Chariot Race in Ben-Hur - Chariot and Harnesses

Last night Mr. Butts watched (for the hundredth time) Ben-Hur. I watched the famous chariot race scene and wondered about the chariots and the harnesses. How much was poetic license and how much was authentic?

Here is a clip of the parade of the charioteers:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiq3Tm8Duns

The drivers of the 4 horses are holding only two reins. The bridles have no blinkers, and the bridles do not look very substantial IMHO.

Since Thomas, and perhaps others, have taken part in driving scenes for movies, I thought I’d inquire about the chariots and harnesses.

In Chapter VII of Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ, Lew Wallace writes, "There should be no difficulty in understanding the carriage known to us all as the chariot of classical renown. One has but to picture to himself a dray with low wheels and broad axle, surmounted by a box open at the tail-end. Such was the primitive pattern. Artistic genius came along in time, and, touching the rude machine, raised it into a thing of beauty-that, for instance, in which Aurora, riding in advance of the dawn, is given to our fancy.

The jockeys of the ancients, quite as shrewd and ambitious as their successors of the present, called their humblest turnout a two, and their best in grade a four; in the latter, the contested the Olympics and the other festal shows founded in imitation of them. 

The same sharp gamesters preferred to put their horses to the chariot all abreast; and for distinction they termed the two next the pole yoke-steeds, and those on the right and left outside trace-mates. It was their judgment, also, that, by allowing the fullest freedom of action, the greatest speed was attainable; accordingly, the harness resorted to was peculiarly simple; in fact, there was nothing of it save a collar round the animal's neck, and a trace fixed to the collar, unless the lines and a halter fall within the term. Wanting to hitch up, the masters pinned a narrow wooden yoke, or cross-tree, near the end of the pole, and, by straps passed through rings at the end of the yoke, buckled the latter to the collar. The traces of the yoke-steeds they hitched to the axle; those of the trace-mates to the top rim of the chariot-bed. There remained then but the adjustment of the lines, which, judged by the modern devices, was not the least curious part of the method. For this there was a large ring at the forward extremity of the pole; securing the ends to that ring first they parted the lines so as to give one to each horse and proceeded to pass them to the driver, slipping them separately through rings on the inner side of the halters at the mouth. 

With this plain generalization in mind, all further desirable knowledge upon the subject can be had by following the incidents of the scene occurring. 

The other contestants had been received in silence; the last comer was more fortunate. While moving towards the stand from which we are viewing the scene, his progress was signalized by loud demonstrations, by clapping of hands and cheers, the effect of which was to centre attention upon him exclusively. His yoke-steeds, it was observed, were black, while the trace-mates were snow-white. In conformity to the exacting canons of Roman taste, they had all four been mutilated; that is to say, their tails had been clipped, and, to complete the barbarity, their shorn manes were divided into knots tied with flaring red and yellow ribbons. 

In advancing, the stranger at length reached a point where the chariot came into view from the stand, and its appearance would of itself have justified the shouting. The wheels were very marvels of construction. Stout bands of burnished bronze reinforced the hubs, otherwise very light; the spokes were sections of ivory tusks, set in with the natural curve outward to perfect the dishing, considered important then as now; bronze tires held the fellies, which were of shining ebony. The axle, in keeping with the wheels, was tipped with heads of snarling tigers done in brass, and the bed was woven of willow wands gilded with gold."

Just wondering what you all think of the discrepancies in his descriptions and what was pictured in the movie. Which must have been more historically correct?

For the exciting part of the chariot race, see this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKnFLPV2yDY

What is historically correct could not be done to our animals and horses of today.
The harnesses and chariots were pretty close to the real thing in Ben Hur.
My grandfather drove mules with his freight wagons when he took freight from the Railroad station ot surrounding towns. The only ones with reins were the two leaders. One on each outside and the one line between them from bit ring to bit ring. If the outside rein was pulled it turned the head to the outside and the mule on the other side was pulled by the connecting rein.
The rest followed their lead mules.
He drove 8 mules hitched in pairs behind each other.
There was a write up on the horses of the movie Ben Hur. You might Google it and see if you can find out who wrote it. I remember when the movie came out and there was a hue and cry about how the horses were abused by racing them in the reckless manner shown in the Movie.
Actually the horses were never injured nor abused. From what some of the historians had written the Ben Hur movie was pretty tame.
The Roman and Greek horse racing was wild and men and horses were killed as part of the racing. Chariot racing was a real crowd thriller.

I loved the work on the harness in that movie. They were works of art. 

The team of white greys were actually Lippizaners. They were well trained and did very well in their job. The camera men were artists in catching the perfect angles to make it look worse that it really was.
Yes that race is thrilling to watch and the drivers were fantastic in their driving the horses. The art of filming and editing and taking sections to splice in was really used well in that movie.
The Egyptian harness were strapped to the horses neck. You can see them on the wall of the tombs in the Valley of the Kings. I think National Geographic had some photos of the chariot teams in one tomb about 10 years ago. Horses then were expendable. Just like men were. There was little mercy for either.
I am glad we live in a time where the horses are appreciated and treated more humanely.
If you ever read up on the Roman Military and the way they were trained it might surprise you.
JMHO
sadlmakr

You might find this of interest.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/trail/archaeology/wetwang/wetwang_chariot_queen_01.shtml

Something I was involved with and very close to my Yorkshire home

I would LOVE to know what the illustrious Thomas helped film wise…seeing as he has YET to tell us all the films he was instrumental on helping and being involved with…

Didn’t realize that Yorkshire was known for film making, pudding and small dogs yes, but films??? :winkgrin:

I watched the race scene again…the modern “Eurocollar” is the same design as they used in the movie.

[QUOTE=Susan P;5120805]
Didn’t realize that Yorkshire was known for film making, pudding and small dogs yes, but films??? :winkgrin:[/QUOTE]

You’d be surprised.

Wetwang which is where the excavations were for that particular chariot is actually in Yorkshire. The BBC filmed there for some time during that period.

Aside from that Brideshead Revisited was all filmed at Castle Howard which is situated just 4 miles from where I used to live.

Incidentally Castle Howard was also one of the first venues ever for the sport of Horse Driving Trials.

There’s been 2 Sherlock Holmes that I’ve done filmed at Lotherton Hall.

http://www.castlehoward.co.uk/

There’s been quite a lot of real life drama stuff filmed in and around York itself. Particularly stuff about:

Dick Turpen the famous highwayman that held up coaches in the 18th century lived and worked as a horse dealer near York. He actually stole horses to sell. He ultimately was arrested when he turned up to go hunting at a meet that’s a hunt that my father was eventually hunt master at and then he was hanged in York.

Guy Fawks was born, educated and lived in York most of his life. Though was hung, drawn and quartered in London for treason.

Jimmy (Alf) Wight better known as James Herriott was my neighbour and our family vet. I went to school with his son and daughter. All the “It shouldn’t happen to a vet” series were filmed in and around where he actually lived and practiced.

Agatha Christie - famously went “missing” from Yorkshire.

Then there’s Heartbeat - a long running TV series filmed where I was born and brought up.

and of course the Bronte sisters were born and brought up and died in Yorkshire and their novels and then the subsequent period drama films were all set and done there. Particularly Wuthering Heights and Jayne Eyre

Then there’s a mass more albeit with just a horse in sight in a distant field:

Calendar Girls. The award winning film about the ladies from the women’s institute who posed nude to raise money for Leukaemia Research.

Chariots of Fire. Another international award winner and filmed near Harrogate. Nothing to do with chariots though! It’s about a sportsman in the 1930’s I think? that refused to race on Sundays because he was religious.

There’ll have been a mass more that I’ve not a clue about but I can tell you that indeed Yorkshire is so well entrenched with film work that the National Media Museum devoted to film, photography, television and radio is based in Yorkshire.

What exactly did you help with? How did they use your expertise in the film? And was it the Sherlock Holmes with Robert Downy Jr. in it? Beautiful place you showed, I see why people would wish to be married there.

Thomas, in post #3 on this thread, did you mean to point us to your website or was there another website you were directing us to peruse?

I couldn’t find another link on that page.

I’d be interested in your experiences.

Duhhhhh sorry about that! I forgot to include the link