While I am as fond of “wildlife” as the next person I find it inexcusable for people to put such hysterical nonsense forward as fact.
Did someone read an old foxhunting book and just assume that this was done in the U.S. without checking their facts? I have a decent sized collection of books on foxhunting. All but one (a signed! copy of Mackay-Smith) are from the U.K. and the majority are over one hundred years old.
Nowhere in the U.S. is this done. Do you think these people really believe that it IS done or are they knowingly libeling the hunt? One would hope they would actually do some research before freaking out and making fools of themselves because they read somewhere that this was done somewhere in the past. They just couldn’t be bothered to actually look into it?
As an aside, foxes in the area that I live in regularly kill people’s cats, and coyotes kill little dogs. You cannot let cats out at night in many areas of town unless you don’t mind possibly never seeing them again. Years ago, my brother’s little dog was killed by a coyote in broad daylight in a field by his house. They are indeed a danger to pets and livestock.
That’s beside the point however. No one is doing holding up fox cubs to be eaten by hounds and I don’t blame the hunt for being horrified at being accused. I hope there are members of the hunt who are (or have friends in) the legal profession and will pursue these people for damages an apology and a retraction.