[QUOTE=Gestalt;6995334]
The description of the type and placement of whorls is very important. Color can change or be chemically altered, but a whorl is a whorl is a whorl.
Is it really possible to be “racist” when discussing horse coat color? Aye-yi-yi :disillusionment:[/QUOTE]
What do you want me to call a color bias in horses’, coatist? How about I just call it backwardest? Will that work and not offend your sense of propriety? Either way, ignoring the fundamental coat color characteristic, whether they are “raceyall” proclivities or not, is just stupid. Genetic characteristics, identifying the total animal, whorls, chestnuts, markings, and COLOR, are all part of the same package. It is different, it is interesting, and it should be taken into account. It is the genetic map of the breed. Look at Ben Green’s work, he looked at coat colors totally differently than the accepted way, he had the view that the coat had frequencies of color, like scientists denote the frequency of the color spectrum on wave patterns. I also find that interesting and a lot closer to deciding how the coat will turn out than to look at the hair coat of an animal which is known to change colors as it ages.