[QUOTE=ToN Farm;6488974]
How differently we all see things. It shouldn’t be that way, should it? Is it the same in judging hunters? I know it never used to be when I rode hunters 30 years ago. Then, everyone knew a good round. Now, we have people mesmerized with a certain pair while some others find it cringe worthy. That bothers me a lot.
I think that some of it is because many viewers do not understand how judges score dressage. Too many people have their things that bug them, and those aren’t the things that matter so much in the judging. And then, there is the factor that we all tend to see what’s good in the pairs we like and the faults in the pairs we don’t.[/QUOTE]
I think what bothers most dressage people is the fact that the rules and diagrams show that the horse should not be btv and short in the neck and body and the judges are rewarding it.
It’s there in black and white, and yet they go against their own rules. It comes down to how they’re trained to score. And it seems that it’s off from the rule book a bit. It’s tilting a bit back to what is correct, but not fast enough. The halo effect still surrounds the permanently-living-btv crowd and it’s just hard to end their reign.
I’m happy to see that the Brits are not riding their horses btv all the time. Sometimes one goes there, yes. It happens. But they don’t live there. It gives us hope that the next generation wants more harmony, forwardness and correct (by the rule book) movements.