[QUOTE=Perfect Pony;6006218]
And btw I will agree with this. I have known 4 personally, and have ridden 2. One 3 year old I had on trial, one 3 year old and one 5 year old were at a barn I was training at, so I have had a lot of experience with these at least. All had good temperaments, although the 3 year old did not vet, and none of them I would necessarily call upper level dressage prospects.[/QUOTE]
I don’t think Frankie is going to be an upper level dressage horse. He’s way too mellow (though he did illustrate an ability to do one tempis when he was hacking at Devon Horse Show as a 3 year old, embarassingly). The other one that was at Dressage at Devon, Foley, I would say probably is an upper level prospect. http://amandajohnsondressage.com/horses/ But it’s also relative-- Frankie is ridden mainly by sad-sack-ammy-adult-hunter me, and Foley’s owner/rider is a very talented pro
I would suspect that a LOT of Fabuluex offspring are BEING BRED for amatuers, and so are naturally less likely (by design) to have the type of movement/spark that an upper level type needs. Of course, the dam also plays a large part.
I am surprised more people haven’t started using him for hunters. IMHO (and I am not a breeder, but it’s my anecdotal observation) that the best hunter combination to produce a hunter foal is a dam who has a great hunter jump, great and flat hunter trot, and quiet temperment bred to a dressage sire that has a great canter and quiet temperment. Fabuleux would suit nicely. It seems like quite a few of the popular “hunter stallions” themselves move great, but the offspring lack athleticism and jump. I can think of only a handful of hunter stallions whose offspring are in the same quality category as the stallion.
There is just NO REASON that Frankie should put up with my amateur behind the way he does. No reason. But he does. That’s priceless to me, and I’d give up some boing boing boing (even in the dressage ring) for a horse that’s so willing to be a partner.