Related question: “how long is a piece of string”, right? But I’m curious as to where you, personally, draw this line.
Obviously, you can keep three horses on less than an acre, if you don’t mind keeping them California-style, you dry-lot the entire property, and you still like mud. Obviously Cherry Hill’s Horsekeeping on a Small Acreage has some excellent suggestions for maximizing your available space, whatever that happens to be. Obviously this also varies dependent on your horsekeeping style.
But what I’m asking about, and what I’m interested in, is your thoughts as to the amount of land required to make it pretty straightforward. To not spend a substantial amount of time and energy fighting the constraints of your acreage. To have riding facilities, adequate turnout, and not be in the horse equivalent of a 200 sq ft studio apartment.
What’s your minimum amount of land to meet that bar for three horses, and what does that look like in terms of your turnout arrangements and other factors? (e.g. out 24x7, in/out 12/12, group vs. individual, etc.)
Context, for those interested: Have been farm-shopping for a few years now. Would personally be happiest with a hundred acres and not able to see the neighbors. Given the other constraints, that’s not going to happen. Had previously been holding 15 ac as an absolute hard stop minimum, with an extremely strong preference for at least 20-25 ac, but recent economic changes (both macro and micro) mean that that’s likely not going to be a possibility for a few years. On the other hand, a farmette of 5-9 ac that meets all the other requirements is still feasible, but I’d rather keep boarding than spend all my time managing the limitations of the land; my ideal management style is 24x7 turnout with stalls for emergencies/occasional convenience (e.g. shipping early to an event or ice storms.)