Court date for Michael Barisone?

[La-LaPopRider]

@eggbutt

didn’t cause you to be in the fix you are in. Absolutely I have posted every single civil court document because it is important for people to see you, know you and get a glimpse of the legal process.

Please explain “the fix,” I’m in. Is that a southern term?

I can guarantee you, anyone I care to know, “sees me,” just fine. There is literally not one thing you can post, do or say which would ever make anyone I spend my time with, view me any differently. They’ve learned quite a lot about you though! Not just small things, like your inability to find another adjective beside “fascinating,” or an alternative noun, than “myriad.”

I’m so glad you posted this. While you & others are under the impression anything I post here weakens the criminal cases against Barisone & Cox, others and attorneys view exactly what you have just stated, as a great help to the causes of mine (&others.)

What was it you said your “cause,” was, again? Oh. Forgot. For “people to see me, know me?” And you think they’re (again, anyone I care to allow or keep in my friends circle) gonna rethink my relationships with then Bc YOU …… (fill in blank with literally ANY verb.) Yahhh…. ooookay!

[eggbutt]

(post withdrawn by author, will be automatically deleted in 24 hours unless flagged)

[IdahoRider]

@La-LaPopRider

Oh yes. I feel completely “dispelled,” by your shutting down of my “narratives.” Where did I go? I can’t locate myself! Help!!!

Well, it looks like you were in that department store, following and secretly recording that person so you could show them bending over and showing their panties so you could post it to Facebook and make fun of them.

And when I pointed out that you might want to take that down because you could have filmed a minor child who was unknowingly showing their panties on Facebook, you mocked me, called me “IdahoRider” as if that were a news flash and defended your behavior as harmless because you weren’t recording them in particular, you just happened to have a route through the store that was right behind them and your whispered conversation with your BF about “OMG! Look at her bend over” before accidentally following the person and “waiting for them to do it again” had nothing to do with an ill intent on your part.

That is where you were and that is who you are.
Sheilah

[eggbutt]

@IdahoRider

@La-LaPopRider

Oh yes. I feel completely “dispelled,” by your shutting down of my “narratives.” Where did I go? I can’t locate myself! Help!!!

Well, it looks like you were in that department store, following and secretly recording that person so you could show them bending over and showing their panties so you could post it to Facebook and make fun of them.

And when I pointed out that you might want to take that down because you could have filmed a minor child who was unknowingly showing their panties on Facebook, you mocked me, called me “IdahoRider” as if that were a news flash and defended your behavior as harmless because you weren’t recording them in particular, you just happened to have a route through the store that was right behind them and your whispered conversation with your BF about “OMG! Look at her bend over” before accidentally following the person and “waiting for them to do it again” had nothing to do with an ill intent on your part.

That is where you were and that is who you are.
Sheilah

Imagine if that video had been posted by someone like SW! People would be losing their minds!

[IdahoRider]

@eggbutt

Imagine if that video had been posted by someone like SW! People would be losing their minds!

I was more than happy to give LK the benefit of the doubt regarding the entire Barisone situation. Until I saw her make that post on her Facebook page a week or two ago. I don’t think she should have been shot, regardless of how freaked Barisone might have been.

But based on her mirthful, public debasement of another human being who was a flat out stranger to LK, who could easily have been a minor child? I am done. I will follow the case(s) because I love true crime in general. But I refuse to give LK the benefit of anything because that was an horrendous thing to do. Basically shaming a stranger for shits and giggles.
Sheilah

[La-LaPopRider]

@Knights_Mom

Ok it is a felony

Yes! Only took you almost two years of calling me a liar to locate this! As stated- Ruth Cox was charged with a felony. Guess I wasn’t “making that up.” We all know no one here is big enough to backpedal. Small enough only to “double down,” on things unbeknownst to you! Of which there are MANY.

So weird. Nancy “the joke,” Jaffer has refused to report THIS FACT while you, oddly, have not opened a “New” thread regarding this “revelation!”

Did Cox - the licensed PSYCHIATRIST
GIVE MB a GUN? OR, is her claim that he stole it? Imagine if she actually tried claiming BOTH! THAT would be crazy! I hope for her sake there is no hard evidence proving the exact chain of events which lead to Cox driving through the night from New Bern NC for the specific purpose of BRINGING her (possibly) defaced, (definitely) illegal firearm to “lend,” to her ex patient, for the “specific purpose of committing unlawful acts.” Oh wait. There IS!

Goodnight!
I have a feeling I’m gonna sleep like a baby tonight! Oh hey, feel free to “call me out,” on any other “inconsistencies,” in my story. (There have been none. But, best of luck to you!)

[La-LaPopRider]

@IdahoRider

Well, it looks like you were in that department store, following and secretly recording that person so you could show them bending over and showing their panties so you could post it to Facebook and make fun of them.

And when I pointed out that you might want to take that down because you could have filmed a minor child who was unknowingly showing their panties on Facebook, you mocked me, called me “IdahoRider” as if that were a news flash and defended your behavior as harmless because you weren’t recording them in particular, you just happened to have a route through the store that was right behind them and your whispered conversation with your BF about “OMG! Look at her bend over” before accidentally following the person and “waiting for them to do it again” had nothing to do with an ill intent on your part.

That is where you were and that is who you are.
Sheilah

……

[eggbutt]

@La-LaPopRider

@Knights_Mom

Ok it is a felony

Yes! Only took you almost two years of calling me a liar to locate this! As stated- Ruth Cox was charged with a felony. Guess I wasn’t “making that up.” We all know no one here is big enough to backpedal. Small enough only to “double down,” on things unbeknownst to you! Of which there are MANY.

So weird. Nancy “the joke,” Jaffer has refused to report THIS FACT while you, oddly, have not opened a “New” thread regarding this “revelation!”

Did Cox - the licensed PSYCHIATRIST
GIVE MB a GUN? OR, is her claim that he stole it? Imagine if she actually tried claiming BOTH! THAT would be crazy! I hope for her sake there is no hard evidence proving the exact chain of events which lead to Cox driving through the night from New Bern NC for the specific purpose of BRINGING her (possibly) defaced, (definitely) illegal firearm to “lend,” to her ex patient, for the “specific purpose of committing unlawful acts.” Oh wait. There IS!

Goodnight!
I have a feeling I’m gonna sleep like a baby tonight! Oh hey, feel free to “call me out,” on any other “inconsistencies,” in my story. (There have been none. But, best of luck to you!)

…

[eggbutt]

@La-LaPopRider

@eggbutt

didn’t cause you to be in the fix you are in. Absolutely I have posted every single civil court document because it is important for people to see you, know you and get a glimpse of the legal process.

Please explain “the fix,” I’m in. Is that a southern term?

I can guarantee you, anyone I care to know, “sees me,” just fine. There is literally not one thing you can post, do or say which would ever make anyone I spend my time with, view me any differently. They’ve learned quite a lot about you though! Not just small things, like your inability to find another adjective beside “fascinating,” or an alternative noun, than “myriad.”

I’m so glad you posted this. While you & others are under the impression anything I post here weakens the criminal cases against Barisone & Cox, others and attorneys view exactly what you have just stated, as a great help to the causes of mine (&others.)

What was it you said your “cause,” was, again? Oh. Forgot. For “people to see me, know me?” And you think they’re (again, anyone I care to allow or keep in my friends circle) gonna rethink my relationships with then Bc YOU …… (fill in blank with literally ANY verb.) Yahhh…. ooookay!

…

[Knights_Mom]

@IdahoRider

Law drama can be fascinating which explains the overwhelming number of such shows on TV.

[La-LaPopRider]

@eggbutt

Why can’t you see the posts for yourself? Is one of the forums off limits to you now?

Amazing. Simply amazing.

Are you attempting to pressure me & others to view and/or participate in a thread on this Coth forum? One - actually two- which (based on hundreds of screenshots sent to me) are entirely false & fabricated, include serious defamatory, libelous & false allegations- repeated again & again as “fact, ” by certain posters, KNOWING those posts violate COTH’s community rules & guidelines, and any participation by me- on your most recent two open threads, would in fact “weaken,” any upcoming …. legal anything’s??

Not biting. Sorry not sorry.

[CanteringCarrot]

@Knights_Mom

@IdahoRider

Law drama can be fascinating which explains the overwhelming number of such shows on TV.

This is quite true.

I feel as though people who don’t work in the legal system/aren’t well educated in the system, find it more interesting than it actually is it’s so dramatic and fast on TV.

[Knights_Mom]

LOL yes, the quick resolutions and case conclusions on TV sort of spoil you.

[Jenerationx]

@3PonyFarm

Someone asked a question about Ruth Cox. I searched on the Municipal Court Case Search and if it is the same person there is a case with an issue date of 10/17/19 of a 4th degree weapons-manu-transpo/disp/defacement weapons listed as an active case.

@Knights_Mom

Ok it is a felony but it’s the lowest charge under this type of weapons charge. Top sentence is 18 months and if first offense may plea down to a misdemeanor or ACD depending on gun sentence mandates in that state.

Interesting. Thank you for finding that.

Reading the law, it seems that if a gun was transported and given to another person, that would be second degree, not fourth.

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-2c/section-2c-39-9/

[Knights_Mom]

@Jenerationx

@3PonyFarm

Someone asked a question about Ruth Cox. I searched on the Municipal Court Case Search and if it is the same person there is a case with an issue date of 10/17/19 of a 4th degree weapons-manu-transpo/disp/defacement weapons listed as an active case.

@Knights_Mom

Ok it is a felony but it’s the lowest charge under this type of weapons charge. Top sentence is 18 months and if first offense may plea down to a misdemeanor or ACD depending on gun sentence mandates in that state.

Interesting. Thank you for finding that.

Reading the law, it seems that if a gun was transported and given to another person, that would be second degree, not fourth.

https://law.justia.com/codes/new-jersey/2013/title-2c/section-2c-39-9/

Interesting. I’m intrigued.

[Jenerationx]

I could be wrong. I’m reading i.

i.Transporting firearms into this State for an unlawful sale or transfer. Any person who knowingly transports, ships or otherwise brings into this State any firearm for the purpose of unlawfully selling, transferring, giving, assigning or otherwise disposing of that firearm to another individual is guilty of a crime of the second degree. The temporary transfer of a firearm while hunting or target shooting, the transfer of any firearm that uses air or carbon dioxide to expel a projectile, or the transfer of an antique firearm shall not constitute a violation of this subsection.

Which seems to contradict LK’s claim:

@La-LaPopRider

I hope for her sake there is no hard evidence proving the exact chain of events which lead to Cox driving through the night from New Bern NC for the specific purpose of BRINGING her (possibly) defaced, (definitely) illegal firearm to “lend,” to her ex patient, for the “specific purpose of committing unlawful acts.” Oh wait. There IS!

It will be interesting to see how that pans out, and where MB claims the gun came from.

[Scribbler]

Yes.

From previous threads I understand RC is a retired nurse, not a psychiatrist. I understood she was at one point sleeping in front of her stall with a gun. Obviously I dont know if that’s true or not. But if it was true, it’s obvious she didn’t bring the gun over state lines just for someone else to use.

[MorganSercu]

Certainly not something anyone would expect from someone 40-ish years old.

[CanteringCarrot]

@Scribbler

Yes.

From previous threads I understand RC is a retired nurse, not a psychiatrist. I understood she was at one point sleeping in front of her stall with a gun. Obviously I dont know if that’s true or not. But if it was true, it’s obvious she didn’t bring the gun over state lines just for someone else to use.

Yeah, actually, that’s sort of odd. The time-line of the gun comung into play leading up to the shooting isn’t so clear.

[yaya]

@Ambitious_Kate

I wonder if painting it pink would qualify for the illegal alterations.

It may not have been painted. Glock makes a pink handgun.