Not really to be honest, @paw . Again speaking from experience in the modern world of wealth (where to retire in the US as a two person household you should have about $4m in retirement funds given the current economic climate). Microwealth (under $5m in assets not including primary residence) is perhaps achieved this way, but not levels above that, which I would sincerely hope OP is above considering their willingness to spend $200k on a sport pet for their kid.
I call it $1,000,000 decisions vs $50,000 decisions. Ultra high wealth folks worry about the 7 figure not the 5 figure. $60k is not âworth the effort of nickel and dimeingâ as someone who can throw $200k around for a sport pet for kids can easily make up $60k in month or so with passive / minimal effort. Many mid career level Big Tech workers vest RSUs in that range quarterly, post tax in addition to our base salaries of sometimes approaching half a million/year ⊠I am curious how spending patterns will change with the recent spirals of layoffs. Those figures come from a lot of my peers who are now former Meta and Twitter employees.
Folks who are ultra high wealth (which would be someone spending $200k on a kidâs sport pet) donât need to expend effort on navigating tiny tiny tiny savings like 5 figure decisions. So I believe OP when they say they arenât super wealthy⊠hence I am saying ⊠hm do you really need a $200k horse for your kid?
@meupatdoesâs comment exemplifies this perfectly. If you have the skill to generate âthatâ wealth, it doesnât take âmuch relativeâ effort to generate the $60k that is being squabbled over.
But maybe Iâm just coming from a very CPA/ former ibanker, conservative with money tech worker perspective that you shouldnât throw $200k into a sport pet if $60k in commissions inspires you to ask strangers on the internet questions about it.
Many folks manage their money far less conservatively than I do & I donât have kids to feel compelled to fund dreams of my offspring, YMMV.
I think as a parent who isnât "wealthy enough to not care too much about small potatoes of $60k relative to a $200k transaction " - I would not be spending $200k on the kidâs horses.
Feels weird - the tax bracket these folks play in is definitely above the effective 30% rate (sincerely hope generally hitting close to effective 37% rate meaning that most of their annual income is above $539k and taxed at 37%) - arenât they used to their bonuses, commissions, and other incomes taxed at relative terms and arenât they comfortable with negotiating contracts to best serve them given the situational industry and general environment. Iâd think one stays wealthy by having excellent financial negotiation skills, personally.