Can someone tell me about the Oldenburg NA?

[QUOTE=graystonefarm;2764991]
With all of the legalities aside, what it comes down to is honor and integrity. Many breeders (mare owners and stallion owners alike) still refuse to do business with the Old NA/ISR because they “stole” the Oldenburg brand.

Lets put it this way. Let’s say that the American QH had a brand and you bred American QHs. Imagine that your brick driveway displayed that symbol and that symbol was on the side of your home and displayed on the outside and inside walls of your stable and on your horses’ stalls. How would you feel if the Germans “stole” the American Quarterhorse name and brand claimed it as their own? You will only feel their true “pain” and frustration if go to Gemany and meet them in person and see that it is a part of their heritage.

The only reason the ISR won the lawsuit is because they patented the name and brand here first. Don’t let Cartier cloud the issues. Some say it’s just business, however, for those that KNOW the true facts, what is all boils down to is ethics and how far are you willing go for the all mighty dollar.[/QUOTE]

Your comparison falls well short of credibility for many reasons. The American Quarter Horse is a breed and not subject to the approval of inspectors. But using your flawed analogy, the AQHA did not go to Germany, sign a licensing agreement with Germans to breed America Quarter Horses in Germany… allow them to do so for a decade, involving 3-5 generations and then try to evade abiding by the agreement they signed and the consequences of the decisions made in their name.

You can’t take a brand off of a horse. American breeders who paid for the right to the O and Crown brand on their Oldenburg horses have as much right to that brand as any German breeder because the GOV gave us that right. The GOV came here to the USA and encouraged us to breed O and Crown branded Oldenburg horses, investing lots of money in these bloodlines, stallions, mares foals, breeding programs. i.e., in these businesses, so we could essentially produce more income for the GOV. American breeders paid for the right to use the O and Crown brand. I have no sympathy what-so-ever for the GOV not making as much off of American Breeders as they originally intended. The GOV has put very very little into breeding in this country. The GOV seems to simply want to take from us. By all accounts, the GOV operates in the USA out of someone’s Condo bedroom in Florida and has a “staff” of one, who is almost impossible to get a hold of. Not saying that a bedroom operation is a bad thing, but the GOV can do better. American breeders deserve better.

Before I go to Germany and see all their pain and tears, I can simply look around here is the USA and see what all these shenanigans have done to our market place. The tears I cry are for American Oldenburg breeders who have had to put up with this baloney for the past ten years.

Graystone’s example doesn’t fly because no one stole anything. The GOV came here to this country of their own free will and said “You American Oldenburg breeders can breed Oldenburg horses here in the USA under our guidance and we will allow you to use the O and Crown brand. And, of course, we will charge you for this.” American breeders acted honorably, the Old NA acted honorably… it was the GOV that did not. And nothing Old NA has done in the USA has anything what-so-ever to do with whether some German breeder has the O and Crown emblazoned on her driveway, her forehead or anywhere else she might like to stick it.


[QUOTE=YankeeLawyer;2764997]
This is not legal advice but IME non-compete clauses that purport to operate indefinitely tend to be disfavored by judges. In other words, a one year or two year non-compete clause is one thing, but a “forever” non-compete clause is far less likely to be enforceable. Also, I believe that in some states, non-compete clauses are void and thus not enforceable at all (I think that is so in California, for example, but someone would have to verify that). So, this gentleman should look into his options.[/QUOTE]

It’s not a non-compete clause that is the problem. Actually, there is some discrepancy as to whether there actually was a non-compete clause at all - one side says yes, the other side says no.

However, the more onerous problem is the fact that ISR owns the mark in the U.S. and has threatened to take protectionist action.

One has to wonder why an organization with such a long list of accomplishments and benefits feels it can’t survive without the Oldenburg name and brand, and especially why it feels it can’t survive if its former breeding director is allowed to work in North America for a different registry. Talk about insecurity! :lol:

“why it feels it can’t survive if its former breeding director is allowed to work in North America for a different registry.”

That is not a very bright comment in light of the fact that their former director is the one who messed things up so horrobly that both parties can not overcome their differences still. It also seems obvious that the management of the ISR/OLNA is thinking ahead and applying protective measures to help them stay in business. Karsten using the goodwill he created while touring for years with the ISR, now for GOV would be in direct competition. As for owning the trademark that the ISR developed in the US for 15 years prior to this being a problem, it also has helped them continue their business as they have in the past years. Whether you like it or not it was done completely legal according to everyday business in the US.

Karsten is a great guy as are many people involved with either registry Holly, Evelyn etc.Evelyn and Karsten went to school together and have known each other for a long time. Some people within the registies know the facts and can actually discuss them in a normal matter however if posted here it only causes arguments. What is the point. Working together would be great but for now it seems that both are functioning well the way they choose to and breeders have a choice.

I believe my point has just been proven so I think the following is worth repeating. :smiley:

Some say it’s just business, however, for those that KNOW the true facts, what is all boils down to is ethics and how far are you willing go for the all mighty dollar.

Why should you care who you hurt? Because it’s all about you, right? :wink: Screw everyone else because it’s the “American” way? :no:

Wanna know who wins the lawsuits the majority of the time? The one with the most money and the best lawyers!

[QUOTE=Edgar;2765384]
“why it feels it can’t survive if its former breeding director is allowed to work in North America for a different registry.”

That is not a very bright comment in light of the fact that their former director is the one who messed things up so horrobly that both parties can not overcome their differences still. [/QUOTE]

Uh, the former breeding director I was referring to IS Karsten Kuehl, not the guy who caused many of the previous problems. And, as you just stated, I think everyone is agreed that Karsten is a great guy.

As far as ISR developing the trademark for 15 years - don’t you think that the international reputation of the Oldenburg Verband had something to do with that? If Oldenburg wasn’t such a well-known and successful breeding organization, would ISR have become as large as it is? I think most folks realize that ISR’s capitalizing on the Oldenburg name and brand is what enabled it to grow so much.

Both registries are functioning very well, however, there will always be confusion in connection with the two different Oldenburg registries here in NA so there will always be questions and discussions on this topic. The point here in discussing it is that people gain knowledge. :wink:

I don’t think the reputation of the Oldenburg Verband had that much to do with the success of ISR. It was launched early on in the evolution of sporthorse breeding in the US. It could have been Meckelburgs, or any other breeding region, we didn’t know. That time was before the internet, web sites, and forums.

I bred to First Class twice in the early '90s. When he died, I said to one of my breeding buddies, “I didn’t know he was a Bunde champion.” She said neither did I, but in those days it wouldn’t have meant much.

I bred my first wb in 1988 and have been active ever seen – and across a number of registeries. I am not registry -centric. I am passionate about horses, but not about registeries.

I think the squabbling, and it appears to be squabbling to those of us who are not suited up for battle, hurts the American sporthorse breeders. It is a distraction at a time when we need to be marketing Born in America stock to up and coming riders.

I’d like to see a handful people of people with common sense, like Edgar and some others with broader perspective than just one registry, get together and work out a sensible win-win plan and all the adults have to agree to live with it.

That’s just my opinion and I could be wrong.

Sally, it will likely never happen. They’ve tried and could not come to an agreement. Someone correct me if I’m wrong but I don’t believe any American board members or officers have the ability to negotiate a resolution of any kind. It’s only EB who has that authority.

Both sides were in negotiations not too long ago and the Verband was willing to buy back the brand but wanted control over the mare books because they did not want to make the same mistake twice. They wanted to make sure that the rules for the NA mare books would be the same as what they have in Germany. EB was not willing to give up the books or his positition and control over the registry so they were not able to reach an agreement.

I too wish they would come to a resolution but I can’t see it ever happening. :no:

“Uh, the former breeding director I was referring to IS Karsten Kuehl, not the guy who caused many of the previous problems.”

yes I know that is what you meant. I am saying that the agreement (non compete) with Karsten, the new director at the time, was made a long time ago after that debacle with their prior director, so it would not happen again. That was a logical business decision on the part of ISR/Ekkehart. It prevented it from happening this time and although the situation is slightly different and Karsten seems more ethical, it has nothing to do with who was the director but everything to do with how they got to this “so far” (being positive here) unreconsilable difference which is not good for anybody.

I think often in discussing these issues fingers are pointed to the management as being evil or making poor decisions. If you look a bit further however you find that these decisions were often made with the memberships best interest in mind. Confusion exists with 2 registries registering horses of a similar breed. Discussing it only helps when it is factual and it seems in this case there is a lot of not so true information posted. I know some of the posters here were breeders and involved with both parties before the partnership unraveled. I actually met with Ramsauer and Van der Decken when they first started a verband sponsored organization in the US. It was not pretty in many way’s… Both registries have grown a lot the last 5 years.

I am a new breeder compared with all of you. I will never forget the first time I saw a WB. I don’t even know what he was registered but my jaw dropped and I couldn’t believe my eyes. It was a gelding by Pointmaker and it was the most spectacular horse I had ever seen! Up until this point I had a bunch of 25+ year old geldings running around for my kids to ride forward or backward, or fall off of. But when I saw that horse, I was changed forever! I bought a mare and bred her to Frohwind. It was such an amazing experience.

Nobody can really think ISR/OLD NA will ever give the name and brand back. These horses are Oldenburgs. They were bred with approved Oldenberg stallions out of approved Oldenberg mares, by the European Oldenburg standards. The ISR/OLD NA is breeding Oldenburgs!!

What I can’t understand is why they don’t give the O with the crown back to the GOV?? Because they are not using it anyway! My Old NA foals are branded with the O, crown, and NA on the sides. They are different brands. My horses are bred here and are Oldenburgs of North America.

I’m sorry for my ignorance but I’m really not getting it. GOV should use the O with the crown and ISR/OLD NA should use the O with crown and NA. They are breeding NA Oldenburgs which is a American Warmblood horse.

www.hiddenvalleyfarms.net

The GOV in Germany is using the O and Crown brand and all this about the brand has nothing to do with what is done in Germany. The OLDNA/ISR has the permission to use the O and crown brand in North America. No other group started by the GOV in NA has that right.

I understand all that. But why would ISR/OLD NA be so protective over the brand O with a crown when they’re not using it anyway. Wouldn’t it be a great peace offering of ISR/OLD NA to just give the brand back? GOV is not going to hurt their business. The reason I turn to ISR/Old NA so much is their PR. They’re fun to be around and they’re very educational. They take the time to explain what they like and dislike about each foal, mare and stallion. For young breeders like me, this is very valuable.

www.hiddenvalleyfarms.net

Wow - the longer this goes the more fiction in the posts. Amazing that people feel so comfortable stating their own interpretations or presumptions as facts as to who did what and who has the powers to do things. Amazing - really. Time does cure these wrongs but unfortunately they never get really long threads on here to get the truth out or clarify with FACTS.

Shame. Really it’s just a shame. I see statements made by people who cannot possibly know what they are talking about that are false and what’s worse they feel so comfortable doing this. Several posters on here repeatedly make statements which are totally counter to testimony and documentation presented to the courts. WOW! Seems like such a long and fragile branch to crawl out on.

Yes, I agree, Chris! I think that would make GOV breeders very happy!

I wonder what their response will be?

Ilona, would you like to take a stab at answering? :smiley: As Edgar said above, both registries are functioning just fine but GOV breeders would like to have their brand back. Please? :smiley:

[QUOTE=ise@ssl;2765769]
Wow - the longer this goes the more fiction in the posts. Amazing that people feel so comfortable stating their own interpretations or presumptions as facts as to who did what and who has the powers to do things. Amazing - really. on here to get the truth out or clarify with FACTS.

Shame. Really it’s just a shame. I see statements made by people who cannot possibly know what they are talking about that are false and what’s worse they feel so comfortable doing this. Several posters on here repeatedly make statements which are totally counter to testimony and documentation presented to the courts. WOW! Seems like such a long and fragile branch to crawl out on.[/QUOTE]

Wow!!! So I, as a breeder for 6 years, should keep my mouth shut as to my interpretations and presumptions as the facts as to who did what and to whom??? I am trying to breed Oldenburg horses… So I cannot possibly know what I’m talking about?? The mares and the stallions I’m breeding to are all approved Old/Na. So now they’re not approved??? You think because we’re new breeders, we have no ability to post here??? So you want us all to go to another breed where we have a voice???

You all need to get past the political part of all this. ISR/OLD NA is not going to give their brand back. Nor should they. Gov came and started the GOV. Now we have the Oldenburg Verband. Both American and Gernam sides. The American side was started 25 years ago, as was the german side. They both are legitimate German horse breeds.

www.hiddenvalleyfarms.net

Chris,
They are not breeds, they are registeries.

TBs, Arabians, and Trakehners are breeds (as are others). They are closed books, you breed a TB to a TB and you get a TB.

A warmblood is a combination of bloodlines and can be registered in one of many registeries. As the years go on, you see more and more blending of bloodlines, Hanoverians and Oldenburgs in particular.

These are geographical areas within Germany.

Imagine if you had a California registry, a Wisconsin registry, a Florida registry. The horse gets the label indicating where it was registered.

Anyone know of a link to a simple history of warmblood breeding and its evolution?

The use of AI, shipped semen and frozen semen means that bloodlines that would have been most common in one of the Germany breeding regions now show up all over Europe and even globally.

To my mind, registeries are marketing organizations. In Europe, it is extremely competitive to see whose horses rank in the top of the breeding stats.

In the US, you work with the organization(s) that fit your needs.

A specific horse might be Sandro Hit/Donnerhall/Feiner Stern and he could be registered Hanoverian, Oldenburg, RPSI, Dutch, Westphalian, and so on. Here, it could be Oldenburg NA, too.

It’s the same horse, no matter how it is branded or labeled.

[QUOTE=Oakstable;2765547]
I don’t think the reputation of the Oldenburg Verband had that much to do with the success of ISR. It was launched early on in the evolution of sporthorse breeding in the US. It could have been Meckelburgs, or any other breeding region, we didn’t know. That time was before the internet, web sites, and forums.[/QUOTE]

Oh, I totally disagree with you here. Oldenburg is the 3rd largest registry in Germany and has had a very high profile on the international scene for quite a long time now, with many top winning horses. I doubt very seriously that ISR would have made the enormous strides it did without capitalizing on the Oldenburg name and brand. Mecklenburg and the other small German registries just don’t have the same marketing appeal as Oldenburg. In fact, I know several breeders who live in other regions in Germany but who trailer their mares and foals to Oldenburg for approval/registration specifically because Oldenburg is a much better known organization than their home registry.

And, yes, it would be nice to have a win-win solution worked out, but I don’t see how. As others have pointed out, the Verband wants control of the breeding books and wants German breeding rules followed. ISR also wants control of the breeding books and wants to follow its own rules. What compromise is possible?

[QUOTE=talloaks;2765684]
The GOV in Germany is using the O and Crown brand and all this about the brand has nothing to do with what is done in Germany. The OLDNA/ISR has the permission to use the O and crown brand in North America. No other group started by the GOV in NA has that right.[/QUOTE]

Not quite. The Verband licensed ISR to run an Oldenburg studbook in N.A. Then the Verband declined to renew ISR’s license. Any permission to use the Oldenburg brand expired with the license. ISR/ONA is using the brand without permission from the Verband.

Just curious Chris - why does the German Oldenburg Verband allow the Danish Oldenburg Registry to exist automonously. GOV does NOT CONTROL this registry at all, they brand with the Danish O Crown and have existed and continue to exist with total control of their own breeding books. NO involvement or control by the GOV!