[QUOTE=DressageGeek “Ribbon Ho”;1942806]
I think it’s so as not to be blasphemous.
Personally - I am not religious. I am not certain if there is a God. I do believe that if I try to cause no harm to others, that if I try to do what I can for others, that that is the “right” thing. I don’t know if there’s heaven or hell or afterlife. These are questions I will never be able to answer (I guess I will find out about the heaven and hell issue when i die though).
What I do find offensive, is when people who do not have the education or scientific understanding and who just state that carbon dating is a load of hooey. I have yet to meet someone who claims this who actually even know what is involved in the process.
I have read both the Old and New Testatments. I do not take them literally. I believe that they are manuscripts written and translated and retranslated that are parables to help people assuage their fears about death and bad things, and to hopefully help them live better lives. On the other hand, I believe religion is a deeply personal issue and that each person makes this decision for themselves as to what they believe, so I can’t say what is wrong for me isn’t right for them.
However, when someone is simply incapable of passing judgement on a scientific issue because they lack the basic understanding of the science involved, they should return the favor and say, “This is what I believe, but i respect your right to disagree.”
Diversity is a great thing. There are actually people out there who do not like horses. There are people who actually prefer warmbloods to thoroughbreds!!! There are people who do Parelli without a Kohlrhabi stick!
It would be nice if we could share our views, learn from each other, and accept what we choose to accept.
that being said, I am simply appalled that the members of the House and Senate, for the most part, completely disregard valid scientific input when making their political decisions.[/QUOTE]
Well said DG.