My mom and I both had our ACLs reconstructed the same summer (her surgery was 2 weeks before mine). She did the graft option, I did the hamstring.
My rehab sucked, but then, I think rehab in general sucks from ACL reconstruction.
(“Sucked” as in, was painful, not out of the ordinary…taking a chunk of tissue that’s not meant to be used the way it’s now being used takes some getting used to. My mom didn’t fare any better, but she had “faster” progress because her surgeon was very aggressive with regard to post-surgery rehab and mine was very conservative, so her PT team was having her bend her knee much farther/sooner than mine was…end result was the same, though, both our knees are recovered. :))
My thigh was a little sore from the hamstring, but it wasn’t a big deal after a few days (especially compared to my knee, which was quite sore for a few weeks!). My surgeon recommended the hamstring option to me because I said I would be much more likely to be squatting (at the barn to do wraps, etc) than I would be doing lateral movements (apparently soccer players frequently do the patellar option so that it doesn’t affect their lateral ability). I was told squatting would be more painful if I did the patellar option, and this appears to be the case judging my mom and I (8 years post-surgery)…she says her knee gets stiff more than mine (which may also be due to age), and she has more discomfort doing things (like squatting) than I do.
My knee still aches a bit when it’s especially cold/wet out (and I live in England, go figure ;)), but otherwise it’s been night and day how well it’s been since the surgery (knock on wood). I resumed riding 2 months after surgery (with surgeon’s permission), and while it hurt for a while (I wasn’t allowed to use stirrups for the first month to avoid extra strain on my knee ;)), I didn’t have any issues.
Sorry if this is rather incoherent - just jotting down random thoughts about our experiences. Hope it helps. 