[QUOTE=beowulf;7725004]
I have to give a colossal eyeroll to anyone who is so anti-pit/bull breed - nothing shouts narrowminded ignorance more to me.[/QUOTE]
I’d question the use of eye-rolling in a written format, but given quality of your actual arguments, it’s probably best if you stick to grimaces and hand gestures to communicate.
That might work better if so many pit bull attacks, particularly the fatal ones, weren’t done by pets instead of strays. Pets which are registered American Bullies, like the thing in the Mia DeRouen killing. Pets which the owners had proudly, pre-attack, lauded on their FB pages as “ambassabulls” and specifically called pit bulls, like the Cindy Whisman killing. There are huge holes in the “can’t nobody ID a pit bull” argument.
No, all breeds are not inherently dangerous. All wolves are, all coyotes are, etc., because they are wild animals whose breeding choices have been fairly random. Dogs are domesticated animals whose breeding has been controlled by humans who wanted specialists. So we have herders and hunters and chasers and retrievers and killers. The only killers are the bulldogs. The terriers and the greyhounds, as predatory as they can be, are primarily about hunting and chasing. The only type that was created to close, to attack and attack until the target died, was the bulldog. Dogs will always bite. A few dogs will always attack. Breeds designed for guard/protection work will almost always have a higher incidence of this than breeds designed to trail a rabbit through a field. And a few dogs will always kill. That’s just a realistic understanding of the world. There will always be an individual that’s bizarrely aggressive, an abberation. Short of eliminating the species, you can’t eradicate the potential of canines to hurt humans. But you can remove 60% of the worst dog behavior by removing one strain of dog. Remove the bulldog, or rework it so the aggression is gone, and you have a vastly improved situation for both dogs and humans.