[QUOTE=goodmorning;8355098]
Why? Is this based on a sentiment you have on TB mares as a whole, or quantitative trait of this stallion? You then state a strongly framed mare, ok, whats your definition of that? Contender doesnât come to mind, but we could have different opinions on that. And why are you defining it with a âContender mareâ when your says US breeders should concentrate on the mare-lineâŠno stamm or even dam-sire listed? You go right back to the stallion there.
You can study the mare all you want, you still have to study the stallion. With frozen semen itâs silly to think that when evaluating a stallion you are doing it with one mare in mind for this very moment or breeding season. Short-sighted approach.[/QUOTE]
Youâre absolutely right in questioning my opinion. However , I speak from personal experience and having watched the stallion for some time, breeding my best mare to him, and evaluating the outcome I then witness the result of an educated decision.
I certainly have nothing against TB mares, but I would not breed one to this stallion based on what I know. By all means if you want to make a cross to him with a TB go for it.
No definitions have been made as I am not an encyclopedia, however, my Contender mare produced a superb son from CIF and I would do it again knowing that it worked. It was a calculated decision to use a Contender/Laval I mare from Stamm 474a, but since you donât know my mare then my statement is true IMO and so it is of others who know herâŠa strongly framed mare is important when crossings to this stallion.
But Iâve been wrong before as have a lot of other breeders.