Crosspost from Off Topic: Byrd Rareshide’s Retirement

Cross posting from off topic by request, since most of the horses removed are retired hunters and jumpers. If you or a friend has a horse remaining there with the understanding that specific horse is healthy and well fed, please understand that is likely not the case.

@2bayboys kindly wrote the below unless you own a Haflinger whose owner I have not yet located.

(A brief note. Some of the horses have now been diagnosed with heart murmurs, when previously their hearts were healthy. This is consistent with starvation, as the body tries to consume its own organs to stay alive.)

On February 1, 2023, Kimberly St. John received a call from a veterinarian about her horse Loki. Loki, a 12-year-old off the track Thoroughbred gelding, lived at a retirement farm for horses in Goochland County, Virginia called Byrd’s Retirement Foundation. The farm, owned and operated by Byrd Rareshide, has been operating as a retirement facility for years and was organized as a 501©3 foundation in 2022. Kimberly had sent him there to live a leisurely life after Loki was diagnosed with kissing spines and it was determined he should no longer be ridden.

On February 1, the farm owner called the vet to examine Loki for a facial swelling, not an emergency. But after evaluating the horse, the vet contacted Kimberly with very serious news. Her horse was emaciated, with a body condition score (BCS) of just 1.5. His temperature was low, and so was his heart rate.

Kimberly immediately made arrangements to pick up her horse and was shocked at his physical state. But she was even more shocked that the farm owner, a lifelong, knowledgeable horsewoman who came with multiple recommendations from professionals and who was herself a recognized judge for Virginia Horse Shows Association local hunter shows, would have allowed her horse to fall into such a dangerously unhealthy condition.

After moving Loki to the barn of a trusted professional and friend for rehabilitation, Kimberly took her story to Facebook and warned other horse owners about her horse’s horrible care at Byrd’s Retirement Foundation. And it turns out her horse was not alone.

So far SEVENTEEN horses have been removed by their owners (with help from MANY volunteers in the community) and transported to veterinary clinics and equine rehabilitation centers. Most of these horses had BCS scores lower than three and more than one was suffering from impaction colic due to severe malnutrition and dehydration. They will all require weeks or months of a careful refeeding protocol to bring them back to health, and some may forever have damage to their hearts and other organs due to the effects of starvation.

Some of the other horses being nursed back to health include:

Kallie, a 19-year-old Arabian mare who retired from the show ring after a career as a Western Pleasure star. Kallie’s owner lives out of state and flew in to check on her as soon as she became aware of the situation. Kallie’s BCS was 2 and she is currently recovering from a bowel impaction at the Veterinary Rehabilitation Service of Virginia.

Ruby, a 23-year-old Canadian Sport Horse. Ruby is a chestnut mare whose photo showing her pitifully thin body was shared widely on social media after Loki’s story became known. Somebody finally recognized the mare and notified her owner, and Ruby is now receiving treatment at Woodside Equine Clinic.

The owners of these horses and all the others entrusted their care IN GOOD FAITH to Byrd’s Retirement Foundation. They paid for boarding services every month expecting that their retired partners would receive adequate feed and water to remain in good health for as long as possible. This obviously did not happen.

The owners are working with appropriate authorities to make sure this doesn’t happen to other horses at this facility. But they are faced with a mountain of unexpected veterinary bills and long term rehab.

6 Likes

In response to this and other events close to me in recent days I posted the following on my personal page. Sharing here also. I do think perhaps in places where there is less controversy surrounding humane euthanasia (ie Europe) there are far fewer starving or suffering animals.

Dear horse friends. There have been recent events near to me that made me think about and consider how we treat horses in our culture and in our lives. There are certainly different levels of acceptable care for horses, and not all horses need or do well in a stalled environment–indeed, many thrive and do well in a herd environment living out when provided with adequate food, companionship, forage and water. When we humans utilize horses for our own pleasure and gain, whether it be enjoying the trails, showing for fun or upper level competition in sport or racing we owe it to the animal to ensure when they no longer can do the job they have a soft landing spot where we ensure basic needs are being met OR we humanely euthanize them so they do not end up in a situation that may be worse than death. These animals give so much of themselves for our pleasure or ego or joy; so many are simply discarded to unknown or horrific fates once they can no longer do a job. IF the financial burden is too much to bear for the remainder of their lives to ensure they have basic needs met, PLEASE consider humane euthanasia rather than selling under false pretenses, rehoming to an unknown person as a companion animal or putting them in a retirement facility where you cannot personally check on their well being. There are plenty of fates for an animal that are worse than a painless death provided by someone who cares.

23 Likes

My understanding was that this wasn’t a financial issue for the owners. They were paying board. I think that’s okay, even if it’s not nearby. There are plenty of wonderful retirement barns in less populated areas. The problem is that the barn didn’t do what it promised it would. Am I misunderstanding the facts? I’ve just heard about the situation in bits and pieces. Not a cogent explanation.

21 Likes

My comment was more a general statement on responsible horse ownership. I do believe she was charging board but at a significantly reduced rate. So financially it perhaps was a more inexpensive option for many owners.

2 Likes

I’m don’t know what going rate is in Central VA but I know at least one owner was paying $590 per month. Her horse was supposed to be getting extra feed.

Not sure where that extra feed was going.
This horse is nineteen.

16 Likes

I am also not trying to imply fault with any owners in this situation–only that as owners the ultimate responsibility rests with us. This situation just proves that although a place may seem reputable or the retirement farm knowledgeable it is still imperative that an owner or their representative check on their horses in person from time to time.

5 Likes

This mares owner said she made it clear that whatever her horse needed, she would pay for it.

Now she’s paying for vet and rehab.

Same mare in her younger years:

image

26 Likes

Are their feet all as bad as the chestnut’s?

1 Like

It was not a significantly reduced rate. Not sure why you think this. That is not the case and I am honestly getting tired of people blaming the horse owners in this case. They hired a barn to do something that the barn was not doing. The fault here is with the barn, not the owners.

Your world it might never have a situation where your horse is not right by you all the time for you to have a thumb on their every breath, but lots of people have very busy lives and it is not wrong to hire a barn to make sure your retired horse is well cared for. It is wrong for that barn to then turn around and starve your horse, all while telling you that your horse is doing fine and them taking your money that should be buying that horse feed and care.

Edit to add - I am not against euthanasia, so don’t assume that is why I find your stance so wrong here.

34 Likes

Based on the condition of the horses, I’m surprised the vet was even called. And, I agree…not everyone can be around all the time. I’ve had people leave their horses w me for months at a time because of travel/relocation for work, etc. (I do send “hi mom” pictures.). I’m glad someone stepped in to help.

9 Likes

I am not blaming the owners here at all. Just saying as owners the ultimate responsibility always rests with us to be sure our horses are in a good place. Obviously what happened was absolutely the owner of the farm’s fault and failure to provide care. But we can all
learn from this. I know if my horses ever have to be off my own farm for care I will definitely check on them or have them checked on, no matter where they are.

6 Likes

You are right, we can all learn from this.

I guess I just feel these threads should be about supporting these poor owners and not telling them how they did this wrong and they should have done it some other way. Which is how your posts read to me.

This barn owner is horrible. The trusting people who boarded there are not the problem.

33 Likes

In this particular case this farm owner was recommended by multiple professionals. She was a VHSA associate judge hired by all the local show series. She sponsored classes at rated shows. When you saw her at shows with her own horses, she and her horses were always impeccably turned out and she rides well and wins a lot. I can completely understand horse owners leaving their retirees in her care and never thinking they needed to check if they were actually receiving what was promised.

29 Likes

I hope there is a very good way to publicly embarrass her. Perhaps that’s where the money went- her showing budget.

6 Likes

I guess that’s exactly my point about how we can learn from this going forward. Perhaps we can’t really trust anyone unless we see things with our own eyes. There is plenty of corruption and misrepresentation in the equine world. I know many owners do absolutely right by their horses, and are trying to do right by them now. I guess there was at least one owner there who did not see any problem with her horse’s care, even though the condition of it was quite bad. So the moral is–check things out with your own eyes. Or a personal trusted friend. I absolutely support those owners trying to help their horses recover from this horrible situation–let’s not let all this happen ever again, that’s all.

3 Likes

This person is like an embezzler. They take another person’s money and rationalize why they deserve/ need it. She was probably supporting her own horses with what the boarders were paying and her “Let the horses drop weight in the winter so they will be fine on spring grass” was her way of rationalizing the lack of care for her client’s horses. And being totally oblivious to their condition and needs. Unfortunately people are not always the image they carefully project.

13 Likes

Unfortunately, for many people who boarded with her, Byrd was that “trusted friend”.

See the problem?

17 Likes

Yes. I am glad this has been made so public so the truth is out there.

1 Like

This is why I send pictures constantly to my free leases owner. Insane owners didn’t request current pictures or FaceTime.

Not the owners fault, but should be a conversation on how to prevent it from happening.

3 Likes

I agree

  1. As owners the buck stops with us.
  2. Humane euthanasia can be the right choice, even if a horse is not terminally ill.

I think this situation though, is a poor situation in which to cite these two principles. Here you had owners who were willing to do the right thing and were paying for promised quality care of their retirees by a knowledgeable person with a good reputation. They did make a responsible choice. They were being defrauded by someone who, for reasons I’m unaware, took their money, cheated the owners, neglected the horses, and concealed the horse’s conditions.

I am incredibly angry at this situation but not angry at the owners and while I agree with your points in the abstract, it just seems particularly uncool to use THIS situation, where the owners were actually quite responsible, as a springboard to make these points. These owners AND the horses were victims here. Could the owners have done more? I suppose. But it really feels like victim blaming to be arguing that.

26 Likes