more so after. My mother wants to go while she’s still here and able to make that decision, not put herself and all of us through what will probably happen if she doesn’t.

I choose to believe that we’ll be in a different place with Alzheimers and dementia treatment by the time it’s likely to impact me, since I should have at least a few decades until then, but if we aren’t… I can’t say I wouldn’t want the same thing as my mom.

14 Likes

Whoa. Your article was behind a paywall I couldn’t see it either. Not every website offers free articles.
There is no need for your level of reaction and insults to someone who points that out.

4 Likes

What would we be talking about if Caroline had chosen not to leave a letter?

I believe, down deep in my bones, everyone has a right to make decisions about his/her life. It is why I advocate for and donate to Planned Parenthood, in spite of never needing their services. It is why I was saddened by Caroline’s letter, but recognized it was her choice to end her life. It is why I felt there was a special place in this world for Jack Kevorkian.

BUT, I feel a sadness over her choice. That sadness comes from living through my mother’s suicide attempt when I was 14. It comes from living through the suicides of a much loved cousin and an aunt. It comes from learning to carry on and live life after someone you love has made a different choice.

I would fight for Caroline’s right to make the choice she did. But I don’t admire her, she is not an inspiration. She is just a human who made the best possible choice for herself given the circumstances.

Voice your opinions but don’t attack each other. Everyone is analyzing this based on their own life experiences. If I had a teenaged son or daughter, who read Caroline’s letter and found her choice inspirational, I would be afraid.

46 Likes

Excellent post. @horselover65 .

2 Likes

I have unfortunately had similar life experiences to you (and I regret that that is true for both of us), and I agree with everything you said. Except:

I admire her. I don’t admire her cause of death (I don’t judge it either), but I admire her courage to prioritize her own needs, even in the face of what were surely conflicting (though loving) wants of others. I admire her willingness to share her experience with the world so that we could have this conversation, despite knowing it would surely be met with mixed feelings. I am inspired by how unapologetically herself she was, aware of both the good parts and the bad. Most of that was true of her in life as well as in death - she did not become admirable or inspirational on March 23rd, nor on April 14, 2022 for that matter.

I have no wish to die, I don’t think it is admirable (nor condemnable) to die by suicide, and I am not inspired by a death in that way. But I do admire Caroline, and I do think she is inspiring. Though she said herself she didn’t want to be an inspiration and never has, so I admit I feel a bit wrong in saying that.

29 Likes

Thank you for the link and for sharing The Times article, Doodlebug. It was very moving and insightful.

10 Likes

I agree with your post, Djones, and your description of your mom has touched my heart.
I would certainly not say she was wrong, and I hope for the best for her, and you.

7 Likes

You never know with people, my always active almost 96 year old mother in home hospice
and in a bed was bicycling with her legs to stay awake and stay alive to the end. In her 90s she had a pace maker and stent and hip replacement and she was glad to be alive and did not want to leave this world. When her body started to fail after pneumonia and she could not stand, she was moved to hospice home care. We watched TV 12/7 (she did sleep) but we had it on the racing channel or watched All Creatures re-runs or the handsome man on the BBC news hour. She was not in pain (that was a blessing) and not going to leave this world until her body finally could no go on. As a primary caretaker it was hard (and I think I have PTSD from it), as there was no denying death or saving her, despite her will. But she too left this world on her own terms. Even if she was old and bedridden and needed to be changed, she wanted to live on until she could not. A person’s quality of life and what they value of life, is such an individual thing.

29 Likes

Amen.

18 Likes

I think I get what DarkMoonLady is saying. That people are ok with Medically Assisted Death in this case, because we imagine life as a paraplegic could be intolerable. She would rather we thought of ways to make it less intolerable, more inclusive and likely more visible. It is hard for me to think that mental health didn’t play some part in her inability to reimagine herself with this injury, or to even see hope of being able to reimagine herself as some point, and that maybe that points more to a lack of supports.

I am pro MAiD. I think (in Canada) it is currently too restrictive as I think some mental health issues should be considered terminal illnesses, but I also see DML point.

I don’t judge anybody who ends their own life, but I do think it should be seen as a call to action to see how we can provide better support systems, adaptations and accommodations, particularly for people who aren’t terminally ill or chronically in pain.

19 Likes

My grandmother was the opposite. When it felt like she was going to be too much of a burden (her view, not ours!) and she moved out of her senior residence to hospice, she chose to simply stop taking nourishment.

She was Catholic, and I always wondered how she rationalized it with her religion, but we all just loved and supported her through her choice. I think part of it was that her youngest son had passed 8 months before in a tragic accident at 50, and she was losing her memory before that as well.

I honestly haven’t thought of it in years, so I appreciate your story reminding me of my wonderful mamare who always did things stubbornly her own way.

8 Likes