[QUOTE=FineAlready;7004784]
Fair enough on the “claims” vs. “claiming” race thing. It’s a lazy shorthand I shouldn’t use.
And, honestly, I also provided kind and helpful advice at the beginning…but I am not going to sit by and smile when an owner like this sends a mare like this to a low end track and says she is then going to breed her.
By the way, if you don’t think you can tell a lot from the racing charts, you are wrong. There are also some videos of this mare from Arlington (one where she wins and one where she is third). In the one where she is third, she breaks from the starting gate and just basically runs sideways. It’s from three years ago, so probably not indicative of how she runs now, but her charts do contain a lot of comments about being erratic or green, even in later years. More of an observation than anything.[/QUOTE]
Believe me, I know what can show up in a chart (been a jock/trainer/owner/breeder for 30 yrs). However, it doesnt always show the clear picture. We own a TB that raced untill he was 11, ran 104 times and retired sound (he also made close to a million)…he ran where he could win when he got older, and yes, some of those were in claiming races. Some days he didn’t run good on paper, some days if the jock cracked him one to many times he ran eratic, but was he happy with what he was doing? Extremely!
My point is you can’t always tell that a horse is used up by a few races, or even by the comments. My horses first stake race and one of his early races, he tried to drop the rider behind the gate, wouldnt load and ran all over the track. He ended up beating Real Quiet that day.