BNT knows exactly what they sent you. And where the lease is misleading. Better than anyone.
So … Wild guess based on negative life experiences … My guess is that the trainer set this up with intention. Doesn’t treat horses well who aren’t big earners, keeps their cost as low as possible. Then BNT found an ammy to take this one! On a lease-to-own, hoping ammy pays it out. But either way the horse is off the trainer’s bill for now, and trainer gets portion or all of lease payments — it’s a win-win deal for the trainer.
Maybe trainer is counting on the ammy to suck it up and not want to send it back ‘into those conditons’, fairly enough. Counting on ammy to avoid confrontation and pay out to protect the horse. So why not do this. If you see what I mean.
Personally I recommend extensive photos and video to document the horse’s condition, asap, because horses can start looking better quickly with some good care.
At the very least I would be in touch with the trainer with outrage. Demanding a revised deal if I am to keep the horse – otherwise BNT gets the horse back (guessing BNT does not want the horse back). I’d send the photos & videos and without saying so directly I’d let a little scare set in that those might go up on youtube / facebook at any time.
So, flip the usual script that puts BNT in the power position and switch it so that the ammy is now in the power position because ammy now knows something not nice about the trainer – the condition of the horse and the misleading lease.
I would demand a revised lease contract. Maybe no payments for 2 months? Plus I’m guessing that there is no way to assess the horse’s capabilities until later.
Depending on my personal options to care for this horse even if it were a lifetime pasture pet (given this is currently an unknown), I would offer the trainer an alternative deal that would relieve them of the horse but not nearly at the price they wanted.
Because who else can the BNT lease to … especially once other people know about the horse’s condition? If it comes to that.
In situations like this sometimes professionals will just take a deal that gets rid of the problem for them. They get some money, and maybe the big win is to get the horse off their bill.
I wouldn’t worry about lease terms that don’t allow this option because none of that matters isfthe trainer agrees with a change. A simple one page amendment is all that is necessary.
I wouldn’t worry about burning any bridges because that’s just me. The BNT already burned the bridge with the contract and the horse’s condition.
Just an alternative to consider.