It’s always so fun when the sanctimoniousness starts around here…
It’s more fun to be able to handle and ride what you have without “enhancing” it chemically.
Either by choosing the right horse mentally and physically able to do the job ~or~ the rider being able to mentally and physically to handle/ride the horse.
Depo if for the rider, not the horse because the rider isn’t capable to handling or competing the animal without it. The horse doesn’t care at all whether or not it shows and does well.
And frankly I am SO over the fundamentalist, anti-drug, argument. Why don’t you stop sounding off on each posting and instead just make it your signature line? It’d save us all a lot of time and you a lot of typing.
Have to somewhat agree with you here. Some folks are SO over the fundamentals…of riding well and training appropriate horses.
And it does seem the drugging is definitely for saving time…time used for learning to actually handle and ride and train the horse instead of chemically altering it down to the level of whoever is in the tack.
Some of us have the opinion that the rider should choose the appropriate horse for the level of the rider and the level of the competition. (that means mentally capable horses too) If the horse is too much, then find a horse that isn’t too much for the rider and/or trainer. If the horse has the talent but not the personality for the competition…don’t drug it into the personality you want it to have.
And nope, not going to put it as a signature line. It’s an open discussion BB and there aren’t any rules that state nobody is allowed to point out when competitors are cheating and taking the chemical solution to training. Even if those publicly admitting to being sub-par at riding or training their horses or cheating in competition don’t like that.