I wish she had just written her headline… and then if she had to keep writing, to stay much tighter to the topic about training the trainers.
In the comments, there was the great point made that much of the “trainer” training that we actually do provide… requires that you have 2nd level students.
Well, this is all wrong, isn’t it? You have to bumble around taking people’s money and hoping you can suck some in who can ride before anyone will teach you your profession? Sounds like the perfect recipe for success! I can’t understand why we don’t use the same techniques for brain surgery and engineering.
We do need to train the trainers. And we need to train them before they take their first student. How can we build this program?
The skill of coaching humans in athletic performance is quite different from actually doing that performance. There is a great deal of study and technique on this. We even have some very good equine professionals that I believe have been learning and gathering knowledge in this area - some that come to mind are Jane Bartle-Wilson (from the UK) and eventers David O’Connor and Brian Sabo. I listened to Jane Bartle-Wilson talk at length about how her Olympic committee had sent all the team coaches for this kind of training, and how valuable and eye-opening she found it to be.
(By the way, watching Jane teach relatively low level riders was one of the most educational and interesting experiences I have ever had, and she improved my own riding dramatically in just a few days, really opening some big doors for me.)
I’d point out that the three people I just mentioned aren’t just trainers of riders, but trainers of trainers - meaning that they teach the professionals they mentor not just to ride, but also to teach, and that all of them have students with high level students.
So there was a great essay in that title. I’m sorry that’s not the essay she chose to write.