Doing business with JILL BURNELL? BEWARE.

rappazini, you got what I got! She must be cutting and pasting them. :smiley: How does one retract if it is already out there?
Sounds like as male personal problem to me… :lol: “having problems retracting?”

[QUOTE=runwayz;6515310]
rappazini, you got what I got! She must be cutting and pasting them. :smiley: How does on retract if it is already out there?
Sounds like as male personal problem to me… :lol: “having problems retracting?”[/QUOTE]

I think they made a movie, “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind”, about that – about retracting personal problems – not the male problems.

Eh. Nevermind. Neither “Eternal Sunshine” nor “Spotless Mind” could possibly be applicable here.

“Hrm scans around home now what style is this home decorated in ?”

"Oh that would be faux JB …although we had a tight budget so we could only afford a pony AV redwine rack , we could not afford full sized dog poop so we had to settle for chihuahua. Although we did splurge on the bathroom and went with a pair of peacock carcasses to really show off the tub !

Next…! Lynwood your PM should arrive in 5…4…3…2…

[QUOTE=Lynnwood;6515314]
“Hrm scans around home now what style is this home decorated in ?”

"Oh that would be faux JB …although we had a tight budget so we could only afford a pony AV redwine rack , we could not afford full sized dog poop so we had to settle for chihuahua. Although we did splurge on the bathroom and went with a pair of peacock carcasses to really show off the tub ![/QUOTE]

Just so you are aware. You’re likely to end up in detention. See you there.

Oh yeah, that makes sense. Her “attorney” is telling her to PM everybody and asking them to remove their posts. Is he also telling her to talk smack about you as well? :lol: Maybe it’s not so much of an “attorney” as it is the little voices inside her head. Sad to see that the “attorney” also seems to have a selective moral compass. :no:

[quote=JoZ;6515226]I’m having fun with this one. Where would one come up with the props? I know I don’t have dead chickens, dog feces and breeding equipment in various stages of decay just lying about waiting for me to hatch a conspiracy.

[/quote]

This is my theory from page 25 of this thread:

[quote=Daventry;6510741]So are you saying that the brother and sister-in-law came over the night before, fed the dog a whole lot of Taco Bell, came back the next morning and squeezed the crap out of him, then choked the chickens, then grabbed the camera and snapped a bunch of photos and then stole the camera?

Sorry, I’m just trying to get all of the facts straight.
[/quote]

[QUOTE=ldaziens;6515317]
Just so you are aware. You’re likely to end up in detention. See you there.[/QUOTE]

Eat my Shorts!

Have been following all along, from first threads. I don’t need to state my position.

I’m just chiming in to say it would be nice if things could stay on track. The true information is getting lost for people that aren’t checking in every hour and have to go through 6 rather silly pages to catch up at the end of the day.

While laughter is quite powerful just remember this is very real for many people. Keep it light hearted, but please don’t make light of it. Have respect for what is trying to be accomplished here.

A judge will end up reading this thread, I’m quite sure, so let’s ensure the points are clear, unmuddied, and undeniable in their gravity.

This is my theory from page 25 of this thread:

[quote=Daventry;6510741]So are you saying that the brother and sister-in-law came over the night before, fed the dog a whole lot of Taco Bell, came back the next morning and squeezed the crap out of him, then choked the chickens, then grabbed the camera and snapped a bunch of photos and then stole the camera?

Sorry, I’m just trying to get all of the facts straight.
[/quote]

[QUOTE=Daventry;6515324]
Oh yeah, that makes sense. Her “attorney” is telling her to PM everybody and asking them to remove their posts. Is he also telling her to talk smack about you as well? :lol: Maybe it’s not so much of an “attorney” as it is the little voices inside her head. Sad to see that the “attorney” also seems to have a selective moral compass. :no:[/QUOTE]

Welcome to the Dark Side, Daventry. I’m saving you a seat in detention:winkgrin:

Since the 2 threads was ruled out; I vote for a “Humor After Dark” thread rule. Like SkinaMax, except w/ humor not porn. If you don’t have Cinemax in Canada, that won’t make sense.

Totally agree and the silliness is diluting the relevance of the thread. I have no dog in this fight, but you are losing readers. I am just about ready to give up.

[QUOTE=Daventry;6514969]
I will rephrase what I said then…I don’t think a good attorney would give that advice. ;)[/QUOTE]

Like you would know the difference…

Oh falseimpression, don’t be a poop. We are just breaking up the monotiny (sp?)
Don’t be a poop…heh heh (done in my best Napolian Dynamite voice)

[QUOTE=runwayz;6515343]
Oh falseimpression, don’t be a poop. We are just breaking up the monotiny (sp?)
Don’t be a poop…heh heh (done in my best Napolian Dynamite voice)[/QUOTE]

Okay, I started a Jill Burnell Gray Fox Farms Facts thread. Somebody else is going to have to be in charge of that.

Now, for the not the facts emotional healing thread, it needs a good name. Suggestions?

[QUOTE=Mardi;6515200]
'Cuse me…(raising hand)… I’m still waiting for you to tell me which airport my attorney will need to fly to so he can be present at my deposition.[/QUOTE]

Laguardia. Sounds like you need a trip right?

Well I gotta go to bed, its a school night. Goodnight Idazians, goodnight Daventry, goodnight Rapapzini, goodnight equinerepro, goodnight John boy, goodnight Mary Ellen, goodnight Grandpa Walton, …

[QUOTE=JoZ;6515226]
I’m having fun with this one. Where would one come up with the props? I know I don’t have dead chickens, dog feces and breeding equipment in various stages of decay just lying about waiting for me to hatch a conspiracy.

ETA: jinx, Idaziens. I see we were thinking the exact same thing![/QUOTE]

Your kidding right?

Thanks, dags, I agree. This thread pains me to read, but I’ve read it all.

I have followed this thread since the beginning, and have noted the facts. I will try to be as civil as possible but the thought of GFF for me stirs a lot of anger and disappointment. It’s nice to see that you’re reading this thread, Jill. Maybe you’ll be kind enough to cough up the ultrasounds of my mare being “pregnant”. My mare was much thinner than when she was delivered to you with a host of issues that she never had before. I expected a lot better. After I picked my jaw up off of the ground as to how she looked when she stepped off the trailer from your farm, I had my vet right out. His words were “she’s as open as a present on Christmas day.” In the back of my mind, I knew that this was going to be the outcome. I am embarrassed that I sent my mare to you.

I’m just glad I got her back safely. You knew that the shipper was coming to your farm, because I called/emailed you/had the dispatcher try to contact you all week prior to the shipping date. We got no response from you. Ever. Why did it take two hours for you to release her to the shipper? A horse that was never yours? I trusted you with the care of my mare, CARE being the operative word. I have so many unanswered questions and cannot believe anything that you told me during the time that my mare was at your farm. I was a newbie to the breeding world, but I certainly learned my lesson. Consider my stud fee a parting gift. Do I consider myself monetarily defrauded? That’s a grey area. I’m not owed money, just the truth. For me, money is beside the point. Lied to and deliberately misled? Definitely. Would I do business with GFF ever again? Absolutely not. Angry? You have no idea.

Please, please give all of your information to equinedriver who posts on this thread. She has agreed to compile all of the evidence and hand it over to the FBI and local law enforcement. The more people that come forward, the more evidence that is presented, and the more a pattern of deceit can be proven…the better! :wink:

“Jill “technically” doesn’t have a sister-in-law :wink: Her brother and Yvonne are common law. So technically, I guess Jill wasn’t lying :rolleyes: and she “doesn’t have” a sister-in-law…like regardless, that makes EVERYTHING else just go away.”

Daventry, since we’re sticking to facts: http://www.yourlawcenter.com/2012/08/common-law-marriage-california/