I’ve wondered, too, why, at this juncture of time with Gill horses breaking down on a regular and predictable basis, jocks don’t boycott. I was just speaking about this very thing with my DD who had a horse in the same race the other night. In fact, her horse was right next to the one who snapped its leg.
It’s no longer a matter of IF something catastrophic is going to happen (although it is certainly catastrophic for the horse each and every time), but WHEN. Furthermore, I think that, if management has not already been sufficiently mortified by the sheer number of breakdowns out of that barn, it’s encumbent on the horsemen to demand that changes are made, and soon.
Mr. Gill’s decided lack of concern (and, boy is that putting it mildly) does not affect just one horse and/or one rider: his nerved/blocked horses jeopardize EVERY horse and EVERY rider in the race. What jock would want to place their horse anywhere near Gill’s horse? It may even affect the way a race is run and it’s eventual outcome. Doesn’t seem implausible to me.