Well, this does look like a classic case of foxhunters being their own worst enemy. The ‘but we’ve always hunted here’ line of reasoning will doom us to failure. Never mind the antis, if we alienate the landowners, we won’t be hunting.
If the article is accurate, there is no way that anyone more than perhaps the huntsman or a whipper-in needs to go looking for those hounds, and even then the situations where you would have to affirmatively go get a hound are not frequent. I have, more than once, as a whipper-in, stopped at the property line, knowing of a landowner’s firm request that the hunt stay off. You just wait for the hounds to hunt on through and pick them up on the other side- or the huntsman blows for them and they come back.
If you know you are going to be hunting near forbidden territory, to me it only makes sense to contact a ‘hostile’ landowner BEFORE the meet and explain that we’ll be in the neighborhood, we certainly will respect your wishes and we hope you’ll understand that if the fox takes our hounds across your property we will ONLY enter your property if necessary to retrieve hounds, and we’ll ring your doorbell first if you wish.
Unfortunately like the rest of society I suppose, increasingly we have Masters who are more out of touch with the land and have little to no clue about successful landowner relations (and this isn’t new either, I can think of individuals going back 20 years who just ‘assumed’ that since certain landowners had always been okay with the hunt there was no need to visit them several times a year or extend other basic courtesies to them).
Pregreen- if I were you I’d have given Doc Addis a friendly call. I guess I’m appalled at the presumption of whomever that was that greeted you in such a manner- again, even the legendary need to remember their manners.