[QUOTE=Romantic Rider;3892786]
Wow, those Asgard fillies are ugly. I don’t mean to offend anyone, and I’ve heard so much about the Asgard horses. But, I’ve always thought Heraldic was ugly too. Obviously looks aren’t everything. Nevertheless, I don’t see why a horse can’t be pretty and functional at the same time. ;)[/QUOTE]
Well, it depends what you are buying for. If you are a serious endurance competitor who wants to go to the highest level, then looks won’t matter at all to you. General correctness and movement will. During an interview John Crandell said that is why his father picked out Heraldic – out of a herd of 20 some, his movement just was amazing. Effortless, but with plenty of power.
And he certainly proved his worth, although I wish they’d waited afew years before pushing him that hard, 'cause it doesn’t seem he’s competing anymore…
Still, he certainly showed he was a top endurance horse.
As for heads…yes, those Asgard fillies have rather plain heads, but that’s not really what bothered me (I have a TB background too, and I have Tekes, so I don’t mind a plainer head – heaven help me, I have WBs(!), so I REALLY don’t mind a plain head…) – more like the unharmonious conformation.
But again, they could be late bloomers. Or, like Bonnie pointed out, if they move really well, that could override everything, IMHO.