[QUOTE=Everythingbutwings;5420896]
“winner of over $48,000” isn’t exactly a stellar career. CANTER lists horses almost daily with impeccable breeding and winnings of far more than that.
.[/QUOTE]
Lucky won about $95,000 US in his career sticking with claimings and allowances. He was considered a low-level racehorse but a success in that he wasn’t a complete wash.
Again, IF you can breed horses who can WIN, no one will care what color they are. But if you breed for color, in the faint hope they might also be able to run, you’re doing it backwards. And if you’re breeding for flat racing, who cares if they can event? Show careers are where you send washouts. If you’re breeding for racing, no one wants to hear he turned out a three-day horse unless they’re planning to geld it and sell it to a show home when it’s done. When he has successful racing get (and whoever won $48,000, again, is on par with an okay low-grade claimer here unless that was hitting the board in two graded/group races, in which case it’s still not much but at least good company) that’s what you brag about.
If your grade stallion gets offspring, colored or boring bay, who can win serious money racing and they’ll let just anything run so they can prove it where it matters, people will want to breed race mares to him for racing offspring. If he can’t, no one cares if he produces pretty colors or not. And in the US, they wouldn’t be acceptable to anyone but sport breeders or possibly the paint racers (I don’t know what breeding you have to have to be acceptable to their registry–one of the two paint vs. pinto, only cares what they look like, the other has rules about what they can be related to and I’m never sure which was which. It’s very, very hard to believe someone who says color is their priority is going about it the right way, though.
If he could win at 1 1/4 on dirt or at 1 1/2 on grass against graded company, I’d buy offspring if they were pink with purple polka dots and built like a mule, provided they could be registered and raced here. But admitting mutts to the registry strictly to have something that looks like a pinto seems counter to the entire purpose of HAVING a registry. Why not get rid of all papers and just race whatever, show whatever. What next, gaited?
And I looked up Clantime–I see one blank spot on Brisnet for a horse bred in the 1920s (ie nearly a hundred years, yes, really) five gen back and that’s filled in on pedigreequery (fwiw). That’s hardly comparable to a sport horse with a grandparent of unknown origins, especially now it’s a lot easier to prove breeding if someone wanted to argue a horse was an unpapered TB–pull DNA. If they’re bred in the last twenty years, shows up easily enough.