“evening dressage”?
I am curious about the rules (written or unwritten) about top hats, double bridles, shadbellies and the like in Dressage.
–Tophat and long coats are not the same as in hunt seat, where they are part of a formal uniform for specific classes. The tophat and long coat is associated with the upper levels of dressage, and is simply not allowed by the rules, at the lower levels. Most people will never show above first or second level, so most dressage riders will never need a long coat or a tophat.
–Regular top hats and shadbellies (long coat) are traditional for the upper levels (Prix St Georges and above). A person is allowed by the rules to wear a short coat at those levels, but I believe that still affects what kind of hat he can wear at those levels. It is very unusual to see anyone use a short coat for the upper levels.
–The double bridle and spurs are required for upper level classes. In some of the upper level classes, whips are allowed. The rules for lower levels changed recently and a rider can now choose between a double and snaffle bridle at third level. I believe a person riding the upper levels can opt to wear a helmet if he wants to.
–At the lower levels, the short coat is worn. There is a short coat that looks like a shadbelly a little in front, but the tails are very short. The style came out a few years ago and I think is officially regarded as a short coat. I don’t think it’s really caught on hugely.
–A few years ago the rules about hats were made much less restrictive. In the USA, crash helmets or black velvet hunt caps are what most people seem to prefer, I think you still see more professionals wearing a bowler at the lower levels. Some people wear the shorter top hat.
Not curious for me so much, as I will probably be in my helmet and Hunter clothes forever, but just for interest’s sake.
Also, spurs and a Dressage whip…if your horse doesn’t need them to keep forward, is it wise to just forget both at lower levels?
–It depends. Many people are reluctant to try to teach an unwilling, upset horse to learn to tolerate a whip or if the horse seems to be upset or frightened by it. I know a great many amateur riders who feel whip and spur are unnecessary, I don’t know a lot of professionals who bring youngsters along up thru all the levels, and have more experience, who would say the same.
–Most of the more experienced trainers will tell you that if you want to really move your horse up and get a really good performance out of him in dressage, he needs to learn to accept and respond to both the whip and the spur properly…not because the rider wants to beat his horse more effectively, but because these tools allow for more complete and communicative training process. Most experienced trainers will tell you these tools are just too indispensable to do without.
–Myself, I can’t imagine ever doing without whip for the youngster, not to beat him, but to teach him to respond to lighter aids, or spur (but the spur is only good after the basic forward has been completely established, I don’t feel spurs in dressage should EVER be used 'to make the horse go forward when he does not want to. I believe it’s for refining the aids, not as a punishment or to do very, very basic schooling as to what ‘leg’ means).