[QUOTE=SleepyFox;4666452]
Who’s the owner?? And, more importantly, who do you publicly crucify for this one? If Delahoussaye is running the shed is it his fault? Or, is it Burdewicz since it’s his license? Or, is the owner really calling the shots? Maybe it would be best to just go for the trifecta and go after them all?[/QUOTE]
The ills of racing have been kept quiet for way too long and I am sorry that someone like you who is involved in the game seems to disagree. If you have a problem with what is reported - and you seem to conveniently disregard my positive posts about Penn’s recent actions - then maybe you should save yourself the angst of reading what’s posted. If you were here and saw what many have seen you would likely agree. After all, you were the one who was valiantly defending Cole Norman for being a great horseman.
I’ve reread our exchanges on this board and I can smile when reading old posts because I’ve reported facts that have been backed up by resulting actions. In about 3 weeks, you’ll take back ever calling Cole Norman a good horseman.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, I just want Penn National to become a great racing product and I strongly believe this can be attained by implementing some change that would be easy quite frankly. I’m encouraged by the change I’ve seen this week.
And if you want my opinion of Delahoussaye, I’ll give it. I believe that given his history he has no right to be in charge of horses, whether he is training them, a foreman, a hot walker or a stall mucker. There comes a point where you make mistakes and everyone deserves a 2nd and maybe a 3rd chance, but given his record of run ins with various racing jurisdictions and his apparent blatant disregard for rules or the well being of the horses, he should be called to the carpet when he’s associated with horses breaking down.
Would you send a horse you owned to be trained by him?
Delahoussaye v. Ohio State Racing Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
UNPUBLISHED, 2004 WL 1445951
June 29, 2004
Summary of Opinion
Plaintiff Delahoussaye is a licensed race horse owner and trainer, whose license was suspended for possession and use of an electrical speed enhancement device on a horse. In this opinion, the Court of Appeals upholds the suspension. A veterinarian witnessed administration of an electrical shock during training and the plaintiff was found with the instrument in his possession.
Text of Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, appellant, Darrel Delahoussaye, appeals from two judgments of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirming an order of the appellee, The Ohio State Racing Commission (“commission”), that sanctioned appellant for his possession and use of an electric instrument on the grounds of a race track. For the following reasons, we affirm those judgments.
http://asci.uvm.edu/equine/law/cases/racing/delahoussaye.htm
I guess the VETERINARIANS who witnessed the shock treatment of the horse at Beulah were just out to get Delahoussaye?